feat: Add support for bulk tag operations (GSoC) #2616
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces enhancements to the GraphQL schema by adding a new input type Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessWe have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team. Testing Your CodePlease make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if these conditions occur:
The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 10
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
src/typeDefs/inputs.ts (1)
440-443: LGTM with minor suggestions for improved clarity.The
TagActionsInputtype is well-structured and follows GraphQL schema best practices. However, the field names could be more descriptive to better convey their purpose in bulk operations.Consider renaming the fields for better clarity:
input TagActionsInput { - currentTagId: ID! - selectedTagIds: [ID!]! + sourceTagId: ID! + targetTagIds: [ID!]! }This makes it clearer that:
sourceTagIdis the tag from which users will be copied/movedtargetTagIdsare the tags to which users will be assigned/removedtests/resolvers/Mutation/removeFromUserTags.spec.ts (2)
66-70: Consider adding database cleanup in afterEachThe current afterEach only resets mocks but doesn't clean up the test data. This could lead to test pollution where data from one test affects another.
Consider adding database cleanup:
afterEach(() => { + // Clean up test data + await Promise.all([ + User.deleteMany({}), + TagUser.deleteMany({}), + OrganizationTagUser.deleteMany({}), + AppUserProfile.deleteMany({}) + ]); vi.doUnmock("../../../src/constants"); vi.resetModules(); vi.resetAllMocks(); });
201-304: Add test case for removing multiple tags simultaneouslyThe current test suite doesn't verify the bulk removal of multiple tags at once, which is a key feature of this mutation.
Consider adding a test case that:
- Assigns multiple tags to users
- Removes multiple tags in a single operation
- Verifies that all specified tags are removed while unspecified tags remain
Example structure:
it('should successfully remove multiple tags simultaneously', async () => { // Setup: Create users and assign multiple tags // Execute: Remove multiple tags in one operation const args: MutationRemoveFromUserTagsArgs = { input: { selectedTagIds: [testTag2?._id.toString() ?? "", testTag3?._id.toString() ?? ""], currentTagId: testTag?._id.toString() ?? "", }, }; // Verify: All specified tags are removed, others remain });src/resolvers/Mutation/assignToUserTags.ts (3)
115-123: Handle cases when no users have the current tagIf no users are found with the
currentTagId,userIdsWithCurrentTagwill be an empty array. This could lead to the bulk write operation being skipped silently.Consider adding a check to handle this scenario explicitly or log a message indicating that no users were found with the current tag. This can help with debugging and ensure clarity in the application's flow.
100-113: Simplify permissions check for organization admin statusThe current check combines both the organization admin and super admin status in a single condition (lines 100-113). This can be simplified for better readability.
Refactor the condition to first check for super admin status, which can prevent unnecessary iteration over
adminForif the user is already a super admin.Apply this change:
- if (!(currentUserIsOrganizationAdmin || currentUserAppProfile.isSuperAdmin)) { + if (!(currentUserAppProfile.isSuperAdmin || currentUserIsOrganizationAdmin)) {Or combine the check:
const isAuthorized = currentUserAppProfile.isSuperAdmin || currentUserAppProfile.adminFor.some((orgId) => orgId && new Types.ObjectId(orgId.toString()).equals(currentTag.organizationId), ); if (!isAuthorized) { throw new errors.UnauthorizedError( requestContext.translate(USER_NOT_AUTHORIZED_ERROR.MESSAGE), USER_NOT_AUTHORIZED_ERROR.CODE, USER_NOT_AUTHORIZED_ERROR.PARAM, ); }
171-171: Consider returning a meaningful responseThe resolver currently returns
currentTag(line 171). Depending on the GraphQL schema, this may not provide sufficient feedback to the client about the operation's success.Consider returning an object that includes details such as the number of users updated or a success message. This can improve the client's ability to provide feedback to the end-user.
Example:
return { success: true, message: 'Tags assigned successfully', tag: currentTag, };tests/resolvers/Mutation/assignToUserTags.spec.ts (1)
73-74: Refactor repetitive mock implementations into abeforeEachhookThe mocking of
requestContext.translateis repeated in multiple tests. Consider moving this setup into abeforeEachhook to reduce duplication and improve maintainability.Apply this refactor:
+ beforeEach(() => { + vi.spyOn(requestContext, "translate").mockImplementation((message) => `Translated ${message}`); + }); - const spy = vi - .spyOn(requestContext, "translate") - .mockImplementationOnce((message) => `Translated ${message}`);Adjust the
afterEachhook accordingly to reset mocks:afterEach(() => { vi.doUnmock("../../../src/constants"); vi.resetModules(); - vi.resetAllMocks(); + vi.restoreAllMocks(); });Also applies to: 103-104, 135-136, 169-170, 351-352
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
- schema.graphql (3 hunks)
- src/resolvers/Mutation/assignToUserTags.ts (1 hunks)
- src/resolvers/Mutation/index.ts (4 hunks)
- src/resolvers/Mutation/removeFromUserTags.ts (1 hunks)
- src/typeDefs/inputs.ts (1 hunks)
- src/typeDefs/mutations.ts (2 hunks)
- src/types/generatedGraphQLTypes.ts (9 hunks)
- tests/resolvers/Mutation/assignToUserTags.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/resolvers/Mutation/removeFromUserTags.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (2)
tests/resolvers/Mutation/assignToUserTags.spec.ts (4)
Learnt from: meetulr PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#2460 File: tests/resolvers/Mutation/assignUserTag.spec.ts:35-44 Timestamp: 2024-08-15T13:37:37.956Z Learning: The variable `testSubTag1` is used in the `assignUserTag` test suite to verify that ancestor tags are correctly assigned.Learnt from: meetulr PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#2460 File: tests/resolvers/Mutation/assignUserTag.spec.ts:35-44 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T16:13:41.996Z Learning: The variable `testSubTag1` is used in the `assignUserTag` test suite to verify that ancestor tags are correctly assigned.Learnt from: meetulr PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#2460 File: tests/resolvers/Mutation/unassignUserTag.spec.ts:32-37 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T16:13:41.996Z Learning: The variable `testSubTag1` is used in the `unassignUserTag` tests to verify the unassignment of child tags.Learnt from: meetulr PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#2460 File: tests/resolvers/Mutation/unassignUserTag.spec.ts:32-37 Timestamp: 2024-08-15T13:37:28.099Z Learning: The variable `testSubTag1` is used in the `unassignUserTag` tests to verify the unassignment of child tags.tests/resolvers/Mutation/removeFromUserTags.spec.ts (4)
Learnt from: meetulr PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#2460 File: tests/resolvers/Mutation/assignUserTag.spec.ts:35-44 Timestamp: 2024-08-15T13:37:37.956Z Learning: The variable `testSubTag1` is used in the `assignUserTag` test suite to verify that ancestor tags are correctly assigned.Learnt from: meetulr PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#2460 File: tests/resolvers/Mutation/assignUserTag.spec.ts:35-44 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T16:13:41.996Z Learning: The variable `testSubTag1` is used in the `assignUserTag` test suite to verify that ancestor tags are correctly assigned.Learnt from: meetulr PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#2460 File: tests/resolvers/Mutation/unassignUserTag.spec.ts:32-37 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T16:13:41.996Z Learning: The variable `testSubTag1` is used in the `unassignUserTag` tests to verify the unassignment of child tags.Learnt from: meetulr PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#2460 File: tests/resolvers/Mutation/unassignUserTag.spec.ts:32-37 Timestamp: 2024-08-15T13:37:28.099Z Learning: The variable `testSubTag1` is used in the `unassignUserTag` tests to verify the unassignment of child tags.
🪛 GitHub Check: Check for linting, formatting, and type errors
src/resolvers/Mutation/removeFromUserTags.ts
[failure] 133-133:
'allTagsToRemove' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead
🔇 Additional comments (12)
src/resolvers/Mutation/index.ts (2)
13-13: LGTM! Import statements follow the established pattern.The new imports for bulk tag operations are properly organized and follow the consistent import pattern used throughout the file.
Also applies to: 82-82
132-133: LGTM! Mutation entries are properly organized.The new mutations for bulk tag operations are correctly placed in alphabetical order within the
Mutationobject, maintaining consistency with the existing structure.Let's verify the implementation:
Also applies to: 203-203
✅ Verification successful
Bulk tag operations are properly integrated in both resolvers and schema
The verification confirms:
- Resolver files exist at correct locations:
assignToUserTags.tsandremoveFromUserTags.ts- GraphQL schema properly defines:
- Input type
TagActionsInput- Mutations
assignToUserTagsandremoveFromUserTags- All components are in place and correctly referenced
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of resolver files and GraphQL schema definitions # Test 1: Check if resolver files exist echo "Checking resolver files..." for file in "assignToUserTags" "removeFromUserTags"; do fd "^${file}.ts$" src/resolvers/Mutation done # Test 2: Verify GraphQL schema definitions echo "Checking GraphQL schema..." rg "assignToUserTags|removeFromUserTags|TagActionsInput" src/typeDefs/Length of output: 713
src/typeDefs/mutations.ts (3)
42-44: LGTM! The assignToUserTags mutation is well-defined.The mutation is correctly positioned alphabetically and includes appropriate authentication and role requirements for bulk operations.
235-237: LGTM! The removeFromUserTags mutation is well-defined.The mutation maintains consistency with its counterpart assignToUserTags in terms of authentication, role requirements, and return type.
42-44: Verify the TagActionsInput type definition.The implementation looks good, but let's verify the structure of TagActionsInput to ensure it properly supports bulk operations.
Also applies to: 235-237
✅ Verification successful
TagActionsInput type definition is properly structured for bulk operations
The type definition has been verified and contains the necessary fields for bulk operations:
currentTagId: ID!- for identifying the target tagselectedTagIds: [ID!]!- for handling multiple tag selectionsThe type is consistently defined across the schema and generated types, making it suitable for the
assignToUserTagsmutation.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for TagActionsInput type definition ast-grep --pattern 'input TagActionsInput { $$$ }' # Also check for any existing tests rg -l "TagActionsInput" --type testLength of output: 119
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for TagActionsInput type definition in all files rg "type TagActionsInput|input TagActionsInput" -A 5 # Search for files containing TagActionsInput fd . -t f -x rg -l "TagActionsInput" {} # Search for test files with .test, .spec, or __tests__ in path fd . -t f -x rg -l "TagActionsInput" {} -g '**/*.{test,spec}.*' -g '**/__tests__/**'Length of output: 1203
src/typeDefs/inputs.ts (1)
440-443: Verify integration with mutations.Let's ensure the input type is properly integrated with the mentioned mutations.
✅ Verification successful
Input type is properly integrated with mutations
The
TagActionsInputis correctly integrated and used in both mutations:
assignToUserTagsmutation for assigning multiple tags to usersremoveFromUserTagsmutation for removing multiple tags from usersBoth mutations:
- Are properly defined in
mutations.tswith the correct input type- Have complete resolver implementations with proper input validation
- Include proper authorization checks (@auth and @ROLE directives)
- Handle the input fields (
currentTagIdandselectedTagIds) as expected🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the mutations using TagActionsInput are properly defined # Expected: Find mutation definitions for assignToUserTags and removeFromUserTags echo "Checking mutation definitions..." rg -l "assignToUserTags.*TagActionsInput|removeFromUserTags.*TagActionsInput" --type ts echo "Checking resolver implementations..." rg -l "assignToUserTags|removeFromUserTags" --type ts --glob "src/resolvers/**"Length of output: 475
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's verify the actual implementation and usage of TagActionsInput echo "Checking mutation type definitions..." rg "assignToUserTags|removeFromUserTags" src/typeDefs/mutations.ts -A 2 -B 2 echo -e "\nChecking resolver implementations..." cat src/resolvers/Mutation/assignToUserTags.ts src/resolvers/Mutation/removeFromUserTags.tsLength of output: 11597
schema.graphql (2)
1614-1617: LGTM! Well-structured input type for bulk operations.The
TagActionsInputtype is well-designed with:
- Clear field names that indicate their purpose
- Proper use of non-null constraints
- Reusable structure for both assign and remove operations
1071-1071: LGTM! Mutations are properly defined for bulk tag operations.The mutations
assignToUserTagsandremoveFromUserTags:
- Use consistent naming that clearly indicates their purpose
- Share the same input type, promoting code reuse
- Return
UserTagtype for proper response handlingLet's verify the mutations have corresponding resolvers:
Also applies to: 1133-1133
✅ Verification successful
Mutations are properly implemented with corresponding resolvers ✅
The verification confirms:
- Both resolver files exist at expected locations:
src/resolvers/Mutation/assignToUserTags.tssrc/resolvers/Mutation/removeFromUserTags.ts- Both mutations are correctly imported and exported in the resolver index file
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify resolver implementations exist for the new mutations # Test: Search for resolver files. Expect: Both resolver files exist fd "assignToUserTags.ts|removeFromUserTags.ts" "src/resolvers/Mutation" # Test: Search for resolver registrations. Expect: Both mutations registered rg "assignToUserTags|removeFromUserTags" "src/resolvers/Mutation/index.ts"Length of output: 390
src/types/generatedGraphQLTypes.ts (3)
2680-2683: LGTM! Well-structured input type for bulk tag operations.The
TagActionsInputtype is well-designed with:
currentTagIdfor specifying the target tagselectedTagIdsarray for bulk operations
1157-1157: LGTM! Mutations properly defined for bulk tag operations.The mutations
assignToUserTagsandremoveFromUserTagsare correctly typed:
- Return type is nullable UserTag
- Use TagActionsInput for arguments
- Match the PR objectives for bulk tag management
Also applies to: 1219-1219
1332-1334: LGTM! Mutation argument types properly defined.The mutation argument types are correctly structured:
- Both use TagActionsInput
- Arguments are marked as required
- Consistent with GraphQL schema best practices
Also applies to: 1650-1652
src/resolvers/Mutation/assignToUserTags.ts (1)
42-77: Verify user retrieval logicEnsure that the user retrieval logic accounts for possible race conditions or cache inconsistencies. Since the caching and database fetch are separate asynchronous operations, there's a slight chance of data mismatch.
Run the following script to check if there are any inconsistencies in user data retrieval:
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the codebase to understand the caching implementation better.
Let me check the implementation of the caching functions to understand how they handle potential race conditions.
Based on the cache implementation analysis, I can now provide the final response:
Cache implementation is safe against race conditions
The caching implementation has built-in safeguards against race conditions and data inconsistencies:
- Short cache expiration (5 minutes) ensures stale data is automatically cleared
- Atomic pipeline operations for caching multiple users
- Proper error handling and type conversion during cache retrieval
- Null-safety checks throughout the implementation
- The fetch-then-cache pattern used in the code ensures fresh data is always cached when not found
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that user data retrieved from cache and database are consistent. # Test: Fetch the user from both cache and database, compare the results. # Expected: User data should be identical. # Fetch user from cache cached_user=$(redis-cli GET "user:${context.userId}") # Fetch user from database db_user=$(mongo mydb --quiet --eval "db.users.findOne({_id: ObjectId('${context.userId}')})") # Compare the results if [ "$cached_user" != "$db_user" ]; then echo "Inconsistency found between cached user and database user." else echo "User data is consistent." fiLength of output: 316
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the implementation of caching functions ast-grep --pattern 'async function findUserInCache' -A 20 ast-grep --pattern 'async function cacheUsers' -A 20 # Check if there are any other places where these caching functions are used rg "findUserInCache|cacheUsers" -A 2 # Look for any race condition handling or cache invalidation logic rg "invalidateCache|clearCache" -A 2Length of output: 77972
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Look for the cache implementation files fd "cacheUser|findUserInCache|deleteUserFromCache" -t f # Check the implementation of these files cat src/services/UserCache/cacheUser.ts cat src/services/UserCache/findUserInCache.ts cat src/services/UserCache/deleteUserFromCache.tsLength of output: 4090
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #2616 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 98.42% 98.44% +0.01%
===========================================
Files 340 342 +2
Lines 16518 16734 +216
Branches 2364 2408 +44
===========================================
+ Hits 16258 16473 +215
- Misses 257 258 +1
Partials 3 3 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
src/resolvers/Mutation/assignToUserTags.ts (2)
25-36: Enhance function documentation with error scenarios.While the documentation is good, consider adding:
- Return type details
- List of possible error scenarios (NotFoundError, UnauthorizedError)
- Example usage in GraphQL
/** * This function enables an admin to assign multiple tags to users with a specified tag. * @param _parent - parent of current request * @param args - payload provided with the request * @param context - context of entire application + * @throws {NotFoundError} When user or tag is not found + * @throws {UnauthorizedError} When user lacks required permissions + * @returns {Promise<InterfaceOrganizationTagUser>} The current tag object * @remarks The following checks are done: * 1. If the current user exists and has a profile. * 2. If the current user is an admin for the organization of the tags. * 3. If the currentTagId exists and the selected tags exist. * 4. Assign the tags to users who have the currentTagId. + * @example + * mutation { + * assignToUserTags(input: { + * currentTagId: "...", + * selectedTagIds: ["...", "..."] + * }) { + * _id + * name + * } + * } */
168-170: Consider adding batch size limits for bulk operations.Large bulk operations can impact database performance. Consider implementing batch processing for large datasets.
if (tagUserDocs.length > 0) { - await TagUser.bulkWrite(tagUserDocs); + const BATCH_SIZE = 1000; + for (let i = 0; i < tagUserDocs.length; i += BATCH_SIZE) { + const batch = tagUserDocs.slice(i, i + BATCH_SIZE); + await TagUser.bulkWrite(batch); + } }src/resolvers/Mutation/removeFromUserTags.ts (2)
21-32: Enhance return type documentationThe JSDoc comment could be more specific about the return type. Consider updating the @returns section to specify that it returns the current tag object (InterfaceOrganizationTagUser).
- * @returns Array of tags that were removed from users. + * @returns The current tag object (InterfaceOrganizationTagUser).
79-108: Consider using transactions for data consistencyWhile the validation logic is solid, consider wrapping the entire operation in a transaction to ensure data consistency, especially when dealing with multiple database operations.
Example implementation:
const session = await mongoose.startSession(); try { await session.withTransaction(async () => { // Existing validation logic // ... }); } finally { await session.endSession(); }tests/resolvers/Mutation/assignToUserTags.spec.ts (3)
207-209: Remove unnecessary rename in import statement.The import statement contains a useless rename.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
- const { assignToUserTags: assignToUserTagsResolver } = await import( + const { assignToUserTags } = await import( "../../../src/resolvers/Mutation/assignToUserTags" );
163-227: Consider improving test data setup and description.
- The test description could be more specific about what's being tested (e.g., "Should successfully assign new tag to multiple users who share an existing tag").
- Consider moving the test data setup to a beforeEach hook to reduce code duplication across test cases.
62-312: Consider adding performance and edge case tests.The test suite could benefit from additional test cases:
- Performance tests for bulk operations with a large number of users/tags
- Edge cases testing the system's behavior with maximum allowed tags/users
- Concurrent tag assignment scenarios
These tests would help ensure the bulk operations remain performant and reliable at scale.
tests/resolvers/Mutation/removeFromUserTags.spec.ts (1)
407-431: Consider adding JSDoc documentation to the helper function.The helper function is well-implemented, but adding documentation would improve maintainability:
+/** + * Helper function to test error scenarios in the removeFromUserTags mutation + * @param args - The mutation arguments + * @param context - The context containing userId + * @param expectedError - The expected error message + * @throws Error if the expected error is not thrown + */ const testErrorScenario = async ({ args, context, expectedError, }: { args: MutationRemoveFromUserTagsArgs; context: { userId: string }; expectedError: string; }): Promise<void> => {
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- src/resolvers/Mutation/assignToUserTags.ts (1 hunks)
- src/resolvers/Mutation/removeFromUserTags.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/resolvers/Mutation/assignToUserTags.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/resolvers/Mutation/removeFromUserTags.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (3)
src/resolvers/Mutation/removeFromUserTags.ts (1)
Learnt from: meetulr PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#2616 File: src/resolvers/Mutation/removeFromUserTags.ts:136-152 Timestamp: 2024-10-28T04:07:46.388Z Learning: Cycles cannot occur in the tag hierarchy in this project. Therefore, when traversing tags in functions like `removeFromUserTags` in `src/resolvers/Mutation/removeFromUserTags.ts`, infinite loops due to cyclic tag relationships are not a concern.tests/resolvers/Mutation/assignToUserTags.spec.ts (4)
Learnt from: meetulr PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#2460 File: tests/resolvers/Mutation/assignUserTag.spec.ts:35-44 Timestamp: 2024-08-15T13:37:37.956Z Learning: The variable `testSubTag1` is used in the `assignUserTag` test suite to verify that ancestor tags are correctly assigned.Learnt from: meetulr PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#2460 File: tests/resolvers/Mutation/assignUserTag.spec.ts:35-44 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T16:13:41.996Z Learning: The variable `testSubTag1` is used in the `assignUserTag` test suite to verify that ancestor tags are correctly assigned.Learnt from: meetulr PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#2460 File: tests/resolvers/Mutation/unassignUserTag.spec.ts:32-37 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T16:13:41.996Z Learning: The variable `testSubTag1` is used in the `unassignUserTag` tests to verify the unassignment of child tags.Learnt from: meetulr PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#2460 File: tests/resolvers/Mutation/unassignUserTag.spec.ts:32-37 Timestamp: 2024-08-15T13:37:28.099Z Learning: The variable `testSubTag1` is used in the `unassignUserTag` tests to verify the unassignment of child tags.tests/resolvers/Mutation/removeFromUserTags.spec.ts (2)
Learnt from: meetulr PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#2460 File: tests/resolvers/Mutation/assignUserTag.spec.ts:35-44 Timestamp: 2024-08-15T13:37:37.956Z Learning: The variable `testSubTag1` is used in the `assignUserTag` test suite to verify that ancestor tags are correctly assigned.Learnt from: meetulr PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#2460 File: tests/resolvers/Mutation/assignUserTag.spec.ts:35-44 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T16:13:41.996Z Learning: The variable `testSubTag1` is used in the `assignUserTag` test suite to verify that ancestor tags are correctly assigned.
🪛 Biome
tests/resolvers/Mutation/assignToUserTags.spec.ts
[error] 329-329: Useless rename.
Safe fix: Remove the renaming.
(lint/complexity/noUselessRename)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
src/resolvers/Mutation/assignToUserTags.ts (1)
1-24: LGTM! Imports and type definitions are well-organized.The imports are properly structured and include all necessary dependencies for the mutation resolver.
src/resolvers/Mutation/removeFromUserTags.ts (1)
33-78: LGTM! Robust user validation with cachingThe user validation logic is well-implemented with proper error handling and efficient caching strategy.
tests/resolvers/Mutation/assignToUserTags.spec.ts (3)
1-61: LGTM! Well-structured test setup.The test setup is comprehensive with proper database connection management and test data creation using helper functions.
62-68: LGTM! Proper test cleanup implementation.The afterEach hook correctly handles cleanup by unmocking and resetting all mocks.
314-338: LGTM! Well-implemented error testing helper.The helper function effectively reduces code duplication while maintaining proper type safety and error validation.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 329-329: Useless rename.
Safe fix: Remove the renaming.
(lint/complexity/noUselessRename)
tests/resolvers/Mutation/removeFromUserTags.spec.ts (3)
1-70: LGTM! Well-structured test setup.The test setup is comprehensive with proper database connection management, test data creation, and cleanup procedures.
166-269: LGTM! Comprehensive test coverage for successful tag removal.The test thoroughly verifies the bulk tag removal functionality with proper setup, execution, and verification steps. The user IDs in tag existence checks are correctly implemented.
271-404: LGTM! Well-implemented test for descendant tag removal.The test effectively verifies the hierarchical tag removal functionality, ensuring both ancestor and descendant tags are properly handled. The implementation aligns with the established patterns for tag relationship verification.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
tests/resolvers/Mutation/assignToUserTags.spec.ts (3)
142-206: Enhance tag assignment test coverageThe successful tag assignment test could be improved by:
- Verifying that the original tag (testTag2) is still assigned after adding the new tag
- Adding assertions for the total number of tags assigned to each user
Add these assertions after line 205:
// Verify original tag is still assigned const originalTagStillAssignedToUser1 = await TagUser.exists({ tagId: testTag2, userId: randomUser1?._id, }); const originalTagStillAssignedToUser2 = await TagUser.exists({ tagId: testTag2, userId: randomUser2?._id, }); expect(originalTagStillAssignedToUser1).toBeTruthy(); expect(originalTagStillAssignedToUser2).toBeTruthy(); // Verify total tag count const user1Tags = await TagUser.count({ userId: randomUser1?._id }); const user2Tags = await TagUser.count({ userId: randomUser2?._id }); expect(user1Tags).toBe(2); expect(user2Tags).toBe(2);
308-310: Remove unnecessary rename in import statementThe import statement contains a useless rename that can be simplified.
- const { assignToUserTags: assignToUserTags } = await import( + const { assignToUserTags } = await import( "../../../src/resolvers/Mutation/assignToUserTags" );🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 308-308: Useless rename.
Safe fix: Remove the renaming.
(lint/complexity/noUselessRename)
62-62: Consider adding these test casesTo improve test coverage, consider adding these scenarios:
- Attempting to assign the same tag multiple times in
selectedTagIds- Attempting to assign tags from a different organization
- Testing with an empty
selectedTagIdsarray- Testing with a large number of tags and users for performance
Would you like me to help generate these additional test cases?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- src/resolvers/Mutation/assignToUserTags.ts (1 hunks)
- src/resolvers/Mutation/removeFromUserTags.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/resolvers/Mutation/assignToUserTags.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/resolvers/Mutation/removeFromUserTags.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- src/resolvers/Mutation/assignToUserTags.ts
- src/resolvers/Mutation/removeFromUserTags.ts
- tests/resolvers/Mutation/removeFromUserTags.spec.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
tests/resolvers/Mutation/assignToUserTags.spec.ts (4)
Learnt from: meetulr PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#2460 File: tests/resolvers/Mutation/assignUserTag.spec.ts:35-44 Timestamp: 2024-08-15T13:37:37.956Z Learning: The variable `testSubTag1` is used in the `assignUserTag` test suite to verify that ancestor tags are correctly assigned.Learnt from: meetulr PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#2460 File: tests/resolvers/Mutation/assignUserTag.spec.ts:35-44 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T16:13:41.996Z Learning: The variable `testSubTag1` is used in the `assignUserTag` test suite to verify that ancestor tags are correctly assigned.Learnt from: meetulr PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#2460 File: tests/resolvers/Mutation/unassignUserTag.spec.ts:32-37 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T16:13:41.996Z Learning: The variable `testSubTag1` is used in the `unassignUserTag` tests to verify the unassignment of child tags.Learnt from: meetulr PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#2460 File: tests/resolvers/Mutation/unassignUserTag.spec.ts:32-37 Timestamp: 2024-08-15T13:37:28.099Z Learning: The variable `testSubTag1` is used in the `unassignUserTag` tests to verify the unassignment of child tags.
🪛 Biome
tests/resolvers/Mutation/assignToUserTags.spec.ts
[error] 308-308: Useless rename.
Safe fix: Remove the renaming.
(lint/complexity/noUselessRename)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- tests/resolvers/Mutation/assignToUserTags.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/resolvers/Mutation/removeFromUserTags.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- tests/resolvers/Mutation/removeFromUserTags.spec.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
tests/resolvers/Mutation/assignToUserTags.spec.ts (4)
Learnt from: meetulr PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#2460 File: tests/resolvers/Mutation/assignUserTag.spec.ts:35-44 Timestamp: 2024-08-15T13:37:37.956Z Learning: The variable `testSubTag1` is used in the `assignUserTag` test suite to verify that ancestor tags are correctly assigned.Learnt from: meetulr PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#2460 File: tests/resolvers/Mutation/assignUserTag.spec.ts:35-44 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T16:13:41.996Z Learning: The variable `testSubTag1` is used in the `assignUserTag` test suite to verify that ancestor tags are correctly assigned.Learnt from: meetulr PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#2460 File: tests/resolvers/Mutation/unassignUserTag.spec.ts:32-37 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T16:13:41.996Z Learning: The variable `testSubTag1` is used in the `unassignUserTag` tests to verify the unassignment of child tags.Learnt from: meetulr PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#2460 File: tests/resolvers/Mutation/unassignUserTag.spec.ts:32-37 Timestamp: 2024-08-15T13:37:28.099Z Learning: The variable `testSubTag1` is used in the `unassignUserTag` tests to verify the unassignment of child tags.
🪛 Biome
tests/resolvers/Mutation/assignToUserTags.spec.ts
[error] 305-305: Useless rename.
Safe fix: Remove the renaming.
(lint/complexity/noUselessRename)
palisadoes
merged commit 2c372d9
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Adds support for assigning/removing multiple tags to multiple people.
Issue Number:
Fixes #2614
Did you add tests for your changes?
Yes
Additional Context
talawa-admin issue: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2357
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
TagActionsInputfor managing user tags.assignToUserTagsandremoveFromUserTagsfor assigning and removing tags from users.Bug Fixes
Tests
assignToUserTagsandremoveFromUserTagsmutations to ensure proper functionality and error handling.