fixed enable_avoid_dynamic_calls

[Azad99-9]

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

This PR fixes the issue enable_avoid_dynamic_calls

Issue Number:

Fixes #1721

Did you add tests for your changes?

Snapshots/Videos:

If relevant, did you update the documentation?

Summary

removed theignore directive : avoid_dynamic_call from the codebase and fixed the consequential warnings.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

No

Other information

Have you read the contributing guide?

Yes

[github-actions]

Our Pull Request Approval Process

We have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team.

Testing Your Code

Please make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if either of these two conditions occur:

1. The overall code coverage drops below the target threshold of the repository
2. Any file in the pull request has code coverage levels below the repository threshold

The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing.

Reviewers

When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

1. comments in this PR or
2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

Other

🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.

[palisadoes]

Shouldn't you also include the updated analysis_options.yaml file?

[Azad99-9]

@palisadoes
actually the analysis_options.yaml file is already updated in this PR.
So now the task of the issue has boiled down to remove the ignore_directives from the entire codebase and fix the respective warnings.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (705627f) 93.64% compared to head (944a0c4) 94.93%.
Report is 7 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #2312      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    93.64%   94.93%   +1.29%     
===========================================
  Files          157      157              
  Lines         7533     7538       +5     
===========================================
+ Hits          7054     7156     +102     
+ Misses         479      382      -97     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[palisadoes]

Thanks. Please work with the assigned reviewers to approve your approach

[literalEval]

Thanks for writing docs properly. Please do these minor changes.

[Azad99-9]

@literalEval @Ayush0Chaudhary @DMills27 @noman2002 kindly review this PR.

[literalEval]

Please fix the doc as suggested now

[Azad99-9]

@literalEval please have a look i have reformatted the docs.

[literalEval]

Please make sure that every doc (and possibly code too), is in the range of 80 characters per line max.

[literalEval]

@Azad99-9 please do this quick change.

[Azad99-9]

Sure @literalEval

[Azad99-9]

@literalEval please have a look, I have updated the comments length.

[literalEval]

LGTM