Refactored src/components/OrgContriCards/OrgContriCards.test.tsx fixes #2810

[Ramneet04]

Refactored src/components/OrgContriCards/OrgContriCards.test.tsx to
src/components/OrgContriCards/OrgContriCards.spec.tsx

Issue: #2810: #2810

Changes Implemented:

Refactored the testing framework from Jest to Vitest in src/components/OrgContriCards/OrgContriCards.test.tsx.
Updated import statements, mocking methods, and assertions to align with Vitest conventions.
Verified compatibility with the existing codebase using Vitest.

• Renamed the test file:
  OrgContriCards.test.tsx → OrgContriCards.spec.tsx to follow the naming convention for Vitest.
• Ran all tests successfully under the Vitest environment.
  Refactor src/components/OrgContriCards/OrgContriCards.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest #2810

Other information
I have read the previous refactor PR and tried to keep things as uniform as possible.
Please suggest any other changes if required.###

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Tests
  • Enhanced test suite for the OrgContriCards component with improved structuring for test cases and assertions.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces an import statement for describe and expect from the Vitest testing framework in the OrgContriCards.spec.tsx file. This change is part of a broader effort to migrate test suites from Jest to Vitest across the project, enabling more modern and feature-rich testing capabilities while maintaining the existing test structure and functionality.

Changes

File	Change Summary
src/components/OrgContriCards/OrgContriCards.spec.tsx	Added import for describe and expect from 'vitest'

Possibly related issues

• Refactor: src/screens/OrgContribution from Jest to Vitest #2564: Refactor src/screens/OrgContribution from Jest to Vitest - This PR aligns with the broader initiative to migrate test suites to Vitest.
• Refactor: src/components/AddOn/support/components/MainContent/MainContent.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest #2475: Refactor MainContent.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest - Part of the project-wide testing framework migration.
• Refactor : src/components/CheckIn/CheckInWrapper.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest #2495: Refactor CheckInWrapper.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest - Consistent with the current PR's approach.

Possibly related PRs

• Refactor : src/setup/checkConnection/checkConnection from Jest to Vitest #2751 #2767: Transition from Jest to Vitest in checkConnection.spec.ts
• refactor: jest to vitest of OrganizationActionItems : fixes #2557 #2773: Refactoring tests for OrganizationActionItems component to use Vitest
• Migrated src/components/InfiniteScrollLoader/InfiniteScrollLoader.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest #2854: Introducing Vitest imports in InfiniteScrollLoader.spec.tsx
• Migrated src/components/ContriStats/ContriStats.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest. #2855: Adding Vitest imports in ContriStats.spec.tsx

Suggested reviewers

• palisadoes

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's Ode to Vitest's Might

In tests where Jest once held its sway,
Vitest hops in to brighten the day!
Imports dance with graceful flair,
Describing tests without a care.
Code leaps forward, testing bright! 🧪✨

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 89aebba and 722e342.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• src/components/OrgContriCards/OrgContriCards.spec.tsx (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

src/components/OrgContriCards/OrgContriCards.spec.tsx (1)

10-10: Looks good!

The usage of Vitest’s describe and expect here is consistent and aligns with best practices for migrating from Jest to Vitest.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[github-actions]

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
   1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
   1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
   2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
   3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

1. comments in this PR or
2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.36%. Comparing base (5c7fcd7) to head (722e342).
Report is 27 commits behind head on develop-postgres.

Additional details and impacted files

@@                  Coverage Diff                  @@
##           develop-postgres    #2939       +/-   ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage             60.19%   88.36%   +28.17%     
=====================================================
  Files                   296      316       +20     
  Lines                  7373     8271      +898     
  Branches               1610     1868      +258     
=====================================================
+ Hits                   4438     7309     +2871     
+ Misses                 2690      747     -1943     
+ Partials                245      215       -30     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.