Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Enhancement] optimize scheduler one task cost #50328

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 25, 2024

Conversation

hoffermei
Copy link
Contributor

@hoffermei hoffermei commented Aug 27, 2024

Why I'm doing:

In our cluster with more than 200 routine load jobs, when I trace com.starrocks.load.routineload.RoutineLoadTaskScheduler:scheduleOneTask, some times get very slow in checkTaskInJob

`---ts=2024-07-30 22:59:08;thread_name=pool-17-thread-47;id=b0a;is_daemon=false;priority=5;TCCL=sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader@63947c6b
    `---[28802.292221ms] com.starrocks.load.routineload.RoutineLoadManager:checkTaskInJob()
        +---[0.00% 0.001172ms ] com.starrocks.load.routineload.RoutineLoadManager:readLock() #622
        +---[100.00% min=9.12E-4ms,max=626.112241ms,total=28802.075645ms,count=107] com.starrocks.load.routineload.RoutineLoadJob:containsTask() #625
        `---[0.00% 0.003156ms ] com.starrocks.load.routineload.RoutineLoadManager:readUnlock() #631

What I'm doing:

Replace RoutineLoadMgr::checkTaskInJob with only check whether task in current job, than check task in all current jobs.

Fixes #issue

What type of PR is this:

  • BugFix
  • Feature
  • Enhancement
  • Refactor
  • UT
  • Doc
  • Tool

Does this PR entail a change in behavior?

  • Yes, this PR will result in a change in behavior.
  • No, this PR will not result in a change in behavior.

If yes, please specify the type of change:

  • Interface/UI changes: syntax, type conversion, expression evaluation, display information
  • Parameter changes: default values, similar parameters but with different default values
  • Policy changes: use new policy to replace old one, functionality automatically enabled
  • Feature removed
  • Miscellaneous: upgrade & downgrade compatibility, etc.

Checklist:

  • I have added test cases for my bug fix or my new feature
  • This pr needs user documentation (for new or modified features or behaviors)
    • I have added documentation for my new feature or new function
  • This is a backport pr

Bugfix cherry-pick branch check:

  • I have checked the version labels which the pr will be auto-backported to the target branch
    • 3.3
    • 3.2
    • 3.1
    • 3.0
    • 2.5

@hoffermei hoffermei force-pushed the optimize_routine_load_schedule_cost branch from b6f672d to 0cfa06d Compare August 27, 2024 09:56
@hoffermei hoffermei closed this Aug 27, 2024
@hoffermei hoffermei reopened this Aug 27, 2024
@hoffermei hoffermei changed the title optimize scheduler one task cost [Enhancement] optimize scheduler one task cost Aug 27, 2024
@hoffermei hoffermei force-pushed the optimize_routine_load_schedule_cost branch from 0cfa06d to d2fe7c7 Compare September 5, 2024 10:06
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Sep 9, 2024

@hoffermei hoffermei force-pushed the optimize_routine_load_schedule_cost branch from d2fe7c7 to 577de79 Compare November 20, 2024 08:18
@hoffermei hoffermei force-pushed the optimize_routine_load_schedule_cost branch from 577de79 to c43fc75 Compare November 20, 2024 08:38
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Nov 20, 2024

Copy link

[Java-Extensions Incremental Coverage Report]

pass : 0 / 0 (0%)

Copy link

[FE Incremental Coverage Report]

pass : 4 / 4 (100.00%)

file detail

path covered_line new_line coverage not_covered_line_detail
🔵 com/starrocks/load/routineload/RoutineLoadTaskScheduler.java 1 1 100.00% []
🔵 com/starrocks/load/routineload/RoutineLoadMgr.java 3 3 100.00% []

Copy link

[BE Incremental Coverage Report]

pass : 0 / 0 (0%)

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the 3.0 label Nov 25, 2024
@wyb wyb enabled auto-merge (squash) November 25, 2024 08:26
@wyb wyb merged commit 5320302 into StarRocks:main Nov 25, 2024
62 checks passed
Copy link

@Mergifyio backport branch-3.3

Copy link

@Mergifyio backport branch-3.2

Copy link

@Mergifyio backport branch-3.1

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the 3.1 label Nov 25, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Nov 25, 2024

backport branch-3.3

✅ Backports have been created

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Nov 25, 2024

backport branch-3.2

✅ Backports have been created

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Nov 25, 2024

backport branch-3.1

✅ Backports have been created

mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2024
Signed-off-by: hoffermei <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 5320302)
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2024
Signed-off-by: hoffermei <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 5320302)
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2024
Signed-off-by: hoffermei <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 5320302)
wanpengfei-git pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2024
wanpengfei-git pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2024
wanpengfei-git pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants