Add hierarchy to handle multiple matching rules for a failure

src/report/report.py

@@ -350,6 +350,9 @@ def failure_matches_rule(
             if default_rule not in matching_rules:
                 matching_rules.append(default_rule)
 
+        # Sort matching_rules by the identical rules to failure.step
+        if matching_rules:
+            matching_rules = sorted(matching_rules, key=lambda x: x.step.__eq__(failure.step), reverse=True)
         return matching_rules
 
     def add_passing_job_comment(self, job: Job, jira: Jira, issue_id: str) -> None:

tests/unittests/functions/report/test_firewatch_functions_report_failure_matches_rule.py

@@ -68,3 +68,32 @@ def test_failure_matches_rule_with_matches(self):
         assert (matching_rules[0].step == match_rule.step) and (
             matching_rules[0].failure_type == match_rule.failure_type
         )
+
+    def test_configuration_gets_failure_rules_with_two_matching_steps(self):
+        failure = Failure(failed_step="exact-failed-step", failure_type="test_failure")
+
+        match_rule = FailureRule(
+            rule_dict={
+                "step": "exact-failed-step",
+                "failure_type": "test_failure",
+                "classification": "NONE",
+                "jira_project": "NONE",
+            },
+        )
+        pattern_rule = FailureRule(
+            rule_dict={
+                "step": "exact-*",
+                "failure_type": "test_failure",
+                "classification": "NONE",
+                "jira_project": "NONE",
+            },
+        )
+        rules = [pattern_rule, match_rule]
+
+        matching_rules = self.report.failure_matches_rule(
+            failure=failure,
+            rules=rules,
+            default_jira_project=self.config.default_jira_project,
+        )
+        # Check if match_rule is sorted higher than pattern_rule
+        assert matching_rules[0].step.__eq__(failure.step)