-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 811
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Upgraded dicebear to latest #2411
Upgraded dicebear to latest #2411
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request includes updates to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessWe have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team. Testing Your CodePlease make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if these conditions occur:
The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
scripts/__mocks__/@dicebear/core.ts (1)
3-3
: LGTM! Consider making the mock async.The mock correctly reflects the API change from
toDataUriSync
totoDataUri
in dicebear v9. However, since the actual implementation is now asynchronous, consider updating the mock to better match the real behavior:- toDataUri: jest.fn(() => 'mocked-data-uri'), + toDataUri: jest.fn(async () => 'mocked-data-uri'),This would ensure the mock better represents the actual API behavior, though the current implementation is still valid for testing purposes.
src/components/Avatar/Avatar.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-63
: Consider adding loading stateSince the avatar generation is now asynchronous, it would be good to handle the loading state to improve user experience.
Consider adding a loading state:
interface InterfaceAvatarProps { // ... existing props ... loadingComponent?: React.ReactNode; } const Avatar = ({ // ... existing props ... loadingComponent = null, }: InterfaceAvatarProps): JSX.Element => { const [svg, setSvg] = useState<string>(); const [isLoading, setIsLoading] = useState(true); useEffect(() => { setIsLoading(true); const generateAvatar = async () => { const uri = await createAvatar(initials, { size: size || 128, seed: name, radius: radius || 0, }).toDataUri(); setSvg(uri); setIsLoading(false); }; generateAvatar(); }, [name, size, radius]); if (isLoading && loadingComponent) { return <>{loadingComponent}</>; } return ( <div className={`${containerStyle ?? styles.imageContainer}`}> <img src={svg} alt={alt} className={avatarStyle ? avatarStyle : ''} data-testid={dataTestId ? dataTestId : ''} /> </div> ); };package.json (1)
11-11
: Consider optimizing the dicebear collections import.The
@dicebear/collection
package includes all avatar styles. To reduce bundle size, consider importing only the specific collections you need directly (e.g.,@dicebear/avatars-identicon-sprites
).
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.json
is excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
package.json
(1 hunks)scripts/__mocks__/@dicebear/core.ts
(1 hunks)src/components/Avatar/Avatar.tsx
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/components/Avatar/Avatar.tsx (1)
Line range hint 1-63
: Verify the avatar rendering behavior
Let's verify if there are any other components using dicebear that might need similar updates.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try another search strategy to verify this thoroughly.
No other components using dicebear avatar generation found
Based on the comprehensive search results, the Avatar component in src/components/Avatar/Avatar.tsx
is the only implementation using dicebear's avatar generation in the codebase. The only other references to createAvatar
and toDataUri
are in the test mock files (scripts/__mocks__/@dicebear/core.ts
), which are expected.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other components using dicebear
echo "Searching for other components using @dicebear packages..."
rg -l "@dicebear" --type ts --type tsx
# Search specifically for toDataUriSync usage that might have been missed
echo "Checking for any remaining toDataUriSync usage..."
rg "toDataUriSync" --type ts --type tsx
# Look for other avatar-related components
echo "Looking for other avatar-related components..."
fd -e tsx -e ts -g "*[aA]vatar*"
Length of output: 579
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for dicebear imports without specifying file types
echo "Searching for dicebear imports..."
rg "@dicebear"
# Search for avatar-related code patterns
echo "Searching for avatar creation patterns..."
ast-grep --pattern 'createAvatar($$$)'
# Search for any other potential avatar implementations
echo "Searching for potential avatar implementations..."
rg "toDataUri|createAvatar"
Length of output: 10464
package.json (1)
11-12
: LGTM! Verify the major version upgrade impact.
The upgrade from v8 to v9 looks good, but since this is a major version upgrade, please ensure:
- All breaking changes from the dicebear changelog are addressed
- Peer dependencies are compatible
- All usages of synchronous methods (like
toDataUriSync
) are converted to their async counterparts
Let's verify the usage of dicebear methods in the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Let me search for any remaining usages of dicebear methods to ensure all breaking changes are addressed.
Breaking changes have been properly addressed
The code review shows that:
- The Avatar component is already using the async
toDataUri()
method instead oftoDataUriSync()
- No other usages of dicebear methods were found in the codebase
- The upgrade from v8 to v9 has been properly implemented with the necessary API changes
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining synchronous method calls that need to be updated
rg "toDataUriSync"
# Search for other potential dicebear method usage patterns
rg "@dicebear" -A 5
Length of output: 23135
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any dicebear method usage in the codebase
ast-grep --pattern 'createAvatar($$$).toDataUriSync($$$)'
# Get the content of the Avatar component to analyze the implementation
cat src/components/Avatar/Avatar.tsx
Length of output: 1761
@adithyanotfound Once checkout have the avatars been correctly visualising in the admin/user portal after this upgrade? Post an image/video for the same |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #2411 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 98.28% 98.28%
========================================
Files 283 283
Lines 8229 8229
Branches 2379 2377 -2
========================================
Hits 8088 8088
Misses 132 132
Partials 9 9 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
3f6b41a
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop
* Added scripts for talawa websocket url * Fixed naming inconsistency Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Fixed naming inconsistencies * Added error handling Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Improved test coverage * Fixed scripts for websocketurl * updated INSTALLATION.md * Updated logic to handle duplicate entries * Fixed errors * Added tests * Undo changes to .env.example * Chore/organization people UI changes (#2358) * changed color scheme for the organization people screen * fix precommit * merge * Update pre-commit * fix conflicts * fix type checks * fix type checks * fix type checks * fix ts eslint errors * fix ts eslint errors * fix ts eslint errors * fix ts eslint errors * testing * testing * testing * reverted changes in yaml file * cr comments * Update pull-request.yml * cr comments * cr comments and single css file * CR comments * delete button margin from top * prettier for commit and pull request * remove hard coded colors * fix failing test cases * Upgraded dicebear (#2411) --------- Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Peter Harrison <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: ANKIT VARSHNEY <[email protected]>
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
bugfix
Issue Number:
Fixes #2409
Did you add tests for your changes?
Not required
Summary
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation