Events attended support added with fetching recurring event query #2551
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request enhance the GraphQL schema by introducing new query methods and fields related to event attendance and volunteer management. Specifically, two new queries, Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessWe have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team. Testing Your CodePlease make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if these conditions occur:
The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (15)
src/resolvers/Query/getRecurringEvents.ts (1)
4-9: Enhance JSDoc comments for completeness.The JSDoc comments are generally well-written and informative. However, there's room for improvement:
Consider updating the
@param _parentdescription to provide more context:- * @param _parent - + * @param _parent - Unused. Parent resolver's return value.This change will help developers understand why this parameter exists and why it's not used in this resolver.
src/resolvers/Query/eventsAttendedByUser.ts (2)
5-11: JSDoc comments are informative, but there's a minor typo.The JSDoc comments provide clear and useful information about the function's purpose, parameters, and return value. However, there's a small typo in the
_parentparameter description.Consider applying this change:
- * @param _parent- + * @param _parent
12-28: Implementation looks good, but consider adding error handling.The query implementation is well-structured and aligns with the PR objectives. It correctly uses MongoDB's
$elemMatchoperator to find events with matching registrants, populates necessary fields while excluding sensitive information, and returns results in a lean format for better performance.Consider adding error handling to prevent unhandled promise rejections:
export const eventsAttendedByUser: QueryResolvers["eventsAttendedByUser"] = async (_parent, args) => { - const sort = getSort(args.orderBy); + try { + const sort = getSort(args.orderBy); - return await Event.find({ - registrants: { - $elemMatch: { - userId: args.id, - status: "ACTIVE", - }, - }, - }) - .sort(sort) - .populate("creatorId", "-password") - .populate("admins", "-password") - .lean(); + return await Event.find({ + registrants: { + $elemMatch: { + userId: args.id, + status: "ACTIVE", + }, + }, + }) + .sort(sort) + .populate("creatorId", "-password") + .populate("admins", "-password") + .lean(); + } catch (error) { + console.error("Error in eventsAttendedByUser:", error); + throw new Error("Failed to fetch events attended by user"); + } };This change will catch any errors that occur during the query execution, log them for debugging purposes, and throw a more user-friendly error message.
src/resolvers/Query/index.ts (1)
92-92: Approve additions with a minor suggestion for ordering.The new query resolvers
getRecurringEventsandeventsAttendedByUserhave been correctly added to theQueryobject, aligning with the PR objectives.Consider moving
eventsAttendedByUserto maintain alphabetical order within theQueryobject. This would improve consistency and make it easier to locate resolvers in the future. You can place it betweeneventandeventsByOrganization(around line 85).Also applies to: 115-115
src/typeDefs/queries.ts (2)
134-135: LGTM! Consider adding a description comment.The
getRecurringEventsquery is well-defined and aligns with the PR objectives. It correctly takes a requiredbaseRecurringEventIdparameter and returns an array ofEventobjects.Consider adding a brief description comment above the query to explain its purpose and usage. For example:
""" Retrieves all recurring events based on the provided base recurring event ID. """ getRecurringEvents(baseRecurringEventId: ID!): [Event]
203-203: LGTM! Consider minor improvements for clarity and consistency.The
eventsAttendedByUserquery is well-defined and aligns with the PR objectives. It correctly allows for optionalidandorderByparameters and returns an array ofEventobjects.Consider the following minor improvements:
Add a description comment for clarity:
""" Retrieves events attended by a user, with optional ordering. If no ID is provided, it defaults to the current authenticated user. """ eventsAttendedByUser(id: ID, orderBy: EventOrderByInput): [Event]For consistency with other queries (e.g.,
registeredEventsByUser), consider renaming theidparameter touserId:eventsAttendedByUser(userId: ID, orderBy: EventOrderByInput): [Event]If applicable, add the
@authdirective to ensure proper authentication:eventsAttendedByUser(userId: ID, orderBy: EventOrderByInput): [Event] @authsrc/models/User.ts (3)
49-49: LGTM! Consider adding JSDoc comment for clarity.The addition of
eventsAttendedto theInterfaceUserinterface is correct and aligns with the PR objectives. The typePopulatedDoc<InterfaceEvent & Document>[]is appropriate for storing references to multiple attended events.Consider adding a JSDoc comment to describe the purpose of this property, similar to other properties in the interface. For example:
/** Events that the user has attended */ eventsAttended: PopulatedDoc<InterfaceEvent & Document>[];
216-221: LGTM! Consider addingdefault: []for consistency.The addition of
eventsAttendedto the schema definition is correct and consistent with other array fields in the schema. It properly usesSchema.Types.ObjectIdand references the "Event" model.For consistency with other array fields in the schema (e.g.,
joinedOrganizations), consider adding a default empty array. This ensures that new users always have an initializedeventsAttendedarray:eventsAttended: [ { type: Schema.Types.ObjectId, ref: "Event", }, ], default: [],
49-49: Summary: Successful implementation ofeventsAttendedsupportThe changes to add the
eventsAttendedproperty to the User model have been implemented correctly. This addition aligns with the PR objectives to support tracking events attended by users. The changes are consistent across the interface definition, schema documentation, and schema implementation.These modifications enhance the User model's capabilities, allowing for better attendance tracking as requested in the linked issue #2550. The implementation will enable admins and super admins to monitor member participation in events more effectively.
To fully leverage this new feature:
- Ensure that the API endpoints for updating and querying
eventsAttendedare implemented.- Update any relevant services or resolvers to handle the new
eventsAttendedfield.- Consider adding indexes to the
eventsAttendedfield if you anticipate frequent queries based on this property.- Update the user documentation to reflect this new capability in the User model.
Also applies to: 78-78, 216-221
src/resolvers/Query/organizationsMemberConnection.ts (2)
143-143: LGTM! Consider adding type annotation foreventsAttended.The addition of the
eventsAttendedproperty aligns well with the PR objectives to support tracking events attended by members. This change enhances the user data structure returned by the query.For consistency and clarity, consider adding a type annotation for
eventsAttended. This would help maintain type safety and improve code readability. For example:eventsAttended: user.eventsAttended as SomeEventType[],Replace
SomeEventTypewith the appropriate type for events in your system.
177-177: LGTM! Consistent implementation for non-paginated results.The addition of
eventsAttendedhere maintains consistency with the earlier implementation for paginated results. This ensures that the property is included regardless of pagination, which is a good practice.As mentioned earlier, consider adding a type annotation for
eventsAttendedhere as well:eventsAttended: user.eventsAttended as SomeEventType[],This will maintain consistency and improve type safety across both mapping functions.
src/resolvers/Mutation/addEventAttendee.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-190: Consider refactoring for improved maintainability and reliabilityWhile the changes successfully implement the required functionality, there are some broader considerations for improving the overall quality and maintainability of the code:
Function Length: The
addEventAttendeefunction is quite long and handles multiple responsibilities. Consider breaking it down into smaller, more focused functions to improve readability and maintainability.Transaction Management: The function performs two separate database operations (creating an EventAttendee and updating a User). Consider wrapping these operations in a database transaction to ensure data consistency in case of failures.
Testing: Ensure that the existing tests are updated and new tests are added to cover the new functionality, particularly the user update operation.
Here's a high-level suggestion for refactoring:
- Extract the validation logic into separate functions, e.g.,
validateCurrentUser,validateEvent,validateRequestUser.- Create a separate function for the attendee creation and user update logic.
- Implement transaction management for the database operations.
- Update or add unit tests for the new functionality.
Example structure:
async function addEventAttendee(parent, args, context) { const currentUser = await validateCurrentUser(context.userId); const event = await validateEvent(args.data.eventId); const requestUser = await validateRequestUser(args.data.userId, event); return await createAttendeeAndUpdateUser(args.data); } async function createAttendeeAndUpdateUser(data) { const session = await mongoose.startSession(); session.startTransaction(); try { await EventAttendee.create([data], { session }); const updatedUser = await User.findByIdAndUpdate( data.userId, { $push: { eventsAttended: data.eventId.toString() } }, { new: true, session } ); if (!updatedUser) { throw new errors.NotFoundError(/* ... */); } await session.commitTransaction(); return updatedUser; } catch (error) { await session.abortTransaction(); // Log error and throw appropriate error } finally { session.endSession(); } }This refactoring would improve the code's maintainability, readability, and reliability.
tests/resolvers/Query/organizationsMemberConnection.spec.ts (2)
890-890: LGTM: Consistent addition ofeventsAttendedproperty with refactor suggestionThe
eventsAttendedproperty is consistently added to the user object in this test case, maintaining uniformity across the test suite. However, given the repetitive nature of this change across multiple test cases, consider refactoring the user object creation into a helper function to reduce code duplication and improve maintainability.Consider creating a helper function to generate the user object with the
eventsAttendedproperty:function createUserObjectWithEventsAttended(user: any) { return { _id: user._id, appUserProfileId: user.appUserProfileId, // ... other properties ... eventsAttended: user.eventsAttended, }; }Then use this helper function in all test cases:
const usersWithPassword = users.map(createUserObjectWithEventsAttended);This refactoring will make the tests more maintainable and reduce the risk of inconsistencies when adding or modifying user properties in the future.
Line range hint
250-1145: Overall: Well-implemented feature with room for refactoringThe addition of the
eventsAttendedproperty to user objects is consistently implemented across all relevant test cases. This change aligns well with the PR objectives of adding support for tracking events attended by users. The comprehensive test coverage ensures that the new feature is thoroughly validated across various scenarios.While the implementation is correct, there's an opportunity to improve code maintainability:
- Consider refactoring the user object creation into a helper function to reduce repetition across test cases.
- Ensure that the
eventsAttendedproperty is properly documented in the relevant schema or interface definitions (not shown in this file).Great job on implementing this feature and maintaining consistent test coverage!
To further improve the codebase:
- Update any relevant documentation to reflect the addition of the
eventsAttendedproperty.- If not already done, ensure that the GraphQL schema is updated to include the
eventsAttendedfield in the User type.- Consider adding specific test cases that validate the behavior of the
eventsAttendedproperty, such as checking if it's populated correctly or testing queries that filter users based on attended events.src/resolvers/Mutation/checkIn.ts (1)
190-209: Add unit tests for the new user update logicThe addition of the user's
eventsAttendedupdate in thecheckInresolver introduces new functionality that should be tested. Please add unit tests to cover scenarios such as successful updates, failure cases, and error handling to ensure reliability.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
- schema.graphql (3 hunks)
- src/models/User.ts (3 hunks)
- src/resolvers/Mutation/addEventAttendee.ts (1 hunks)
- src/resolvers/Mutation/checkIn.ts (1 hunks)
- src/resolvers/Query/eventsAttendedByUser.ts (1 hunks)
- src/resolvers/Query/getRecurringEvents.ts (1 hunks)
- src/resolvers/Query/index.ts (3 hunks)
- src/resolvers/Query/organizationsMemberConnection.ts (2 hunks)
- src/typeDefs/queries.ts (2 hunks)
- src/typeDefs/types.ts (1 hunks)
- src/types/generatedGraphQLTypes.ts (8 hunks)
- tests/resolvers/Query/organizationsMemberConnection.spec.ts (10 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (22)
src/resolvers/Query/getRecurringEvents.ts (3)
1-2: LGTM: Appropriate imports for the resolver.The import statements are correct and follow good practices:
- Importing types from generated GraphQL types ensures type safety.
- Importing the Event model is necessary for database operations.
11-14: LGTM: Well-typed resolver function signature.The function signature is correctly implemented:
- It uses the appropriate type annotation from
QueryResolvers.- The parameters match the expected resolver signature (
_parentandargs).This ensures type safety and consistency with the GraphQL schema.
15-25: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionEnhance error handling and consider edge cases.
The implementation is generally correct, but there are a few areas for improvement:
- Consider handling the case where no events are found.
- The error message in the catch block could be more specific.
Consider applying the following changes:
try { const recurringEvents = await Event.find({ baseRecurringEventId: args.baseRecurringEventId, }).lean(); + if (recurringEvents.length === 0) { + console.log(`No recurring events found for baseRecurringEventId: ${args.baseRecurringEventId}`); + } return recurringEvents; } catch (error) { - console.error("Error fetching recurring events:", error); + console.error(`Error fetching recurring events for baseRecurringEventId ${args.baseRecurringEventId}:`, error); throw error; }Let's verify if there are any other places in the codebase where we might need to update the error handling or logging for consistency:
This will help us ensure consistent error handling across query resolvers.
src/resolvers/Query/eventsAttendedByUser.ts (1)
1-3: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and concise.The imports cover all necessary dependencies for the query resolver, including types, models, and helper functions.
src/resolvers/Query/index.ts (3)
56-57: LGTM: New imports align with PR objectives.The new imports for
eventsAttendedByUserandgetRecurringEventsare correctly added and align with the PR objectives of enhancing event attendance tracking and supporting recurring events.
Line range hint
1-115: Overall, the changes look good with minor suggestions.The additions to
src/resolvers/Query/index.tsalign well with the PR objectives of adding support for events attended and recurring events. The new imports and query resolvers have been correctly integrated into the existing structure.To further improve the implementation:
- Consider reordering
eventsAttendedByUserin theQueryobject to maintain alphabetical order.- Ensure that the GraphQL schema has been updated accordingly.
- Verify the correct implementation of the new resolver functions in their respective files.
These changes will enhance the attendance tracking system as intended, providing valuable functionality for admins and super admins.
56-57: Verify schema updates and resolver implementations.The new query resolvers
eventsAttendedByUserandgetRecurringEventshave been added to theQueryobject. To ensure completeness:
- Verify that the GraphQL schema has been updated to include these new queries.
- Confirm that the resolver functions in
./eventsAttendedByUser.tsand./getRecurringEvents.tsare implemented correctly.Run the following script to check for schema updates and resolver implementations:
Also applies to: 92-92, 115-115
✅ Verification successful
Schema and resolver implementations verified.
The GraphQL schema includes the new queries
eventsAttendedByUserandgetRecurringEvents. The resolver functions insrc/resolvers/Query/eventsAttendedByUser.tsandsrc/resolvers/Query/getRecurringEvents.tshave been implemented correctly.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify schema updates and resolver implementations for new queries. # Test 1: Check if the GraphQL schema includes the new queries echo "Checking GraphQL schema for new queries:" rg --type graphql 'eventsAttendedByUser|getRecurringEvents' # Test 2: Verify the existence and content of resolver implementation files echo "Checking resolver implementation files:" cat src/resolvers/Query/eventsAttendedByUser.ts echo "---" cat src/resolvers/Query/getRecurringEvents.tsLength of output: 2076
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify schema updates and resolver implementations for new queries. # Test 1: Check if the GraphQL schema includes the new queries by searching within .graphql files echo "Checking GraphQL schema for new queries in .graphql files:" rg 'eventsAttendedByUser|getRecurringEvents' --glob '*.graphql' # Test 2: Verify the existence and content of resolver implementation files echo "Checking resolver implementation files:" cat src/resolvers/Query/eventsAttendedByUser.ts echo "---" cat src/resolvers/Query/getRecurringEvents.tsLength of output: 2239
src/typeDefs/queries.ts (1)
134-135: Summary: New queries successfully implement required functionality.The two new queries,
getRecurringEventsandeventsAttendedByUser, successfully implement the functionality required for tracking events attended by users and fetching recurring events. These additions align well with the PR objectives and enhance the GraphQL API's capabilities for event management.The queries are well-structured and consistent with the existing codebase. Minor suggestions for improvements have been provided in the individual review comments.
To ensure that these new queries are properly integrated and don't conflict with existing functionality, please run the following verification script:
This script will help verify the proper integration of the new queries and identify any potential conflicts or incomplete implementations.
Also applies to: 203-203
✅ Verification successful
Action Required: Update Verification Scripts to Correctly Target TypeScript Files
The previous verification scripts failed because
rgdoes not recognizetypescriptas a valid file type. To resolve this, please use the following updated scripts to target TypeScript files by their extensions:Please run these updated scripts to continue the verification process.
Verification Successful: New Queries Properly Implemented
The shell script results confirm that both
getRecurringEventsandeventsAttendedByUserqueries are uniquely defined in the schema and have corresponding resolver functions. Additionally, no related TODO comments were found, indicating that the integration is complete and without conflicts.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of new queries and check for potential conflicts # Test 1: Check if the new queries are unique in the schema echo "Checking for query uniqueness:" rg --type typescript -e 'getRecurringEvents' -e 'eventsAttendedByUser' src/ # Test 2: Verify that corresponding resolver functions exist echo "Checking for resolver functions:" rg --type typescript -e 'getRecurringEvents' -e 'eventsAttendedByUser' src/resolvers/ # Test 3: Look for any TODO comments related to these new features echo "Checking for related TODO comments:" rg --type typescript -e 'TODO.*getRecurringEvents' -e 'TODO.*eventsAttendedByUser' -e 'TODO.*event.*attend' src/Length of output: 604
Script:
# Updated Verification Script #!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of new queries and check for potential conflicts # Test 1: Check if the new queries are unique in the schema echo "Checking for query uniqueness:" rg --glob "*.ts" -e 'getRecurringEvents' -e 'eventsAttendedByUser' src/ # Test 2: Verify that corresponding resolver functions exist echo "Checking for resolver functions:" rg --glob "*.ts" -e 'getRecurringEvents' -e 'eventsAttendedByUser' src/resolvers/ # Test 3: Look for any TODO comments related to these new features echo "Checking for related TODO comments:" rg --glob "*.ts" -e 'TODO.*getRecurringEvents' -e 'TODO.*eventsAttendedByUser' -e 'TODO.*event.*attend' src/Length of output: 2278
src/models/User.ts (1)
78-78: LGTM! Documentation updated correctly.The addition of the
eventsAttendeddescription to the schema documentation is consistent with the existing style and accurately describes the purpose of the new property.src/resolvers/Query/organizationsMemberConnection.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-194: Overall changes look good. Verify related schema updates.The changes to add the
eventsAttendedproperty to the user objects in both mapping functions are consistent and align well with the PR objectives. This enhancement will allow for better tracking of event attendance as requested.To ensure full compatibility, please verify that the
Usermodel and GraphQL schema have been updated to include theeventsAttendedfield. Run the following script to check for these updates:If the script doesn't find the
eventsAttendedfield in these files, please ensure they are updated accordingly to maintain consistency across the codebase.✅ Verification successful
|
Please fix the failing tests and ensure that the coderabbit.ai suggestions are applied |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
src/resolvers/Mutation/checkIn.ts (4)
Line range hint
40-89: LGTM: Improved user and event retrieval with cachingThe implementation now efficiently checks both cache and database for the current user and event, caching the results when necessary. This approach enhances performance and ensures data consistency. The error handling is appropriate for cases where the user or event is not found.
Consider adding debug logging for cache hits and misses to aid in monitoring and optimizing cache performance.
Line range hint
91-106: LGTM: Robust authorization checks implementedThe authorization logic has been improved, ensuring that only event admins or superadmins can perform check-ins. The use of
mongoose.Types.ObjectIdfor comparison is correct and prevents potential issues with string comparisons.Consider extracting the authorization check into a separate function for improved readability and reusability. For example:
const isAuthorizedToCheckIn = (user: InterfaceUser, event: InterfaceEvent): boolean => { const isUserEventAdmin = event.admins.some((admin) => new mongoose.Types.ObjectId(admin.toString()).equals(user._id.toString()) ); return isUserEventAdmin || user.appUserProfile?.isSuperAdmin === true; }; // Usage if (!isAuthorizedToCheckIn(currentUser, currentEvent)) { throw new errors.UnauthorizedError( requestContext.translate(USER_NOT_AUTHORIZED_ERROR.MESSAGE), USER_NOT_AUTHORIZED_ERROR.CODE, USER_NOT_AUTHORIZED_ERROR.PARAM ); }
Line range hint
108-188: LGTM: Comprehensive attendee check-in logic implementedThe attendee check-in logic handles all possible scenarios correctly, including creating new records when necessary and preventing duplicate check-ins. The error handling is appropriate for the conflict case.
Consider using a MongoDB transaction to ensure data consistency across the multiple operations. This would prevent partial updates in case of failures during the check-in process. Here's an example of how you could implement this:
const session = await mongoose.startSession(); session.startTransaction(); try { // Existing logic for creating or updating EventAttendee and CheckIn // Use the session in all database operations await session.commitTransaction(); } catch (error) { await session.abortTransaction(); throw error; // Re-throw the error after rolling back } finally { session.endSession(); }This approach ensures that all database operations either succeed together or fail without leaving the database in an inconsistent state.
Line range hint
1-189: LGTM: Well-structured implementation with consistent error handlingThe overall structure of the
checkInresolver is clear, maintainable, and follows a logical flow. Error handling is consistent throughout the function, using custom error types appropriately. The return value (the created CheckIn object) is consistent with the expected behavior.Consider breaking down the large function into smaller, more focused helper functions to improve readability and testability. For example:
const validateAndGetCurrentUser = async (userId: string): Promise<InterfaceUser> => { // Logic to retrieve and validate current user }; const validateAndGetEvent = async (eventId: string): Promise<InterfaceEvent> => { // Logic to retrieve and validate event }; const performCheckIn = async (eventId: string, userId: string): Promise<CheckIn> => { // Logic to perform the actual check-in }; export const checkIn: MutationResolvers["checkIn"] = async (_parent, args, context) => { const currentUser = await validateAndGetCurrentUser(context.userId); const event = await validateAndGetEvent(args.data.eventId); if (!isAuthorizedToCheckIn(currentUser, event)) { throw new errors.UnauthorizedError(/* ... */); } return performCheckIn(args.data.eventId, args.data.userId); };This structure would make the main
checkInfunction more concise and easier to understand at a glance, while also making individual pieces of logic more testable.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- src/resolvers/Mutation/addEventAttendee.ts (1 hunks)
- src/resolvers/Mutation/checkIn.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/resolvers/Mutation/addEventAttendee.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/resolvers/Mutation/checkIn.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-189: LGTM: Imports and function signature are well-structuredThe imports are comprehensive, including all necessary models, errors, and cache-related functions. The function signature remains unchanged and aligns well with the enhanced implementation.
tests/resolvers/Mutation/addEventAttendee.spec.ts (1)
185-185: LGTM!The assertion correctly checks that
payloadcontains the expected user data.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #2551 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 98.44% 98.44%
========================================
Files 342 344 +2
Lines 16734 16784 +50
Branches 2408 2412 +4
========================================
+ Hits 16473 16523 +50
Misses 258 258
Partials 3 3 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
tests/resolvers/Query/getRecurringEvents.spec.ts (2)
19-78: LGTM: Well-structured test case with proper setup and assertions.The test case effectively verifies the main functionality of
getRecurringEvents. It sets up test data, calls the function, and asserts the expected results. The cleanup step is also properly implemented.Consider adding an assertion to verify that the third event (with a different
baseRecurringEventId) is not included in the result. This would further strengthen the test case:expect(result.some(event => event.title === "Event 3")).toBe(false);🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Check for linting, formatting, and type errors
[warning] 70-70:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
88-101: LGTM: Good error handling test with proper mocking.This test case effectively verifies the error handling of
getRecurringEventswhen a database error occurs. The use ofvi.spyOn()for mocking and the subsequent restoration of the mock are well-implemented.Consider adding a more specific error message assertion to ensure that the exact error from the database is propagated:
await expect(getRecurringEvents({}, args, {} as any)).rejects.toThrow("Database error");This change would make the test more robust by verifying not just that an error is thrown, but that it's the specific error we expect.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Check for linting, formatting, and type errors
[warning] 95-95:
Unexpected any. Specify a different typetests/resolvers/Query/eventAttendedByUser.spec.ts (4)
9-11: Improve type declarations and remove unused variable.Consider the following improvements:
- Replace
anytypes with more specific types for better type safety.- Remove the unused
testEventsvariable or use it in the tests if needed.Here's a suggested improvement:
let MONGOOSE_INSTANCE: typeof mongoose; let testUser: User; // Remove or use the following line // let testEvents: Event[];🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Check for linting, formatting, and type errors
[warning] 10-10:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[failure] 11-11:
'testEvents' is assigned a value but never used
[warning] 11-11:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
13-67: Comprehensive test setup, consider type improvements.The test setup is well-structured and covers various scenarios needed for testing. It creates a test user and three events with different statuses, which is excellent for thorough testing.
Consider using more specific types instead of
anyfortestUserandtestEvents:let testUser: User; let testEvents: Event[];This will improve type safety and make the code more maintainable.
75-91: Well-structured test cases, consider improving type safety.The test cases are comprehensive and cover important scenarios. However, the use of
{} as anyfor the context parameter ineventsAttendedByUsercalls could be improved for better type safety.Consider creating a mock context object with the necessary properties instead of using
{} as any. For example:const mockContext = { // Add any necessary properties for the context }; const result = await eventsAttendedByUser({}, args, mockContext);This will improve type safety and make the tests more robust.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Check for linting, formatting, and type errors
[warning] 78-78:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 87-87:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
107-117: Enhance sorting test case.The sorting test case is good but uses a hardcoded sorting option. Consider expanding this test to cover multiple sorting scenarios.
Suggestion:
- Add more test cases with different sorting options (e.g., "title_ASC", "startDate_DESC").
- Use a parameterized test to cover multiple sorting scenarios efficiently.
Example:
it.each([ ['title_DESC', 'Event 2', 'Event 1'], ['title_ASC', 'Event 1', 'Event 2'], // Add more scenarios as needed ])('sorts events based on %s', async (orderBy, firstTitle, secondTitle) => { const args = { id: testUser._id.toString(), orderBy, }; const result = await eventsAttendedByUser({}, args, mockContext); expect(result[0].title).toBe(firstTitle); expect(result[1].title).toBe(secondTitle); });🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Check for linting, formatting, and type errors
[warning] 112-112:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- src/resolvers/Mutation/addEventAttendee.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/resolvers/Mutation/addEventAttendee.spec.ts (3 hunks)
- tests/resolvers/Query/eventAttendedByUser.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/resolvers/Query/getRecurringEvents.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- src/resolvers/Mutation/addEventAttendee.ts
- tests/resolvers/Mutation/addEventAttendee.spec.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: Check for linting, formatting, and type errors
tests/resolvers/Query/eventAttendedByUser.spec.ts
[warning] 10-10:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[failure] 11-11:
'testEvents' is assigned a value but never used
[warning] 11-11:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 78-78:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 87-87:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 102-102:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 112-112:
Unexpected any. Specify a different typetests/resolvers/Query/getRecurringEvents.spec.ts
[warning] 70-70:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 83-83:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 95-95:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
🔇 Additional comments (5)
tests/resolvers/Query/getRecurringEvents.spec.ts (3)
1-17: LGTM: Imports and setup/teardown logic are well-structured.The import statements cover all necessary dependencies, and the MongoDB connection setup and teardown are correctly implemented using Vitest's
beforeAllandafterAllhooks. This ensures proper isolation for each test run.
80-86: LGTM: Concise test for empty result scenario.This test case effectively verifies the behavior of
getRecurringEventswhen no matching events are found. It uses a non-existent ID to trigger the empty result scenario, which is a good practice.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Check for linting, formatting, and type errors
[warning] 83-83:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
1-101: Overall, well-structured and comprehensive test suite forgetRecurringEvents.The test file covers the main scenarios for the
getRecurringEventsresolver, including successful retrieval, empty results, and error handling. The setup, teardown, and individual test cases are well-implemented.A few minor improvements have been suggested:
- Adding an extra assertion in the first test case to verify exclusion of non-matching events.
- Enhancing the error handling test with a more specific error message assertion.
- Replacing
anytypes with a more specificGraphQLContexttype.These changes will further improve the robustness and maintainability of the test suite.
Great job on implementing these tests! They will help ensure the reliability of the
getRecurringEventsfunctionality.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Check for linting, formatting, and type errors
[warning] 70-70:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 83-83:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 95-95:
Unexpected any. Specify a different typetests/resolvers/Query/eventAttendedByUser.spec.ts (2)
69-73: LGTM: Proper teardown logic.The afterAll hook correctly cleans up the database by deleting all users and events, and then disconnects from the mongoose instance. This ensures a clean state after the tests and prevents any leftover data from affecting future test runs.
1-117: Overall assessment: Well-structured and comprehensive test suite.This test file for the
eventsAttendedByUserresolver is well-organized and covers essential scenarios. The setup and teardown logic are properly implemented, ensuring a clean test environment. The test cases effectively validate the resolver's functionality for different user scenarios and sorting options.Key points:
- Good coverage of different event statuses and user scenarios.
- Proper database setup and cleanup.
- Well-structured test cases with clear assertions.
Suggestions for improvement:
- Enhance type safety by replacing
anytypes with more specific types.- Create a mock context object for better type checking in resolver calls.
- Expand the sorting test case to cover more scenarios.
These improvements will further enhance the quality and maintainability of the test suite.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Check for linting, formatting, and type errors
[warning] 10-10:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[failure] 11-11:
'testEvents' is assigned a value but never used
[warning] 11-11:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 78-78:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 87-87:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 102-102:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 112-112:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
tests/resolvers/Query/getRecurringEvents.spec.ts (1)
1-99: Great test coverage with room for minor improvements.The test suite for
getRecurringEventsis comprehensive and well-structured, covering the happy path, empty result scenario, and error handling. The use of Vitest and proper setup/teardown procedures is commendable.To improve consistency and type safety throughout the file:
- Define a
GraphQLContexttype at the top of the file.- Replace all instances of
{} as unknownwith{} as GraphQLContext.This change will enhance type safety and make the tests more maintainable.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- src/resolvers/Query/getRecurringEvents.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/resolvers/Query/eventAttendedByUser.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/resolvers/Query/getRecurringEvents.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- src/resolvers/Query/getRecurringEvents.ts
- tests/resolvers/Query/eventAttendedByUser.spec.ts
🔇 Additional comments (2)
tests/resolvers/Query/getRecurringEvents.spec.ts (2)
1-19: LGTM: Imports and global variables are well-structured.The imports and global variable declarations are appropriate for the test file. The use of
dotenv/configensures that environment variables are properly loaded, which is a good practice for managing configuration.
20-29: LGTM: Proper setup and teardown procedures.The
beforeAllandafterAllhooks effectively manage the test environment. Creating test users and organizations ensures test isolation, while proper database connection and disconnection maintain a clean state between test runs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
tests/resolvers/Query/eventsAttendedByUser.spec.ts (1)
15-25: Consider adding data cleanup in theafterAllhook.The setup and teardown processes are well-structured. However, it's a good practice to clean up the test data after the tests are complete. This ensures a clean state for subsequent test runs and prevents potential interference between different test suites.
Consider adding cleanup logic in the
afterAllhook:afterAll(async () => { // Clean up test data await Event.deleteMany({ creatorId: testUser?._id }); await TestOrganization.findByIdAndDelete(testOrganization?._id); await TestUser.findByIdAndDelete(testUser?._id); await disconnect(MONGOOSE_INSTANCE); });tests/resolvers/Query/getRecurringEvents.spec.ts (2)
20-30: Setup and teardown procedures are well-implemented.The
beforeAllandafterAllhooks properly manage the database connection and test data creation. This ensures a clean and isolated test environment for each test run.Consider adding error handling in the
beforeAllhook to catch and log any setup failures, which could help in debugging if the setup process fails:beforeAll(async () => { try { MONGOOSE_INSTANCE = await connect(); const result = await createTestUserAndOrganization(); testUser = result[0]; testOrganization = result[1]; testAdminUser = await createTestUser(); } catch (error) { console.error("Test setup failed:", error); throw error; } });
83-90: Good coverage of the empty result scenario.This test case effectively verifies the behavior when no recurring events are found for a given
baseRecurringEventId. It's important to test this edge case.For consistency and improved type safety, apply the same type improvements suggested in the previous test case:
const getRecurringEventsFunction = getRecurringEvents as GetRecurringEventsFunction;Also, consider adding a descriptive comment explaining the purpose of using a non-existent ID in this test case.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Check for linting, formatting, and type errors
[warning] 86-86:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 86-86:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 86-86:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 86-86:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- tests/resolvers/Query/eventsAttendedByUser.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/resolvers/Query/getRecurringEvents.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: Check for linting, formatting, and type errors
tests/resolvers/Query/getRecurringEvents.spec.ts
[warning] 73-73:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 73-73:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 73-73:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 73-73:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 86-86:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 86-86:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 86-86:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 86-86:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 98-98:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 98-98:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
🔇 Additional comments (5)
tests/resolvers/Query/eventsAttendedByUser.spec.ts (1)
1-14: LGTM: Imports and type declarations are appropriate.The imports cover all necessary modules and types for the test file. The use of TypeScript for type declarations is correct and enhances code readability and type safety.
tests/resolvers/Query/getRecurringEvents.spec.ts (4)
1-19: Imports and type declarations look good.The imports and type declarations are well-organized and appropriate for the test file. Good job on using helper files for test data types and including necessary dependencies.
1-106: Overall, excellent test coverage with room for minor improvements.This test file provides comprehensive coverage for the
getRecurringEventsfunction, including happy path, empty result, and error handling scenarios. The structure is clear, and the use of beforeAll and afterAll hooks ensures proper setup and teardown.To further enhance the quality of these tests:
- Implement consistent type safety improvements across all test cases.
- Consider creating helper functions for common operations like creating test events.
- Add more specific error messages and assertions in the error handling test.
These changes will improve maintainability and make the tests even more robust. Great job on writing thorough tests for this functionality!
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Check for linting, formatting, and type errors
[warning] 73-73:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 73-73:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 73-73:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 73-73:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 86-86:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 86-86:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 86-86:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 86-86:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 98-98:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 98-98:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
92-106: Effective error handling test case.This test case successfully verifies that the
getRecurringEventsfunction throws an error when there's a problem fetching events from the database. The use of mocking to simulate a database error is a good practice.Consider the following improvements:
Apply the same type improvements suggested in the previous test cases for consistency and improved type safety.
Use a more specific error message in the mock implementation to differentiate it from other potential database errors:
throw new Error("Error fetching recurring events");
- Add an assertion to verify that the mock function was called with the expected arguments:
expect(mockFind).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ baseRecurringEventId: expect.any(String) });To ensure that error handling is consistently implemented across the codebase, run the following script:
This will help identify if similar generic error messages are used elsewhere, which might benefit from more specific error handling.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Check for linting, formatting, and type errors
[warning] 98-98:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 98-98:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
32-81: Good test coverage for the happy path scenario.This test case effectively verifies that the
getRecurringEventsfunction returns the expected list of recurring events. The setup, execution, and cleanup of the test data are well-structured.Consider the following improvements:
- Replace the
as unknown astype casting with a more type-safe approach. Define an interface for thegetRecurringEventsfunction and use it for typing:interface GetRecurringEventsFunction { (parent: any, args: { baseRecurringEventId: string }, context: any): Promise<any[]>; } const getRecurringEventsFunction = getRecurringEvents as GetRecurringEventsFunction;
Use more specific types for the function parameters and return value to improve type safety.
Consider using a helper function to create test events to reduce duplication and improve maintainability.
To ensure that the
getRecurringEventsfunction is correctly typed in its original declaration, run the following script:✅ Verification successful
Good test coverage for the happy path scenario.
This test case effectively verifies that the
getRecurringEventsfunction returns the expected list of recurring events. The setup, execution, and cleanup of the test data are well-structured.Consider the following improvements:
Replace the
as unknown astype casting with a more type-safe approach. Define an interface for thegetRecurringEventsfunction and use it for typing:interface GetRecurringEventsFunction { (parent: any, args: { baseRecurringEventId: string }, context: any): Promise<any[]>; } const getRecurringEventsFunction = getRecurringEvents as GetRecurringEventsFunction;Use more specific types for the function parameters and return value to enhance type safety.
Consider using a helper function to create test events to reduce duplication and improve maintainability.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the type declaration of getRecurringEvents function ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'export const getRecurringEvents = async ( _: any, args: { baseRecurringEventId: string }, context: any ): Promise<$_> => { $$$ }'Length of output: 254
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the type declaration of getRecurringEvents function ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'export const getRecurringEvents = async ( _: any, args: { baseRecurringEventId: string }, context: any ): Promise<$_> => { $$$ }'Length of output: 177
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for getRecurringEvents function declarations with type annotations ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern ' export function getRecurringEvents($_): Promise<$_> { $$$ } ' || ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern ' export const getRecurringEvents = async ( $_ ): Promise<$_> => { $$$ } 'Length of output: 104
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for any declarations of getRecurringEvents function, regardless of export style # Using ast-grep to find function declarations ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern ' function getRecurringEvents($_): $_ { $$$ } ' || ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern ' const getRecurringEvents = async ($_): Promise<$_> => { $$$ } ' # Using ripgrep with correct file type to find any occurrence of getRecurringEvents rg --type ts 'getRecurringEvents'Length of output: 1898
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Check for linting, formatting, and type errors
[warning] 73-73:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 73-73:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 73-73:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 73-73:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
tests/resolvers/Query/getRecurringEvents.spec.ts (5)
1-30: LGTM! Consider adding a GraphQL context type.The import statements and setup code look good. The use of Vitest for testing and Mongoose for database operations is appropriate. The setup and teardown hooks are well-implemented.
To improve type safety, consider defining a type for your GraphQL context. This will help address the
anytype warnings in the rest of the file. Add something like this at the beginning of the file:type GraphQLContext = { // Add relevant properties of your GraphQL context };This type can then be used instead of
anyfor the context parameter in the test cases.
32-85: Good test structure. Improve type safety.The test case is well-structured and effectively tests the main functionality of
getRecurringEvents. However, there are some type safety improvements that can be made:
- Replace the
anytypes with more specific types:const getRecurringEventsFunction = getRecurringEvents as ( parent: {}, args: { baseRecurringEventId: string }, context: GraphQLContext ) => Promise<any[]>;
- Consider defining a type for the return value of
getRecurringEventsinstead of usingany[].These changes will improve type safety and make the code more maintainable. They will also address the static analysis warnings about using
anytypes.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Check for linting, formatting, and type errors
[warning] 74-74:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 75-75:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 76-76:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 77-77:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
87-98: Good edge case coverage. Apply type safety improvements.This test case effectively checks the behavior when no recurring events are found, which is an important edge case to cover. The logic is sound and well-implemented.
Apply the same type safety improvements suggested in the previous comment:
const getRecurringEventsFunction = getRecurringEvents as ( parent: {}, args: { baseRecurringEventId: string }, context: GraphQLContext ) => Promise<any[]>;This will address the static analysis warnings and improve the overall type safety of the test.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Check for linting, formatting, and type errors
[warning] 91-91:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 92-92:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 93-93:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 94-94:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
100-117: Effective error handling test. Enhance type safety and error assertion.This test case successfully verifies the error handling behavior of
getRecurringEvents. The use of Vitest's mocking capabilities to simulate a database error is well-implemented.
- Apply the same type safety improvements as suggested in previous comments:
const getRecurringEventsFunction = getRecurringEvents as ( parent: {}, args: { baseRecurringEventId: string }, context: GraphQLContext ) => Promise<any[]>;
- Consider using a more specific error message in the expect statement:
await expect(getRecurringEventsFunction({}, args, {})).rejects.toThrow( "Error fetching recurring events: Database error" );This change will make the test more robust by ensuring that the specific error message from
getRecurringEventsis being thrown, not just any error with the text "Database error".🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Check for linting, formatting, and type errors
[warning] 107-107:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 108-108:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
1-118: Well-structured tests with room for type safety improvementsOverall, this test file provides comprehensive coverage for the
getRecurringEventsfunction, including main functionality, edge cases, and error handling. The use of Vitest and Mongoose for testing is appropriate, and the test cases are well-structured.Main areas for improvement:
Type safety: Consistently replace
anytypes with more specific types throughout the file. Define and use aGraphQLContexttype for the context parameter.Function typing: Instead of using type assertions, define the correct type for the
getRecurringEventsfunction and use it consistently in all test cases.Error specificity: In the error handling test, use a more specific error message to ensure the exact error from
getRecurringEventsis being caught.Implementing these improvements will enhance the maintainability and reliability of the tests. If you need any assistance in making these changes, please let me know.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Check for linting, formatting, and type errors
[warning] 74-74:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 75-75:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 76-76:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 77-77:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 91-91:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 92-92:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 93-93:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 94-94:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 107-107:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 108-108:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- tests/resolvers/Query/eventsAttendedByUser.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/resolvers/Query/getRecurringEvents.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- tests/resolvers/Query/eventsAttendedByUser.spec.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: Check for linting, formatting, and type errors
tests/resolvers/Query/getRecurringEvents.spec.ts
[warning] 74-74:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 75-75:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 76-76:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 77-77:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 91-91:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 92-92:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 93-93:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 94-94:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 107-107:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 108-108:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/resolvers/Query/index.ts (1)
86-86: Maintain alphabetical order in the Query object.While the new query resolvers
getRecurringEventsandeventsAttendedByUserhave been correctly added to the Query object, their placement doesn't maintain the alphabetical order of the properties. Consider reordering the properties to maintain consistency and improve readability.Here's a suggested reordering:
export const Query: QueryResolvers = { actionItemsByEvent, agendaCategory, getAgendaItem, getAgendaSection, getAllAgendaItems, actionItemsByOrganization, actionItemCategoriesByOrganization, agendaItemByEvent, agendaItemByOrganization, agendaItemCategoriesByOrganization, advertisementsConnection, chatById, chatsByUserId, checkAuth, customDataByOrganization, customFieldsByOrganization, event, + eventsAttendedByUser, eventsByOrganization, eventsByOrganizationConnection, fundsByOrganization, getAllNotesForAgendaItems, getCommunityData, getDonationById, getDonationByOrgId, getDonationByOrgIdConnection, getEventAttendee, getEventAttendeesByEventId, getEventInvitesByUserId, getEventVolunteerGroups, getFundById, getFundraisingCampaigns, getlanguage, getNoteById, getPledgesByUserId, getPlugins, + getRecurringEvents, getUserTag, getUserTagAncestors, getVenueByOrgId, isSampleOrganization, me, myLanguage, organizations, organizationsConnection, organizationsMemberConnection, post, registeredEventsByUser, user, userLanguage, users, usersConnection, venue, - getRecurringEvents, - eventsAttendedByUser, };Also applies to: 109-109
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- schema.graphql (3 hunks)
- src/resolvers/Query/index.ts (3 hunks)
- src/typeDefs/queries.ts (2 hunks)
- src/typeDefs/types.ts (1 hunks)
- src/types/generatedGraphQLTypes.ts (8 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- src/typeDefs/queries.ts
- src/typeDefs/types.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (12)
src/resolvers/Query/index.ts (3)
53-54: LGTM: New imports added correctly.The new imports for
eventsAttendedByUserandgetRecurringEventsare correctly added and align with the PR objectives of supporting events attended and recurring events.
Line range hint
1-110: Overall, the changes look good with minor suggestions.The additions to
src/resolvers/Query/index.tsalign well with the PR objectives of adding support for events attended and recurring events. The new imports and query resolvers have been correctly added. Consider the suggested reordering for better consistency, and ensure that the new resolvers are properly implemented in their respective files.
53-54: Verify implementation of new resolvers.The new query resolvers
eventsAttendedByUserandgetRecurringEventsalign with the PR objectives. However, it's important to ensure that these resolvers are implemented correctly in their respective files.Run the following script to verify the implementation of the new resolvers:
Also applies to: 86-86, 109-109
✅ Verification successful
Implementation of new resolvers verified.
The new query resolvers
eventsAttendedByUserandgetRecurringEventsare implemented correctly and align with the PR objectives.
- Applies to: 86-86, 109-109
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of new resolvers # Test: Check if the resolver files exist and contain the expected function definitions echo "Checking eventsAttendedByUser implementation:" cat src/resolvers/Query/eventsAttendedByUser.ts echo "\nChecking getRecurringEvents implementation:" cat src/resolvers/Query/getRecurringEvents.tsLength of output: 2066
schema.graphql (4)
1801-1802: New fieldeventsAttendedadded to User typeThe new field
eventsAttended: [Event]has been added to theUsertype. This addition aligns with the PR objective of tracking events attended by members.This change enables querying the events a user has attended, which is a crucial feature for the new attendance tracking system.
1477-1478: New queryeventsAttendedByUseradded to Query typeA new query
eventsAttendedByUser(id: ID, orderBy: EventOrderByInput): [Event]has been added to theQuerytype. This addition complements the neweventsAttendedfield in theUsertype.This query allows fetching events attended by a specific user, with optional ordering. The implementation looks correct and aligns with the PR objectives.
1499-1500: New querygetRecurringEventsadded to Query typeA new query
getRecurringEvents(baseRecurringEventId: ID!): [Event]has been added to theQuerytype. This addition aligns with the PR objective of fetching recurring events based on their base recurring event ID.This query enables retrieving all instances of a recurring event, which is useful for managing and displaying recurring events in the system.
Line range hint
1477-1802: Summary of changesThe changes introduced in this PR successfully implement the required functionality for tracking events attended by users and managing recurring events. The additions include:
- A new
eventsAttendedfield in theUsertype.- A new
eventsAttendedByUserquery in theQuerytype.- A new
getRecurringEventsquery in theQuerytype.These changes are well-integrated into the existing schema and use consistent types and naming conventions. They provide the necessary GraphQL schema support for the new attendance tracking system and recurring event management.
The implementation aligns well with the PR objectives and appears to be ready for integration, pending any additional backend logic or resolver implementations that may be required to support these new schema elements.
src/types/generatedGraphQLTypes.ts (5)
2217-2217: Addition ofeventsAttendedByUserQueryThe new
eventsAttendedByUserfield in theQuerytype correctly extends the API to fetch events attended by a user.
2239-2239: Addition ofgetRecurringEventsQueryThe inclusion of
getRecurringEventsin theQuerytype appropriately allows retrieval of recurring events based on a specified ID.
2347-2350: Previous review comment is still validThe suggestion to rename the argument
idtouserIdfor clarity and to consider making it a required field remains applicable.
2459-2461: Correct Definition ofQueryGetRecurringEventsArgsThe
baseRecurringEventIdparameter is properly defined as a required field, ensuring the query functions as intended.
2861-2861: Addition ofeventsAttendedField toUserTypeThe
eventsAttendedfield enhances theUsertype by providing direct access to events a user has attended.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if either of these two conditions occur:
- The overall code coverage drops below the target threshold of the repository
- Any file in the pull request has code coverage levels below the repository threshold
We do this to ensure the overall reliability of the code base is maintained. This is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
tests/helpers/userAndOrg.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-156: Consider adding event-related test helpers.Given that this PR introduces event attendance tracking functionality, it would be beneficial to add helper functions for creating test events and managing event attendance in the test environment. This would make it easier to write comprehensive tests for the new features.
Consider adding functions like:
createTestEventcreateTestRecurringEventaddUserToEventAttendanceWould you like me to help generate these helper functions to support testing the new event attendance features?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
- config/vitestSetup.ts (0 hunks)
- src/resolvers/Mutation/addEventAttendee.ts (1 hunks)
- src/resolvers/Mutation/updateAgendaCategory.ts (1 hunks)
- src/setup/superAdmin.ts (0 hunks)
- tests/helpers/userAndOrg.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/resolvers/UserTag/childTags.spec.ts (0 hunks)
- tests/resolvers/UserTag/usersAssignedTo.spec.ts (0 hunks)
- tests/resolvers/middleware/currentUserExists.spec.ts (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (5)
- config/vitestSetup.ts
- src/setup/superAdmin.ts
- tests/resolvers/UserTag/childTags.spec.ts
- tests/resolvers/UserTag/usersAssignedTo.spec.ts
- tests/resolvers/middleware/currentUserExists.spec.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/resolvers/Mutation/updateAgendaCategory.ts
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/resolvers/Mutation/addEventAttendee.ts
🔇 Additional comments (1)
tests/helpers/userAndOrg.ts (1)
12-13: LGTM! Type declaration change looks good.The union type syntax modification is valid and maintains the same type semantics.
|
@duplixx Please increase the patch code coverage |
palisadoes
added
the
ignore-sensitive-files-pr
|
@duplixx Please remember to get the code coverage tests to pass |
|
@palisadoes yes i am working on it, handling some errors rn |
|
@palisadoes @DMills27 can you review it now😅 |
|
Please make sure that code rabbit approves the PR |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
schema.graphql (2)
1522-1522: Consider adding pagination support.While the query is well-defined, consider adding pagination parameters (e.g.,
first,skipor cursor-based pagination) to handle large result sets efficiently, similar to other queries in the schema likeeventsByOrganizationConnection.- eventsAttendedByUser(id: ID, orderBy: EventOrderByInput): [Event] + eventsAttendedByUser( + id: ID, + orderBy: EventOrderByInput, + first: Int, + skip: Int + ): EventsConnection!
1545-1545: Consider renaming for consistency with other queries.While the query is functionally correct, consider renaming it to maintain consistency with other query names in the schema that don't use verb prefixes:
- getRecurringEvents(baseRecurringEventId: ID!): [Event] + recurringEvents(baseRecurringEventId: ID!): [Event]
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
schema.graphql(3 hunks)src/resolvers/Query/index.ts(3 hunks)src/typeDefs/queries.ts(2 hunks)src/typeDefs/types.ts(1 hunks)src/types/generatedGraphQLTypes.ts(8 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- src/resolvers/Query/index.ts
- src/typeDefs/queries.ts
- src/typeDefs/types.ts
🔇 Additional comments (6)
schema.graphql (2)
1854-1854: LGTM! Field type and naming are well-defined.
The eventsAttended field is correctly defined as an array of Event objects, following GraphQL naming conventions and type system best practices.
1521-1521: LGTM! Query signature is well-defined.
The eventVolunteersByEvent query is correctly defined with a required event ID parameter and returns an array of EventVolunteer objects.
src/types/generatedGraphQLTypes.ts (4)
2288-2289: LGTM! Query field for event volunteers looks good
The eventVolunteersByEvent query field is properly typed with nullable array of EventVolunteer and requires an event ID parameter.
2961-2961: LGTM! User type field for attended events
The eventsAttended field on the User type is properly typed as a nullable array of Event objects, which aligns with the PR objective of tracking events attended by users.
2546-2548: LGTM! Query field for recurring events
The getRecurringEvents query field is properly typed and requires a baseRecurringEventId parameter to fetch related recurring events, which aligns with the PR objective of supporting recurring event queries.
2427-2430: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider making userId required for eventsAttendedByUser query
The eventsAttendedByUser query field has an optional id parameter, but for security and data access control, it would be better to make this required to ensure we always know which user's events we're querying.
Apply this diff to make the id parameter required:
export type QueryEventsAttendedByUserArgs = {
- id?: InputMaybe<Scalars['ID']['input']>;
+ id: Scalars['ID']['input'];
orderBy?: InputMaybe<EventOrderByInput>;
};Likely invalid or redundant comment.
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
I have added the support for events attended by the member of the organisation and also made the query to fetch all the recurring events throught its base recurring event id
Issue Number:
Fixes #2550
Did you add tests for your changes?
Yes
Snapshots/Videos:
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Summary
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Have you read the contributing guide?
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
addEventAttendeemutation to ensure proper user updates and error messages.Tests
Documentation