Migrated src/components/ContriStats/ContriStats.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest. #2855

mandeepnh5 · 2024-12-25T08:46:14Z

What kind of change does this PR introduce?
This PR will migrate the src/components/ContriStats/ContriStats.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest.

Issue Number:
Fixes #2834

Did you add tests for your changes?
Yes

Snapshots/Videos:

If relevant, did you update the documentation?
No

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No

Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

Tests
- Added vitest testing functions to the ContriStats component test suite.
- Existing test structure remains focused on rendering and verifying component output.

coderabbitai · 2024-12-25T08:46:27Z

Walkthrough

This pull request focuses on migrating the test suite for the ContriStats component from Jest to Vitest by adding Vitest-specific import statements. The change involves importing describe, test, and expect from the vitest testing framework, enabling the use of Vitest's testing functions while maintaining the existing test structure and logic.

Changes

File	Change Summary
`src/components/ContriStats/ContriStats.spec.tsx`	Added Vitest import: `import { describe, test, expect } from 'vitest';`

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Replace Jest-specific functions with Vitest equivalents [#2834]	✅
Rename test file to `.spec.*` suffix [#2834]	✅
Ensure tests pass using `npm run test:vitest` [#2834]	❓	Requires full test run verification
Maintain 100% test coverage [#2834]	❓	Requires coverage report verification

Possibly related issues

Refactor : src/components/CheckIn/CheckInWrapper.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest #2495: Similar Vitest migration for CheckInWrapper.test.tsx
Refactor: src/components/AddOn/support/components/MainContent/MainContent.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest #2475: Vitest migration for MainContent.test.tsx
Refactor: src/screens/OrgContribution from Jest to Vitest #2564: Vitest migration for OrgContribution tests

Possibly related PRs

Refactored src/components/AddOn/support/components/Action/Action.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest #2482: Refactoring tests from Jest to Vitest
Refactor: Added Vitest To Requests Screen #2655: Integrating Vitest into Requests screen tests
convert from jest to vitest #2486 #2705: Transitioning Advertisements.spec.tsx to Vitest

Suggested labels

refactor

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's Ode to Vitest Migration 🧪

From Jest to Vitest, our tests take flight,
Importing functions with coding delight,
Describe, test, expect - our new testing crew,
Hopping through code with a methodology true!

Refactoring magic, one import at a time! 🚀

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1bc2d3b and d032644.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

src/components/ContriStats/ContriStats.spec.tsx (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

src/components/ContriStats/ContriStats.spec.tsx (1)

9-9: 💡 Codebase verification

Lingering Jest dependencies need to be cleaned up

The codebase still contains multiple Jest-related dependencies and configurations that should be removed as part of the migration to Vitest:

Package.json contains Jest dependencies and scripts:
- @testing-library/jest-dom
- @types/jest
- babel-jest
- eslint-plugin-jest
- jest
- jest-localstorage-mock
- jest-location-mock
- jest-preview
- Test script still uses Jest: "test": "cross-env NODE_ENV=test jest --env=./scripts/custom-test-env.js --watchAll --coverage"
Configuration files:
- jest.config.js file exists with Jest-specific configuration
- scripts/custom-test-env.js uses Jest environment
Test setup files:
- src/setupTests.ts contains Jest-specific setup code and imports
- vitest.setup.ts imports Jest DOM matchers

🔗 Analysis chain

Migration to Vitest confirmed.
The new import statement correctly integrates Vitest's testing functions. Consider verifying that there are no lingering Jest-specific references or global mocks in your codebase to ensure a clean transition.

You can run the following script to look for any references to “jest” in the repository:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search the entire repo for references to "jest"
rg 'jest' -A 5

Length of output: 71600

⛔ Skipped due to learnings

Learnt from: bitbard3
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2588
File: src/components/ChangeLanguageDropdown/ChangeLanguageDropdown.spec.tsx:145-155
Timestamp: 2024-12-02T04:20:11.745Z
Learning: In PRs focused solely on refactoring test cases from Jest to Vitest, avoid suggesting optimizations or changes outside the migration scope.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
- Generate unit testing code for this file.
- Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

@coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
@coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
@coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
@coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
@coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
@coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
@coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
@coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
@coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

github-actions · 2024-12-25T08:46:35Z

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

comments in this PR or
our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

codecov · 2024-12-25T09:02:08Z

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 87.80%. Comparing base (1bc2d3b) to head (d032644).
Report is 3 commits behind head on develop-postgres.

Additional details and impacted files

@@                  Coverage Diff                  @@
##           develop-postgres    #2855       +/-   ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage             65.12%   87.80%   +22.67%     
=====================================================
  Files                   296      313       +17     
  Lines                  7369     8222      +853     
  Branches               1609     1854      +245     
=====================================================
+ Hits                   4799     7219     +2420     
+ Misses                 2336      804     -1532     
+ Partials                234      199       -35

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

mandeepnh5 · 2024-12-25T09:04:18Z

@coderabbitai review

coderabbitai · 2024-12-25T09:04:23Z

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

palisadoes · 2024-12-25T09:11:43Z

@mandeepnh5 Use this instead

@coderabbitai full review

coderabbitai · 2024-12-25T09:12:16Z

@palisadoes: Understood. I’ll redo a complete review of all changes.

✅ Actions performed

Full review triggered.

Update contistats jest to vitest

c1c4b01

mandeepnh5 added 2 commits December 25, 2024 08:48

Fix linting issue

86437c3

Fix package json issue

d032644

coderabbitai bot approved these changes Dec 25, 2024

View reviewed changes

palisadoes approved these changes Dec 25, 2024

View reviewed changes

palisadoes merged commit 1eab2c1 into PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres Dec 25, 2024
13 checks passed

coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Dec 26, 2024

Refactored src/components/OrgContriCards/OrgContriCards.test.tsx fixes #2810 #2939

Merged

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Migrated src/components/ContriStats/ContriStats.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest. #2855

Migrated src/components/ContriStats/ContriStats.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest. #2855

mandeepnh5 commented Dec 25, 2024 •

edited by coderabbitai bot

Loading

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 25, 2024 •

edited

Loading

Chat

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

Other keywords and placeholders

Documentation and Community

github-actions bot commented Dec 25, 2024

codecov bot commented Dec 25, 2024 •

edited

Loading

mandeepnh5 commented Dec 25, 2024

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 25, 2024

palisadoes commented Dec 25, 2024 •

edited

Loading

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 25, 2024

Migrated src/components/ContriStats/ContriStats.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest. #2855

Migrated src/components/ContriStats/ContriStats.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest. #2855

Conversation

mandeepnh5 commented Dec 25, 2024 • edited by coderabbitai bot Loading

Summary by CodeRabbit

Summary by CodeRabbit

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 25, 2024 • edited Loading

Walkthrough

Changes

Assessment against linked issues

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

Poem

Chat

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

Other keywords and placeholders

Documentation and Community

github-actions bot commented Dec 25, 2024

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Testing Your Code

Reviewers

Reviewing Your Code

CONTRIBUTING.md

Other

codecov bot commented Dec 25, 2024 • edited Loading

Codecov Report

mandeepnh5 commented Dec 25, 2024

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 25, 2024

palisadoes commented Dec 25, 2024 • edited Loading

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 25, 2024

mandeepnh5 commented Dec 25, 2024 •

edited by coderabbitai bot

Loading

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 25, 2024 •

edited

Loading

codecov bot commented Dec 25, 2024 •

edited

Loading

palisadoes commented Dec 25, 2024 •

edited

Loading