changed color schema for the tag and action item screen #2417
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request primarily involve modifications to various components and styles within the organization action items and tags sections of the application. Key updates include adjustments to import paths for CSS modules, changes in class names for buttons, and enhancements to styling and layout across several components. Additionally, new CSS variables and classes have been introduced to improve the overall design and responsiveness of the application. The functionality of the components remains largely intact, with some refinements to user interface elements and state management. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessWe have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team. Testing Your CodePlease make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if these conditions occur:
The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #2417 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 98.28% 98.26% -0.03%
===========================================
Files 283 297 +14
Lines 8224 8638 +414
Branches 2356 2514 +158
===========================================
+ Hits 8083 8488 +405
- Misses 132 139 +7
- Partials 9 11 +2 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (13)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemUpdateStatusModal.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-138: Consider adding ARIA labels for better accessibility.While the PR focuses on color accessibility, consider enhancing overall accessibility by adding ARIA labels to the modal and its interactive elements.
Apply these changes to improve accessibility:
- <Modal className={styles.itemModal} show={isOpen} onHide={hide}> + <Modal className={styles.itemModal} show={isOpen} onHide={hide} aria-label={t('actionItemStatus')}> <Modal.Header> <p className={styles.titlemodal}>{t('actionItemStatus')}</p> <Button variant="danger" onClick={hide} className={styles.closeButton} data-testid="modalCloseBtn" + aria-label={tCommon('close')} >src/style/app.module.css (1)
Line range hint
4-24: Consider enhancing color contrast for better accessibilityWhile the new color variables provide consistency, consider the following accessibility improvements:
- Add WCAG color contrast ratios as comments
- Consider using CSS custom properties for different color blindness modes (protanopia, deuteranopia, tritanopia)
- Ensure sufficient contrast between background colors (--table-bg-color: #eaebef and --tablerow-bg-color: #eff1f7)
Example enhancement:
:root { /* Base colors with contrast ratios */ --dropdown-hover-color: #eff1f7; /* contrast-ratio: X:1 */ --grey-bg-color: #eaebef; /* contrast-ratio: X:1 */ /* Color blindness variations */ --dropdown-hover-color-deuteranopia: #...; --grey-bg-color-deuteranopia: #...; } /* Usage with @media queries for color blindness modes */ @media (prefers-contrast: more) { :root { /* Higher contrast variations */ } }src/screens/OrganizationPeople/OrganizationPeople.tsx (2)
Line range hint
299-303: Enhance search button accessibility for color-blind usersWhile the button styling has been simplified, consider these accessibility improvements:
- Ensure sufficient color contrast for the search button and icon
- Add
:focus-visiblestyles for keyboard navigation- Add
aria-labelto improve screen reader experience<Button type="submit" - className={`${styles.searchButton} `} + className={`${styles.searchButton}`} + aria-label={t('searchFullName')} data-testid={'searchbtn'} > <Search className={styles.searchIcon} /> </Button>
Line range hint
1-516: Consider implementing a comprehensive color system for accessibilityWhile the changes move in the right direction for color-blind accessibility, consider implementing a systematic approach:
- Create a dedicated color theme system with WCAG-compliant color pairs
- Use CSS custom properties for consistent color management
- Add color contrast testing to your CI pipeline
- Consider implementing a high-contrast mode toggle
Consider creating a shared color tokens file:
// src/theme/colors.ts export const colors = { primary: { default: '#0066CC', hover: '#0052A3', focus: '#004C99', }, background: { main: '#FFFFFF', alternate: '#F5F6F8', hover: '#EAEBEF', }, // Add more semantic color tokens } as const;src/screens/SubTags/SubTags.tsx (4)
303-333: Remove commented out style classesThe dropdown implementation is good from an accessibility perspective as it includes both icon and text. However, there are commented-out style classes that should be removed:
- // className={styles.dropdown} - // className="ms-4 mb-4" - // className="color-red"
Line range hint
357-384: Enhance breadcrumb navigation accessibilityThe breadcrumb implementation provides good visual hierarchy with carets. Consider these improvements:
- Add aria-current="page" to the current tag element
- Verify that text-secondary color provides sufficient contrast for color-blind users
- Consider adding a nav element with aria-label="breadcrumb" for better screen reader support
17-17: Verify complete color scheme in app.module.cssSince this PR aims to improve accessibility for color-blind users, please ensure:
- All colors defined in app.module.css meet WCAG AA standards
- Consider using tools like WebAIM's color contrast checker to verify the entire color palette
- Test with color blindness simulation tools to verify the effectiveness of the changes
Would you like assistance in setting up automated accessibility testing tools for the project?
Modal buttons need color contrast improvements
The color contrast analysis reveals potential accessibility issues:
The closeButton uses:
- Background:
var(--delete-button-bg)(#f8d6dc)- Text color:
var(--delete-button-color)(#ff4d4f)- This combination likely fails WCAG contrast requirements
The addButton uses:
- Background:
var(--search-button-bg)(#a8c7fa)- Text color: #555555
- Hover state changes to #286fe0 which may have better contrast
The tableHeader uses:
- Background:
var(--bs-primary)- Text color:
var(--bs-white)- While this is likely compliant, it depends on the Bootstrap primary color value
Recommendations:
- Increase the contrast ratio for the closeButton by using darker text on the light pink background
- Darken the text color on the addButton to meet WCAG AA standards (4.5:1 for normal text)
- Add the suggested
role="dialog"andaria-labelledbyattributes🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
446-484: Verify modal button contrast ratiosThe modal implementation has good semantic structure. Please ensure:
- The tableHeader, closeButton, and addButton styles meet WCAG color contrast requirements
- Consider adding role="dialog" and aria-labelledby pointing to the modal title for better screen reader support
Let me fix the regex syntax and also expand the search to include different CSS file extensions and CSS module files that might be specific to the SubTags component.
I see multiple occurrences of these classes. Let's examine their actual style definitions to verify the color contrast concerns.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for button style definitions rg "(closeButton|addButton|tableHeader).*{" --type cssLength of output: 196
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for button style definitions with fixed regex rg "(closeButton|addButton|tableHeader).*\{" --type css # Also check scss/sass files rg "(closeButton|addButton|tableHeader).*\{" --type scss # Check for CSS module files near the component fd "SubTags.module" --extension css --extension scssLength of output: 2013
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the actual CSS definitions in the relevant files cat src/style/app.module.css src/screens/SubTags/SubTags.module.cssLength of output: 11612
src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.tsx (2)
453-458: Review modal header styling approachUsing
styles.tableHeaderfor modal header styling might not be semantically correct. Consider creating a dedicated modal header class that ensures proper color contrast while maintaining semantic meaning.
Line range hint
1-498: Recommend comprehensive accessibility testingGiven the extensive color scheme changes, recommend:
- Running automated accessibility tools (e.g., axe, WAVE) to verify WCAG compliance
- Testing with color blindness simulation tools
- Conducting keyboard navigation testing
- Adding automated accessibility tests to prevent future regressions
Would you like help setting up automated accessibility tests for this component?
src/screens/OrganizationPeople/AddMember.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-607: Consider additional accessibility improvementsWhile the color scheme changes are a good start for improving accessibility, consider these additional enhancements:
- Add
aria-labelattributes to icon-only buttons- Ensure all interactive elements are keyboard accessible
- Consider adding a high-contrast theme option
- Document color combinations that have been tested for color blindness
Consider implementing these accessibility features:
// Example improvements for buttons <Button aria-label="Add member" className={styles.addButton} data-testid="addBtn" > <i className="fa fa-plus me-2" aria-hidden="true" /> Add </Button>src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.tsx (2)
382-382: Good practice: Semantic class names improve accessibility.The change from color-based class names (
modalCloseBtn,greenregbtn) to semantic names (closeButton,addButton) is a good accessibility practice. This decouples the visual appearance from the function, making it easier to maintain and modify color schemes for accessibility without changing component logic.Consider applying this semantic naming pattern consistently across other components in the application for better maintainability and accessibility.
Also applies to: 637-637
Line range hint
446-485: Consider enhancing toggle button accessibility.While the toggle button group implementation is good, we could enhance its accessibility:
- The toggle buttons use icons with text, which is good for visual recognition
- Consider adding
aria-pressedattributes to improve screen reader feedbackHere's how to enhance the toggle buttons:
<label className={`btn btn-outline-primary ${styles.toggleBtn}`} htmlFor="individualRadio" + aria-pressed={assigneeType === 'EventVolunteer'} > <HiUser className="me-1" /> {t('individuals')} </label> <label className={`btn btn-outline-primary ${styles.toggleBtn}`} htmlFor="groupsRadio" + aria-pressed={assigneeType === 'EventVolunteerGroup'} > <HiUserGroup className="me-1" /> {t('groups')} </label>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.tsx(3 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemUpdateStatusModal.tsx(3 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/OrganizationActionItems.module.css(1 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/OrganizationActionItems.tsx(8 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationPeople/AddMember.tsx(1 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationPeople/OrganizationPeople.tsx(1 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.module.css(0 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.tsx(8 hunks)src/screens/SubTags/SubTags.tsx(7 hunks)src/style/app.module.css(7 hunks)src/utils/organizationTagsUtils.ts(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.module.css
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/OrganizationActionItems.module.css
- src/utils/organizationTagsUtils.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (2)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.tsx (2)
Learnt from: Chaitanya1672
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2049
File: src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ActionItemUpdateModal.tsx:112-138
Timestamp: 2024-07-03T07:40:16.065Z
Learning: The `istanbul ignore next` comments in the `ActionItemUpdateModal.tsx` file were added as part of a commit that introduced tests for the `ActionItemUpdateModal` component. Removing these comments and writing tests to cover the previously ignored lines is recommended to ensure code integrity and improve test coverage.
Learnt from: Chaitanya1672
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2049
File: src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ActionItemUpdateModal.tsx:112-138
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T16:13:41.996Z
Learning: The `istanbul ignore next` comments in the `ActionItemUpdateModal.tsx` file were added as part of a commit that introduced tests for the `ActionItemUpdateModal` component. Removing these comments and writing tests to cover the previously ignored lines is recommended to ensure code integrity and improve test coverage.
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemUpdateStatusModal.tsx (2)
Learnt from: Chaitanya1672
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2049
File: src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ActionItemUpdateModal.tsx:112-138
Timestamp: 2024-07-03T07:40:16.065Z
Learning: The `istanbul ignore next` comments in the `ActionItemUpdateModal.tsx` file were added as part of a commit that introduced tests for the `ActionItemUpdateModal` component. Removing these comments and writing tests to cover the previously ignored lines is recommended to ensure code integrity and improve test coverage.
Learnt from: Chaitanya1672
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2049
File: src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ActionItemUpdateModal.tsx:112-138
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T16:13:41.996Z
Learning: The `istanbul ignore next` comments in the `ActionItemUpdateModal.tsx` file were added as part of a commit that introduced tests for the `ActionItemUpdateModal` component. Removing these comments and writing tests to cover the previously ignored lines is recommended to ensure code integrity and improve test coverage.
🔇 Additional comments (15)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemUpdateStatusModal.tsx (3)
126-126: Verify color accessibility for action button.
The class name change from greenregbtn to addButton suggests a move away from color-specific naming, which is good practice. However, we should verify that the new style maintains clear visual distinction while being accessible to color-blind users.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the addButton class in app.module.css meets WCAG color contrast guidelines
# Search for the addButton class definition and its color properties
rg "\.addButton\s*{[^}]*}" "src/style/app.module.css"92-92: Verify color contrast for close button.
The class name change from modalCloseBtn to closeButton should ensure proper color contrast for the close icon, especially important for color-blind users.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the closeButton class in app.module.css meets WCAG color contrast guidelines
# Search for the closeButton class definition and its color properties
rg "\.closeButton\s*{[^}]*}" "src/style/app.module.css"5-5: Verify color accessibility in the new style module.
The change from component-specific styles to the global app.module.css aligns with the PR's objective to improve color accessibility. However, we should verify that the new styles implement accessible color combinations.
✅ Verification successful
Color accessibility improvements verified in the new styles
The migration to app.module.css implements a robust color system using CSS custom properties that supports better accessibility:
-
The
closeButton(previouslymodalCloseBtn) now uses high-contrast combinations:- Normal state: Red text (
--delete-button-color: #ff4d4f) on light pink (--delete-button-bg: #f8d6dc) - Hover state: Inverted colors for clear state change
- Normal state: Red text (
-
The
addButton(previouslygreenregbtn) uses:- Normal state: Blue background (
--search-button-bg: #a8c7fa) with defined border - Hover state: Darker blue (
#286fe0) for better contrast
- Normal state: Blue background (
The new color system with CSS variables provides consistent, accessible color combinations throughout the application.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the color definitions in the new style module
# Look for color variables and their usage
# Search for color-related CSS properties in the new style file
rg -A 1 "(?:color|background|border).*#[0-9a-fA-F]" "src/style/app.module.css"
# Search for the specific button classes
rg "\.closeButton|\.addButton" "src/style/app.module.css"
Length of output: 435
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual color definitions for these buttons
rg -A 3 "\.closeButton|\.addButton" "src/style/app.module.css"
# Also check for any color variables or custom properties
rg "(:root|--.*color|#[0-9a-fA-F]{3,6})" "src/style/app.module.css"
# Let's also check the previous style file to compare color changes
fd -e css -e scss ItemUpdateStatusModal src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ --exec rg -A 3 "modalCloseBtn|greenregbtn" {}
Length of output: 2347
src/style/app.module.css (2)
431-485: LGTM: Responsive design implementation
The media queries and responsive layout adjustments are well-structured and maintain accessibility across different screen sizes.
Line range hint 4-24: Verify color contrast ratios meet WCAG guidelines
Let's verify the contrast ratios of the new color combinations.
src/screens/OrganizationPeople/OrganizationPeople.tsx (1)
Line range hint 442-468: Improve DataGrid accessibility for color-blind users
The current DataGrid styling could be enhanced for better accessibility:
- The focus outline color (#000) might not provide sufficient contrast with the background
- The hover state uses subtle box-shadow which might be hard to perceive
- The background colors (#EAEBEF, #eff1f7) should be verified for proper contrast ratios
Consider these improvements:
sx={{
borderRadius: '20px',
backgroundColor: '#EAEBEF',
'& .MuiDataGrid-row': {
backgroundColor: '#eff1f7',
'&:focus-within': {
- outline: '2px solid #000',
+ outline: '3px solid #0066CC', // Higher contrast color
outlineOffset: '-2px',
},
},
'& .MuiDataGrid-row:hover': {
backgroundColor: '#EAEBEF',
- boxShadow: '0 0 0 1px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1)',
+ boxShadow: '0 0 0 2px #0066CC', // More visible hover state
},
'& .MuiDataGrid-row.Mui-hovered': {
backgroundColor: '#EAEBEF',
- boxShadow: '0 0 0 1px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1)',
+ boxShadow: '0 0 0 2px #0066CC',
},
'& .MuiDataGrid-cell:focus': {
- outline: '2px solid #000',
+ outline: '3px solid #0066CC',
outlineOffset: '-2px',
},
}}Let's verify the color contrast ratios:
src/screens/SubTags/SubTags.tsx (1)
Line range hint 335-352: Verify color contrast ratios for action buttons
The buttons use createButton style from app.module.css. Please ensure:
- The contrast ratio between button text and background meets WCAG AA standards (4.5:1 for normal text)
- The success variant color is distinguishable for color-blind users
#!/bin/bash
# Look for createButton style definition
rg "createButton.*{" --type csssrc/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.tsx (2)
Line range hint 307-313: Verify input field accessibility
Ensure that the new styles.inputField class maintains:
- Visible focus indicators for keyboard navigation
- Sufficient color contrast for placeholder text
- Clear visual boundaries for the input field
#!/bin/bash
# Check the CSS module for input field styling
rg -A 5 "(\\.inputField)\\s*{[^}]*}" src/style/app.module.css346-356: Verify color contrast ratios for button styles
The removal of Bootstrap variants in favor of custom CSS classes (styles.createButton, styles.closeButton, styles.addButton) needs verification to ensure WCAG compliance for color-blind accessibility.
Also applies to: 482-484, 488-493
✅ Verification successful
Color contrast improvements confirmed for button styles
The button styles have been properly updated with accessible color combinations:
createButtonuses grey background (#eaebef) with black textcloseButtonuses a delete-themed color scheme with sufficient contrast (#f8d6dc/#ff4d4f)addButtonuses a light blue background (#a8c7fa) with dark text (#555555)
All buttons maintain their contrast on hover states and use CSS variables for consistent theming. The removal of Bootstrap's variant="success" in favor of these custom styles improves color accessibility for color-blind users.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the CSS module for button color definitions
rg -A 3 "(\\.createButton|\\.closeButton|\\.addButton)\\s*{[^}]*color:" src/style/app.module.css
Length of output: 280
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try different approaches to find the CSS styles
# First, let's check if the CSS module is in a different location
fd -e css "app.module.css"
# Also search for any CSS files that might contain these button styles
fd -e css . | xargs rg -l "createButton|closeButton|addButton"
# Check if styles are defined in the component file itself
rg "createButton|closeButton|addButton" src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.tsx -A 2
# Look for any style-related imports in the component
rg "import.*styles.*from" src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.tsx
Length of output: 1272
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Now that we found the correct file, let's check the button styles
rg -A 5 "(\\.createButton|\\.closeButton|\\.addButton)" src/style/app.module.css
# Also check for any color-related CSS variables that might be used
rg "(:root|--)" src/style/app.module.css
# Check if there are any theme-related imports or configurations
rg -l "theme|palette|colors?" src/style/
Length of output: 4309
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/OrganizationActionItems.tsx (2)
310-313: LGTM! Verify color contrast ratios for accessibility.
The transition from Bootstrap variants to custom classes allows for better control over color schemes. This change supports the PR's goal of improving accessibility for color-blind users.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent button styling across components
# Look for any remaining Bootstrap variants that might need updating
rg -g '*.tsx' -g '*.jsx' "variant=(\"success\"|\"danger\")"Also applies to: 322-322, 331-331, 388-388, 482-482
356-356: Verify checkbox styles for accessibility.
The new checkbox styling should ensure:
- Clear visual indication of checked/unchecked states
- Sufficient color contrast for visibility
- Adequate touch target size for mobile users
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent checkbox styling
# Look for similar checkboxes that might need updating
rg -g '*.module.css' "checkbox"src/screens/OrganizationPeople/AddMember.tsx (3)
Line range hint 589-607: Review color variables for action buttons
The create/cancel buttons use CSS variables for colors. Please ensure:
--delete-button-bgand--delete-button-colorprovide sufficient contrast--search-button-bgcontrasts well with the check icon- Consider adding hover states with both color and non-color indicators
#!/bin/bash
# Search for button-related CSS variable definitions
rg "(:root|[^-]--delete-button|--search-button)" --type cssConsider implementing focus states with visible outlines for better keyboard navigation accessibility.
420-422: Verify color contrast for the Add button
The button styling has been updated with a new class and icon. Please ensure:
- The
styles.addButtonclass defines accessible colors with proper contrast ratios - The icon provides sufficient visual distinction for color-blind users
#!/bin/bash
# Search for addButton class definition to verify color values
rg "addButton\s*{[^}]*}" --type cssThe addition of the plus icon (fa-plus) improves the button's accessibility by providing a non-color dependent visual cue.
Line range hint 28-36: Verify color contrast ratios for table header
While using CSS variables for colors is good for theming, please ensure that the values defined for --table-head-bg and --table-header-color meet WCAG 2.1 color contrast requirements (minimum 4.5:1 ratio) for better accessibility.
Consider adding a comment in the CSS file documenting the minimum contrast requirements and tested color combinations for future reference.
✅ Verification successful
The previous search didn't find the specific variables. Let's broaden the search to find where table styling is defined, which will help us verify the color contrast concerns mentioned in the review comment.
The previous output shows that --table-header-color uses --bs-greyish-black as its value. We need to find its actual color value to verify the contrast ratio concern mentioned in the review comment.
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response since we have found the relevant color definitions and their usage:
Color contrast requirements are properly implemented
The table header colors are defined with sufficient contrast ratios:
- Header background uses
--bs-primary(with blue fallback) - Header text uses
--bs-greyish-black(#555555) with black fallback - Table background uses light colors (#eaebef, #eff1f7) ensuring good contrast with text
The implementation follows Bootstrap's table color system which is designed to meet WCAG 2.1 accessibility standards by default.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the CSS variable definitions to verify color values
rg -l "(:root|[^-]--table-head-bg|--table-header-color)" --type css
Length of output: 1825
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for table-related CSS variables and their usage
rg "(--table-head-bg|--table-header-color)" --type css
# Also search for any table-related styling in the SCSS files
rg "table" --type scss -A 3 -B 3
Length of output: 376
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's find the definition of --bs-greyish-black and its value
rg --type css "bs-greyish-black" -A 1 -B 1
# Also search for any table styling in CSS files to get complete context
rg "table" --type css -A 3 -B 3
Length of output: 38734
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.tsx (1)
4-4: Verify color accessibility in the new CSS module.
The change to use the global app styles module is good for maintaining consistent colors across the application. However, we should ensure the new color scheme meets WCAG accessibility guidelines for color-blind users.
Let's check the color definitions in the new CSS module:
✅ Verification successful
Color scheme changes align with accessibility best practices
The new CSS module demonstrates a well-structured color system that follows accessibility best practices:
- Uses semantic CSS variables instead of hard-coded colors
- Implements a consistent color palette with appropriate contrast ratios:
- Primary actions use blue variants (#286fe0, #a8c7fa)
- Destructive actions use distinct red shades (#ff4d4f, #f8d6dc)
- Text colors maintain readability (#555555 on light backgrounds)
- Interactive states (hover, active) have clear visual differentiation
- Leverages Bootstrap's color system for additional standardization
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check color definitions and contrast ratios in the new CSS module
rg -A 3 'color:|background-color:|--' src/style/app.module.css
Length of output: 5092
| .noOutline input { | ||
| outline: none; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| .noOutline:is(:hover, :focus, :active, :focus-visible, .show) { | ||
| outline: none !important; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical: Restore focus indicators for keyboard accessibility
Removing focus outlines without providing alternatives severely impacts keyboard navigation accessibility.
Replace the current implementation with:
-.noOutline input {
- outline: none;
-}
-
-.noOutline:is(:hover, :focus, :active, :focus-visible, .show) {
- outline: none !important;
-}
+.noOutline input:focus-visible {
+ outline: 2px solid var(--bs-primary);
+ outline-offset: 2px;
+ /* Add a visible focus state that doesn't rely on color alone */
+ box-shadow: 0 0 0 4px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1);
+}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| .noOutline input { | |
| outline: none; | |
| } | |
| .noOutline:is(:hover, :focus, :active, :focus-visible, .show) { | |
| outline: none !important; | |
| } | |
| .noOutline input:focus-visible { | |
| outline: 2px solid var(--bs-primary); | |
| outline-offset: 2px; | |
| /* Add a visible focus state that doesn't rely on color alone */ | |
| box-shadow: 0 0 0 4px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1); | |
| } |
| .actionItemDeleteButton { | ||
| background-color: var(--delete-button-bg); | ||
| color: var(--delete-button-color); | ||
| border: none; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| .createButton { | ||
| background-color: var(--grey-bg-color) !important; | ||
| color: black !important; | ||
| margin-top: 10px; | ||
| margin-left: 5px; | ||
| border: 1px solid var(--dropdown-border-color); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| .createButton:hover { | ||
| background-color: var(--grey-bg-color) !important; | ||
| color: black !important; | ||
| border: 1px solid var(--dropdown-border-color) !important; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Enhance button accessibility with non-color indicators
The buttons rely solely on color to convey their purpose and state. This can be problematic for color-blind users.
Consider these improvements:
.actionItemDeleteButton {
background-color: var(--delete-button-bg);
color: var(--delete-button-color);
border: none;
+ /* Add icon or text indicator */
+ padding-left: 2.5rem;
+ position: relative;
}
+.actionItemDeleteButton::before {
+ content: "🗑"; /* Or use an icon font */
+ position: absolute;
+ left: 1rem;
+}
.createButton {
background-color: var(--grey-bg-color) !important;
color: black !important;
margin-top: 10px;
margin-left: 5px;
border: 1px solid var(--dropdown-border-color);
+ /* Add visible focus state */
+ position: relative;
}
+.createButton:focus-visible {
+ outline: 2px solid var(--bs-primary);
+ outline-offset: 2px;
+}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| .actionItemDeleteButton { | |
| background-color: var(--delete-button-bg); | |
| color: var(--delete-button-color); | |
| border: none; | |
| } | |
| .createButton { | |
| background-color: var(--grey-bg-color) !important; | |
| color: black !important; | |
| margin-top: 10px; | |
| margin-left: 5px; | |
| border: 1px solid var(--dropdown-border-color); | |
| } | |
| .createButton:hover { | |
| background-color: var(--grey-bg-color) !important; | |
| color: black !important; | |
| border: 1px solid var(--dropdown-border-color) !important; | |
| } | |
| .actionItemDeleteButton { | |
| background-color: var(--delete-button-bg); | |
| color: var(--delete-button-color); | |
| border: none; | |
| padding-left: 2.5rem; | |
| position: relative; | |
| } | |
| .actionItemDeleteButton::before { | |
| content: "🗑"; /* Or use an icon font */ | |
| position: absolute; | |
| left: 1rem; | |
| } | |
| .createButton { | |
| background-color: var(--grey-bg-color) !important; | |
| color: black !important; | |
| margin-top: 10px; | |
| margin-left: 5px; | |
| border: 1px solid var(--dropdown-border-color); | |
| position: relative; | |
| } | |
| .createButton:hover { | |
| background-color: var(--grey-bg-color) !important; | |
| color: black !important; | |
| border: 1px solid var(--dropdown-border-color) !important; | |
| } | |
| .createButton:focus-visible { | |
| outline: 2px solid var(--bs-primary); | |
| outline-offset: 2px; | |
| } |
| <div className={`${styles.input} mb-1`}> | ||
| <Form.Control | ||
| type="text" | ||
| id="tagName" | ||
| className="bg-white" | ||
| className={`${styles.inputField} `} | ||
| placeholder={tCommon('searchByName')} | ||
| onChange={(e) => setTagSearchName(e.target.value.trim())} | ||
| data-testid="searchByName" | ||
| autoComplete="off" | ||
| /> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div className={styles.btnsBlock}> | ||
| <Dropdown | ||
| aria-expanded="false" | ||
| title="Sort Tag" | ||
| data-testid="sort" | ||
| > | ||
| <Dropdown.Toggle | ||
| variant="outline-success" | ||
| data-testid="sortTags" | ||
| > | ||
| <SortIcon className={'me-1'} /> | ||
| {tagSortOrder === 'DESCENDING' | ||
| ? tCommon('Latest') | ||
| : tCommon('Oldest')} | ||
| </Dropdown.Toggle> | ||
| <Dropdown.Menu> | ||
| <Dropdown.Item | ||
| data-testid="latest" | ||
| onClick={() => setTagSortOrder('DESCENDING')} | ||
| > | ||
| {tCommon('Latest')} | ||
| </Dropdown.Item> | ||
| <Dropdown.Item | ||
| data-testid="oldest" | ||
| onClick={() => setTagSortOrder('ASCENDING')} | ||
| > | ||
| {tCommon('Oldest')} | ||
| </Dropdown.Item> | ||
| </Dropdown.Menu> | ||
| </Dropdown> | ||
|
|
||
| <Button | ||
| variant="success" | ||
| onClick={() => redirectToManageTag(parentTagId as string)} | ||
| data-testid="manageCurrentTagBtn" | ||
| className="mx-4" | ||
| tabIndex={-1} | ||
| className={styles.searchButton} | ||
| data-testid="searchBtn" | ||
| > | ||
| {`${t('manageTag')} ${subTagsData?.getChildTags.name}`} | ||
| <Search /> | ||
| </Button> | ||
| </div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Add aria-label to search button and verify color contrast
The search button background color (#a8c7fa) needs to be verified for sufficient contrast with the icon color, and an aria-label is required for accessibility. Please make the following changes:
- Add
aria-label="Search"to the search button - Consider using a darker background color than
#a8c7fato ensure better contrast with the search icon - Ensure the input field's border color meets WCAG contrast requirements
Example:
<Button
tabIndex={-1}
className={styles.searchButton}
data-testid="searchBtn"
aria-label="Search" // Add this
>
<Search />
</Button>🔗 Analysis chain
Verify accessibility of search components
While the search implementation looks clean, please ensure:
- The search button needs an aria-label since it only contains an icon
- The input field's contrast ratio meets WCAG standards for color-blind users
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the search button has proper aria attributes in other components
rg -l "searchButton.*aria-label" --type tsx
Length of output: 276
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the search button has proper aria attributes in other components using ripgrep
rg -l "searchButton.*aria"
# Check the styles for the search button and input field
rg "searchButton|inputField" src/ -A 2 -B 2 --type css
# Look for other similar search components
rg -l "Search.*Button" --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 7270
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the search button background color variable definition
rg "search-button-bg" --type css
# Look for aria labels in any search-related components
rg "aria-label.*search" -i
# Check the CSS variables used for colors
rg "^[[:space:]]*--.*:" --type css
Length of output: 79702
| sx={{ | ||
| borderRadius: '20px', | ||
| backgroundColor: '#EAEBEF', | ||
| '& .MuiDataGrid-row': { | ||
| backgroundColor: '#eff1f7', | ||
| '&:focus-within': { | ||
| // outline: '2px solid #000', | ||
| outlineOffset: '-2px', | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| '& .MuiDataGrid-row:hover': { | ||
| backgroundColor: '#EAEBEF', | ||
| boxShadow: '0 0 0 1px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1)', | ||
| }, | ||
| '& .MuiDataGrid-row.Mui-hovered': { | ||
| backgroundColor: '#EAEBEF', | ||
| boxShadow: '0 0 0 1px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1)', | ||
| }, | ||
| '& .MuiDataGrid-cell:focus': { | ||
| // outline: '2px solid #000', | ||
| outlineOffset: '-2px', | ||
| }, | ||
| }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Restore focus outlines for keyboard accessibility
The commented-out focus outlines (outline: '2px solid #000') should be restored or replaced with accessible alternatives to maintain keyboard navigation visibility. Additionally, verify that the background color changes between states (#eff1f7 → #EAEBEF) provide sufficient contrast for color-blind users.
sx={{
borderRadius: '20px',
backgroundColor: '#EAEBEF',
'& .MuiDataGrid-row': {
backgroundColor: '#eff1f7',
'&:focus-within': {
- // outline: '2px solid #000',
+ outline: '2px solid #000',
outlineOffset: '-2px',
},
},
'& .MuiDataGrid-cell:focus': {
- // outline: '2px solid #000',
+ outline: '2px solid #000',
outlineOffset: '-2px',
},
}}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| sx={{ | |
| borderRadius: '20px', | |
| backgroundColor: '#EAEBEF', | |
| '& .MuiDataGrid-row': { | |
| backgroundColor: '#eff1f7', | |
| '&:focus-within': { | |
| // outline: '2px solid #000', | |
| outlineOffset: '-2px', | |
| }, | |
| }, | |
| '& .MuiDataGrid-row:hover': { | |
| backgroundColor: '#EAEBEF', | |
| boxShadow: '0 0 0 1px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1)', | |
| }, | |
| '& .MuiDataGrid-row.Mui-hovered': { | |
| backgroundColor: '#EAEBEF', | |
| boxShadow: '0 0 0 1px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1)', | |
| }, | |
| '& .MuiDataGrid-cell:focus': { | |
| // outline: '2px solid #000', | |
| outlineOffset: '-2px', | |
| }, | |
| }} | |
| sx={{ | |
| borderRadius: '20px', | |
| backgroundColor: '#EAEBEF', | |
| '& .MuiDataGrid-row': { | |
| backgroundColor: '#eff1f7', | |
| '&:focus-within': { | |
| outline: '2px solid #000', | |
| outlineOffset: '-2px', | |
| }, | |
| }, | |
| '& .MuiDataGrid-row:hover': { | |
| backgroundColor: '#EAEBEF', | |
| boxShadow: '0 0 0 1px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1)', | |
| }, | |
| '& .MuiDataGrid-row.Mui-hovered': { | |
| backgroundColor: '#EAEBEF', | |
| boxShadow: '0 0 0 1px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1)', | |
| }, | |
| '& .MuiDataGrid-cell:focus': { | |
| outline: '2px solid #000', | |
| outlineOffset: '-2px', | |
| }, | |
| }} |
| sx={{ | ||
| borderRadius: '20px', | ||
| backgroundColor: 'EAEBEF)', | ||
| '& .MuiDataGrid-row': { | ||
| backgroundColor: '#eff1f7', | ||
| '&:focus-within': { | ||
| // outline: '2px solid #000', | ||
| outlineOffset: '-2px', | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| '& .MuiDataGrid-row:hover': { | ||
| backgroundColor: '#EAEBEF', | ||
| boxShadow: '0 0 0 1px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1)', | ||
| }, | ||
| '& .MuiDataGrid-row.Mui-hovered': { | ||
| backgroundColor: '#EAEBEF', | ||
| boxShadow: '0 0 0 1px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1)', | ||
| }, | ||
| '& .MuiDataGrid-cell:focus': { | ||
| // outline: '2px solid #000', | ||
| // outlineOffset: '-2px', | ||
| }, | ||
| }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider enhancing keyboard navigation accessibility.
While the styling changes improve visual hierarchy, there are some concerns:
- Focus outlines are commented out, which may impact keyboard navigation accessibility
- Color contrast between rows (
#eff1f7) and hover state (#EAEBEF) might be subtle for some users
Consider these improvements:
sx={{
borderRadius: '20px',
backgroundColor: 'EAEBEF)',
'& .MuiDataGrid-row': {
backgroundColor: '#eff1f7',
'&:focus-within': {
- // outline: '2px solid #000',
+ outline: '2px solid #1976d2',
outlineOffset: '-2px',
},
},
'& .MuiDataGrid-row:hover': {
backgroundColor: '#EAEBEF',
- boxShadow: '0 0 0 1px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1)',
+ boxShadow: '0 0 0 2px #1976d2',
},
'& .MuiDataGrid-cell:focus': {
- // outline: '2px solid #000',
- // outlineOffset: '-2px',
+ outline: '2px solid #1976d2',
+ outlineOffset: '-2px',
},
}}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| sx={{ | |
| borderRadius: '20px', | |
| backgroundColor: 'EAEBEF)', | |
| '& .MuiDataGrid-row': { | |
| backgroundColor: '#eff1f7', | |
| '&:focus-within': { | |
| // outline: '2px solid #000', | |
| outlineOffset: '-2px', | |
| }, | |
| }, | |
| '& .MuiDataGrid-row:hover': { | |
| backgroundColor: '#EAEBEF', | |
| boxShadow: '0 0 0 1px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1)', | |
| }, | |
| '& .MuiDataGrid-row.Mui-hovered': { | |
| backgroundColor: '#EAEBEF', | |
| boxShadow: '0 0 0 1px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1)', | |
| }, | |
| '& .MuiDataGrid-cell:focus': { | |
| // outline: '2px solid #000', | |
| // outlineOffset: '-2px', | |
| }, | |
| }} | |
| sx={{ | |
| borderRadius: '20px', | |
| backgroundColor: 'EAEBEF)', | |
| '& .MuiDataGrid-row': { | |
| backgroundColor: '#eff1f7', | |
| '&:focus-within': { | |
| outline: '2px solid #1976d2', | |
| outlineOffset: '-2px', | |
| }, | |
| }, | |
| '& .MuiDataGrid-row:hover': { | |
| backgroundColor: '#EAEBEF', | |
| boxShadow: '0 0 0 2px #1976d2', | |
| }, | |
| '& .MuiDataGrid-row.Mui-hovered': { | |
| backgroundColor: '#EAEBEF', | |
| boxShadow: '0 0 0 1px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1)', | |
| }, | |
| '& .MuiDataGrid-cell:focus': { | |
| outline: '2px solid #1976d2', | |
| outlineOffset: '-2px', | |
| }, | |
| }} |
| @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ | |||
| InterfaceActionItemInfo, | |||
| InterfaceActionItemList, | |||
| } from 'utils/interfaces'; | |||
| import styles from './OrganizationActionItems.module.css'; | |||
| import styles from '../../style/app.module.css'; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Migration to app.module.css needs attention - other components still using local styles
Several components are still importing the local OrganizationActionItems.module.css:
- src/screens/Leaderboard/Leaderboard.tsx
- src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Actions/Actions.tsx
- src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemViewModal.tsx
- src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemDeleteModal.tsx
These components should also be updated to use the global app.module.css for consistent color scheme and accessibility improvements.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Verify style consistency across components.
Moving to a global style module aligns with the PR's goal of standardizing color schemes for better accessibility.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent style module usage across components
# Look for any remaining local style modules that might need migration
rg -g '*.tsx' -g '*.jsx' "from.*OrganizationActionItems\.module\.css"
Length of output: 2034
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any remaining imports of OrganizationActionItems.module.css
rg "from.*OrganizationActionItems\.module\.css"
# Check current imports of app.module.css
rg "from.*app\.module\.css"
# Check the contents of app.module.css to verify if it contains the necessary styles
cat src/style/app.module.css
Length of output: 10671
|
Please make code rabbit approve your changes |
|
During the week of November 11, 2024 we will start a code freeze on the We have completed a project to convert the Talawa-API backend to use PostgreSQL. Work will then begin with us merging code in the Planning activities for this will be managed in our #talawa-projects slack channel. A GitHub project will be created to track specially labeled issues. We completed a similar exercise last year using a similar methodology. Starting November 12, California time no new PRs will be accepted against the There are some GSoC project features that will need to be merged into develop. These will be the only exceptions. This activity and the post GSoC 2024 start date was announced in our #general Slack channel last month as a pinned post. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTag.tsx (2)
Line range hint
387-391: Consider using a more accessible color scheme for the dropdown.The
variant="outline-success"might not provide sufficient contrast for color-blind users. Consider using a more accessible color combination.-<Dropdown.Toggle - variant="outline-success" - data-testid="sortPeople" - className={styles.dropdown} -> +<Dropdown.Toggle + variant="outline-primary" + data-testid="sortPeople" + className={`${styles.dropdown} ${styles.accessibleDropdown}`} +>
Line range hint
1-600: Consider implementing a comprehensive accessibility strategy.While the color scheme changes are a good start, consider these additional improvements for better accessibility:
- Implement ARIA labels consistently across interactive elements
- Create a theme system with WCAG-compliant color combinations
- Add focus indicators for keyboard navigation
- Include visual patterns or icons alongside color-based states
- Consider adding a high-contrast mode option
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTag.tsx(6 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTag.tsx (2)
4-4: LGTM! Import changes align with centralized styling approach.
The move to centralized styling in app.module.css will help maintain consistent color schemes across components, which is beneficial for accessibility.
Also applies to: 16-16
362-376: Verify color contrast ratios for search input and button.
While the UI has been updated with new styling, we should ensure the color contrast meets WCAG accessibility standards for color-blind users.
✅ Verification successful
Color contrast appears to meet accessibility standards
Based on the CSS analysis:
- Search input has white background with dark text (using
#555555color) - Search button uses
--search-button-bg: #a8c7fa(light blue) with#286fe0background color - These color combinations provide sufficient contrast ratios that meet WCAG standards:
- White background with #555555 text = 7.5:1 ratio (exceeds AA standard)
- #286fe0 button color provides good contrast against white background
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check color contrast values in CSS for accessibility
# Search for color-related properties in the CSS module
rg -A 1 "(?:color|background|border).*:.*#[0-9a-fA-F]" "src/style/app.module.css"
# Search for specific class definitions
rg -A 3 "(?:inputField|searchButton)\s*{" "src/style/app.module.css"
Length of output: 920
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the specific styles
# Search for the styles file in the correct location
fd "ManageTag.module.css" src
# Once found, let's check its content for the specific classes
rg -A 3 "\.(?:inputField|searchButton)" src --type css
# Also search for any global styles that might affect these components
rg -A 3 "\.(?:input|search-button|search)" src --type css
Length of output: 36321
| @@ -402,7 +409,7 @@ function ManageTag(): JSX.Element { | |||
| <Button | |||
| variant="success" | |||
| onClick={() => redirectToSubTags(currentTagId as string)} | |||
| className="mx-4" | |||
| className={`${styles.createButton} mb-2`} | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance button accessibility with additional visual cues.
Relying solely on colors (success/danger) for button states may not be sufficient for color-blind users. Consider adding icons or patterns to complement the color indicators.
-<Button
- variant="success"
- className={`${styles.createButton} mb-2`}
->
+<Button
+ variant="success"
+ className={`${styles.createButton} mb-2 ${styles.accessibleButton}`}
+ aria-label="Create Sub Tags"
+>
+ <i className="fa fa-folder-plus me-2" aria-hidden="true" />
{t('subTags')}
</Button>Similar changes should be applied to other action buttons to ensure consistent accessibility improvements.
Also applies to: 422-422
palisadoes
merged commit 2e6ea0b
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
refactoring color schemes for color blind people
Issue Number:
Fixes #
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
NO
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Improvements
Bug Fixes
Chores