[BugFix] fix no matching function error in array_contains/array_position (backport #51835) #51879
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why I'm doing:
What I'm doing:
Fixes https://github.com/StarRocks/StarRocksTest/issues/8662
introduced by: #50912
taking
array_contains
as an example,before #50912,
array_contains
had only one function signaturearray_contains(ANY_ARRAY,ANY_ELEMENT)
. in #50912, I added many type-specialized function signatures for it and special handings innormalizeDecimalArgTypes
.FunctionAnalyzer will determine whether to follow the logic of
getDecimalV3Function
based on whether the arguments contain decimal type.array_contains
is a bit special. forarray_contains(array<array<decimal>>, array<decimal>)
, the second argument will hit the check logic ofargumentTypeContainDecimalV3
and go togetDecimalV3Function
. sincearray<decimal>
anddecimal
don't have a common type, the subsequent processing will cause errors.In fact, this situation should not follow the processing logic of
getDecimalV3Function
, so I made a special judgment in this pr to solve this problem.What type of PR is this:
Does this PR entail a change in behavior?
If yes, please specify the type of change:
Checklist:
Bugfix cherry-pick branch check:
This is an automatic backport of pull request #51835 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com). ## Why I'm doing:
What I'm doing:
Fixes https://github.com/StarRocks/StarRocksTest/issues/8662
introduced by: #50912
taking
array_contains
as an example,before #50912,
array_contains
had only one function signaturearray_contains(ANY_ARRAY,ANY_ELEMENT)
. in #50912, I added many type-specialized function signatures for it and special handings innormalizeDecimalArgTypes
.FunctionAnalyzer will determine whether to follow the logic of
getDecimalV3Function
based on whether the arguments contain decimal type.array_contains
is a bit special. forarray_contains(array<array<decimal>>, array<decimal>)
, the second argument will hit the check logic ofargumentTypeContainDecimalV3
and go togetDecimalV3Function
. sincearray<decimal>
anddecimal
don't have a common type, the subsequent processing will cause errors.In fact, this situation should not follow the processing logic of
getDecimalV3Function
, so I made a special judgment in this pr to solve this problem.What type of PR is this:
Does this PR entail a change in behavior?
If yes, please specify the type of change:
Checklist: