Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CHORES] Refactor CSS for Org Post #2774

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 24, 2024

Conversation

hustlernik
Copy link

@hustlernik hustlernik commented Dec 24, 2024

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Streamlined all CSS for OrgPost into a single global file, fixed UI bugs on the OrgPost page, and ensured no conflicts with other pages.

Issue Number:

Fixes #2522

Did you add tests for your changes?

No

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

No

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced new styles for the organization post feature, enhancing layout and responsiveness.
    • Added classes for buttons and input fields specific to the organization post context.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Removed outdated styles that could affect the layout and appearance of the organization post screen.
  • Refactor

    • Updated class names in the OrgPost component for better organization and clarity.
  • Style

    • Implemented new styles for media previews, buttons, and loading animations to improve user experience.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 24, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@hustlernik has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 13 minutes and 56 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a15d8c0 and 39a9466.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/style/app.module.css (2 hunks)

Walkthrough

This pull request focuses on refactoring the CSS for the Organization Post screen by removing the OrgPost.module.css file and consolidating its styles into the global app.module.css file. The changes involve updating class names in the OrgPost.tsx component to use more specific suffixes like "OrgPost" and moving all related styles to the global CSS file. This approach aims to streamline the application's styling and improve maintainability.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/screens/OrgPost/OrgPost.module.css Entire CSS file removed
src/screens/OrgPost/OrgPost.tsx Updated class names with "OrgPost" suffix for various elements
src/style/app.module.css Added new classes for OrgPost styling, including button, container, and preview styles

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Merge CSS files into global file
Delete CSS files in subdirectory
Reference global CSS file
Improve UI/UX for color-blind users Requires further color contrast verification

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • palisadoes

Poem

🐰 In the realm of CSS so bright,
Styles dance with newfound might,
OrgPost's module takes its bow,
Global styles now take the vow,
Refactoring with rabbit delight! 🎨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
src/style/app.module.css (5)

1598-1626: Consider using CSS custom properties for repeated values.

The container styles are well-structured, but we can improve maintainability by extracting common values into CSS custom properties.

+:root {
+  --orgpost-margin: 2.5rem 0;
+  --orgpost-button-width: 52px;
+  --orgpost-outline-color: var(--bs-gray-400);
+}

 .btnsContainerOrgPost {
   display: flex;
-  margin: 2.5rem 0 2.5rem 0;
+  margin: var(--orgpost-margin);
 }

 .btnsContainerOrgPost input {
-  outline: 1px solid var(--bs-gray-400);
+  outline: 1px solid var(--orgpost-outline-color);
 }

 .btnsContainerOrgPost .inputOrgPost button {
-  width: 52px;
+  width: var(--orgpost-button-width);
 }

1627-1648: Enhance preview component responsiveness.

The preview component uses a fixed width which might not work well on smaller screens. Consider making it more responsive.

 .previewOrgPost img,
 .previewOrgPost video {
-  width: 400px;
+  width: 100%;
+  max-width: 400px;
   height: auto;
 }

1702-1716: Improve button styles maintainability.

The button styles use hardcoded values and could be simplified.

+:root {
+  --orgpost-btn-border-color: #e8e5e5;
+  --orgpost-btn-shadow: 0 2px 2px var(--orgpost-btn-border-color);
+  --orgpost-btn-transition: 0.2s ease;
+}

 .addbtnOrgPost {
-  border: 1px solid #e8e5e5;
-  box-shadow: 0 2px 2px #e8e5e5;
+  border: 1px solid var(--orgpost-btn-border-color);
+  box-shadow: var(--orgpost-btn-shadow);
   border-radius: 5px;
   font-size: 16px;
   height: 60%;
   width: 60%;
   color: white;
   outline: none;
   font-weight: 600;
   cursor: pointer;
-  transition:
-    transform 0.2s,
-    box-shadow 0.2s;
+  transition: all var(--orgpost-btn-transition);
 }

1741-1782: Optimize loader animation.

The loader animation has duplicate keyframe definitions and unnecessary vendor prefixes for modern browsers.

 .loader {
   margin: 60px auto;
   margin-top: 35vh !important;
   font-size: 10px;
   position: relative;
   text-indent: -9999em;
   border-top: 1.1em solid rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.2);
   border-right: 1.1em solid rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.2);
   border-bottom: 1.1em solid rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.2);
   border-left: 1.1em solid #febc59;
-  -webkit-transform: translateZ(0);
-  -ms-transform: translateZ(0);
   transform: translateZ(0);
-  -webkit-animation: load8 1.1s infinite linear;
   animation: load8 1.1s infinite linear;
 }

-@-webkit-keyframes load8 {
-  0% {
-    -webkit-transform: rotate(0deg);
-    transform: rotate(0deg);
-  }
-  100% {
-    -webkit-transform: rotate(360deg);
-    transform: rotate(360deg);
-  }
-}

 @keyframes load8 {
   0% {
-    -webkit-transform: rotate(0deg);
     transform: rotate(0deg);
   }
   100% {
-    -webkit-transform: rotate(360deg);
     transform: rotate(360deg);
   }
 }

1783-1793: Consider using CSS clamp for flexible sizing.

The list box uses a fixed viewport height which might not be ideal for all screen sizes.

 .list_box {
-  height: 70vh;
+  height: clamp(300px, 70vh, 800px);
   overflow-y: auto;
   width: auto;
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c14708f and 70292f7.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/screens/OrgPost/OrgPost.module.css (0 hunks)
  • src/screens/OrgPost/OrgPost.tsx (6 hunks)
  • src/style/app.module.css (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • src/screens/OrgPost/OrgPost.module.css
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • src/screens/OrgPost/OrgPost.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/style/app.module.css (1)

1650-1701: Well-structured responsive design implementation.

The media queries follow best practices with appropriate breakpoints and mobile-first approach.

src/style/app.module.css Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
src/style/app.module.css (5)

1598-1626: Consider using CSS custom properties for consistent values.

The button and container styles are well-structured, but could be improved by:

  1. Extracting repeated values like margins and outlines into CSS custom properties
  2. Using more semantic class names for better maintainability
+:root {
+  --orgpost-container-margin: 2.5rem 0;
+  --orgpost-outline-color: var(--bs-gray-400);
+  --orgpost-button-width: 52px;
+}

 .btnsContainerOrgPost {
   display: flex;
-  margin: 2.5rem 0 2.5rem 0;
+  margin: var(--orgpost-container-margin);
 }

 .btnsContainerOrgPost input {
-  outline: 1px solid var(--bs-gray-400);
+  outline: 1px solid var(--orgpost-outline-color);
 }

 .btnsContainerOrgPost .inputOrgPost button {
-  width: 52px;
+  width: var(--orgpost-button-width);
 }

1627-1641: Enhance responsive behavior for media preview.

The media preview styles could be more responsive:

  1. Consider using max-width instead of fixed width
  2. Add aspect-ratio property for better media scaling
 .previewOrgPost img {
-  width: 400px;
+  max-width: 400px;
+  width: 100%;
   height: auto;
+  aspect-ratio: auto;
 }

 .previewOrgPost video {
-  width: 400px;
+  max-width: 400px;
+  width: 100%;
   height: auto;
+  aspect-ratio: 16/9;
 }

1642-1701: Optimize media queries and margin consistency.

The responsive styles are well-implemented but could be optimized:

  1. Consider consolidating media queries for similar breakpoints
  2. Use consistent margin declarations
 @media (max-width: 1020px) {
   .btnsContainerOrgPost {
     flex-direction: column;
-    margin: 1.5rem 0;
+    margin: var(--orgpost-container-margin);
   }
 }

-@media (max-width: 520px) {
+@media (max-width: 575.5px) {
   .btnsContainerOrgPost {
     margin-bottom: 0;
   }
+  .mainpagerightOrgPost {
+    width: 98%;
+  }
 }

-@media screen and (max-width: 575.5px) {
-  .mainpagerightOrgPost {
-    width: 98%;
-  }
-}

1702-1736: Optimize button styles and transitions.

The button styles are well-structured but could be improved:

  1. Extract common button properties to custom properties
  2. Make transitions more specific to improve performance
+:root {
+  --orgpost-button-shadow: 0 2px 2px #e8e5e5;
+  --orgpost-button-transition: 0.2s ease;
+}

 .addbtnOrgPost {
   border: 1px solid #e8e5e5;
-  box-shadow: 0 2px 2px #e8e5e5;
+  box-shadow: var(--orgpost-button-shadow);
   transition:
-    transform 0.2s,
-    box-shadow 0.2s;
+    transform var(--orgpost-button-transition),
+    box-shadow var(--orgpost-button-transition);
 }

1778-1788: Enhance list box styles with custom properties.

The list box styles could be improved:

  1. Use custom properties for viewport-based values
  2. Consider consolidating with other mobile media queries
+:root {
+  --list-box-height: 70vh;
+  --form-wrapper-mobile-width: 90%;
+}

 .list_box {
-  height: 70vh;
+  height: var(--list-box-height);
   overflow-y: auto;
   width: auto;
 }

 @media only screen and (max-width: 600px) {
   .form_wrapper {
-    width: 90%;
+    width: var(--form-wrapper-mobile-width);
     top: 45%;
   }
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 70292f7 and a15d8c0.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/style/app.module.css (1 hunks)

src/style/app.module.css Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 24, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 87.17%. Comparing base (c14708f) to head (39a9466).
Report is 2 commits behind head on develop-postgres.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                  Coverage Diff                  @@
##           develop-postgres    #2774       +/-   ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage             71.94%   87.17%   +15.22%     
=====================================================
  Files                   296      313       +17     
  Lines                  7358     8204      +846     
  Branches               1606     1792      +186     
=====================================================
+ Hits                   5294     7152     +1858     
+ Misses                 1804      867      -937     
+ Partials                260      185       -75     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants