Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[REFACTOR] CSS for AddOnEntry.tsx #2933

Conversation

hustlernik
Copy link
Contributor

@hustlernik hustlernik commented Dec 26, 2024

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Streamlined all CSS for AddOnEntry.tsx into a single global file, fixed UI bugs on the AddOnEntry.tsx , and ensured no conflicts with other pages.

Issue Number:

Fixes #2884

Did you add tests for your changes?

No

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

No

Have you read the contributing guide?

Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced new styling for the AddOnEntry component, enhancing its visual presentation.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Streamlined the AddOnEntry component by removing unused properties to improve performance.
  • Chores

    • Updated the styling import path for the AddOnEntry component to reflect changes in the CSS structure.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 26, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request focuses on refactoring the CSS for the AddOnEntry component by moving styles from a module-specific CSS file (AddOnEntry.module.css) to the global app.module.css file. The changes involve removing the module-specific CSS file, updating the import statement in the AddOnEntry.tsx component, and transferring the existing styles to the global CSS file. This is part of a broader effort to streamline CSS management and improve the application's UI/UX.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/components/AddOn/core/AddOnEntry/AddOnEntry.module.css Deleted entire CSS file
src/components/AddOn/core/AddOnEntry/AddOnEntry.tsx Updated style import from relative path to app.module.css; commented out unused props
src/style/app.module.css Added new CSS classes: .entrytoggle, .entryaction, .cardAddOnEntry, .entryaction i, .entryaction .spinner-grow

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Refactor CSS in AddOnEntry.tsx [#2884]
Move CSS to app.module.css [#2884]
Remove embedded CSS references [#2884]

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • palisadoes

Poem

🐰 CSS dancing, files combine,
Styles migrate in a neat design,
From module to global, a clean refrain,
Rabbit hops through code's domain,
Simplicity blooms, complexity wanes! 🎨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/style/app.module.css (2)

2308-2311: Consider fallback for fit-content.
Some older browsers do not fully support width: fit-content;. If legacy browser support is a concern, investigate graceful fallbacks or evaluate whether auto could serve the same purpose.


2313-2319: Use caution with !important.
Overuse of !important can make overrides tricky. Check if adding a higher specificity or restructuring the CSS could allow you to remove the !important keyword for better maintainability.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9772f7d and bb21d97.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/components/AddOn/core/AddOnEntry/AddOnEntry.module.css (0 hunks)
  • src/components/AddOn/core/AddOnEntry/AddOnEntry.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/style/app.module.css (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • src/components/AddOn/core/AddOnEntry/AddOnEntry.module.css
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/components/AddOn/core/AddOnEntry/AddOnEntry.tsx (1)

2-2: Confirm scoping and naming collisions for global style imports.
Switching from a component-scoped CSS module to a global stylesheet might risk style collisions if similar class names are used elsewhere. Make sure that the .entrytoggle, .entryaction, etc., class names are unique enough to avoid unexpected overrides.

src/style/app.module.css (3)

2320-2322: Verify border color consistency with the design system.
A 4px green border may be too strong or inconsistent with your brand palette. Confirm if you have a predefined brand variable for “green” or if a thinner border might be less obtrusive.


2323-2325: Spacing around icons looks good.
Adding an 8px margin is a clean way to separate the icon from the text. This is a simple and effective styling choice.


2327-2331: Confirm spinner size in multiple contexts.
Reducing .spinner-grow to 1rem by 1rem is helpful for compact layouts but ensure it remains visible and accessible on smaller screens or high-DPI displays.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 26, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.13%. Comparing base (9772f7d) to head (bb21d97).
Report is 2 commits behind head on develop-postgres.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                  Coverage Diff                  @@
##           develop-postgres    #2933       +/-   ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage             47.49%   88.13%   +40.63%     
=====================================================
  Files                   299      316       +17     
  Lines                  7414     8265      +851     
  Branches               1621     1866      +245     
=====================================================
+ Hits                   3521     7284     +3763     
+ Misses                 3653      770     -2883     
+ Partials                240      211       -29     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@palisadoes palisadoes merged commit c1d2e5f into PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres Dec 26, 2024
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants