Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgraded dicebear to latest #2411

Merged

Conversation

adithyanotfound
Copy link
Contributor

@adithyanotfound adithyanotfound commented Nov 6, 2024

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

bugfix

Issue Number:

Fixes #2409

Did you add tests for your changes?

Not required

Summary

  1. Upgraded @dicebear/core and @dicebear/collection to latest
  2. Fixed tests and typescript errors

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

No

Have you read the contributing guide?

Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated avatar generation method to an asynchronous approach, improving performance and rendering timing.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Upgraded dependencies for improved functionality and potential bug fixes in avatar generation libraries.
  • Documentation

    • Updated method names for clarity in mock implementations.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 6, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request includes updates to the package.json file, upgrading the @dicebear/collection and @dicebear/core packages from version 8.0.2 to 9.2.2. Additionally, the mock implementation of the createAvatar function in scripts/__mocks__/@dicebear/core.ts has been modified to rename toDataUriSync to toDataUri. In the Avatar component located in src/components/Avatar/Avatar.tsx, the method for generating the avatar image has been updated from toDataUriSync() to the asynchronous toDataUri().

Changes

File Path Change Summary
package.json Updated @dicebear/collection and @dicebear/core from ^8.0.2 to ^9.2.2
scripts/__mocks__/@dicebear/core.ts Renamed method toDataUriSync to toDataUri in the mock implementation
src/components/Avatar/Avatar.tsx Replaced toDataUriSync() with toDataUri() for avatar image generation

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Upgrade the @dicebear/core and @dicebear/collection packages (2409)
Update code to accommodate changes in syntax, functions, methods, and classes (2409)
Remove any unused or unnecessary packages (2409) No packages were removed or assessed.
Review and resolve any conflicts that may arise during the upgrade process (2409) Unclear if conflicts were reviewed.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

ignore-sensitive-files-pr

Suggested reviewers

  • varshith257

Poem

In the garden where avatars play,
New versions bloom, brightening the day.
From sync to async, a leap we take,
With mocked data, our changes awake.
Hopping along, we celebrate cheer,
For upgrades and tweaks bring us near! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 6, 2024

Our Pull Request Approval Process

We have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team.

Testing Your Code

Please make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if these conditions occur:

  1. The overall code coverage drops below the target threshold of the repository
  2. Any file in the pull request has code coverage levels below the repository threshold
  3. Merge conflicts

The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

@varshith257 varshith257 added the ignore-sensitive-files-pr The contributor has a legitimate reason for editiing protected files label Nov 6, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
scripts/__mocks__/@dicebear/core.ts (1)

3-3: LGTM! Consider making the mock async.

The mock correctly reflects the API change from toDataUriSync to toDataUri in dicebear v9. However, since the actual implementation is now asynchronous, consider updating the mock to better match the real behavior:

-    toDataUri: jest.fn(() => 'mocked-data-uri'),
+    toDataUri: jest.fn(async () => 'mocked-data-uri'),

This would ensure the mock better represents the actual API behavior, though the current implementation is still valid for testing purposes.

src/components/Avatar/Avatar.tsx (1)

Line range hint 1-63: Consider adding loading state

Since the avatar generation is now asynchronous, it would be good to handle the loading state to improve user experience.

Consider adding a loading state:

interface InterfaceAvatarProps {
  // ... existing props ...
  loadingComponent?: React.ReactNode;
}

const Avatar = ({
  // ... existing props ...
  loadingComponent = null,
}: InterfaceAvatarProps): JSX.Element => {
  const [svg, setSvg] = useState<string>();
  const [isLoading, setIsLoading] = useState(true);

  useEffect(() => {
    setIsLoading(true);
    const generateAvatar = async () => {
      const uri = await createAvatar(initials, {
        size: size || 128,
        seed: name,
        radius: radius || 0,
      }).toDataUri();
      setSvg(uri);
      setIsLoading(false);
    };
    generateAvatar();
  }, [name, size, radius]);

  if (isLoading && loadingComponent) {
    return <>{loadingComponent}</>;
  }

  return (
    <div className={`${containerStyle ?? styles.imageContainer}`}>
      <img
        src={svg}
        alt={alt}
        className={avatarStyle ? avatarStyle : ''}
        data-testid={dataTestId ? dataTestId : ''}
      />
    </div>
  );
};
package.json (1)

11-11: Consider optimizing the dicebear collections import.

The @dicebear/collection package includes all avatar styles. To reduce bundle size, consider importing only the specific collections you need directly (e.g., @dicebear/avatars-identicon-sprites).

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3694271 and 760bab3.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
  • scripts/__mocks__/@dicebear/core.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/components/Avatar/Avatar.tsx (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/components/Avatar/Avatar.tsx (1)

Line range hint 1-63: Verify the avatar rendering behavior

Let's verify if there are any other components using dicebear that might need similar updates.

✅ Verification successful

Let me try another search strategy to verify this thoroughly.


No other components using dicebear avatar generation found

Based on the comprehensive search results, the Avatar component in src/components/Avatar/Avatar.tsx is the only implementation using dicebear's avatar generation in the codebase. The only other references to createAvatar and toDataUri are in the test mock files (scripts/__mocks__/@dicebear/core.ts), which are expected.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for other components using dicebear
echo "Searching for other components using @dicebear packages..."
rg -l "@dicebear" --type ts --type tsx

# Search specifically for toDataUriSync usage that might have been missed
echo "Checking for any remaining toDataUriSync usage..."
rg "toDataUriSync" --type ts --type tsx

# Look for other avatar-related components
echo "Looking for other avatar-related components..."
fd -e tsx -e ts -g "*[aA]vatar*"

Length of output: 579


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for dicebear imports without specifying file types
echo "Searching for dicebear imports..."
rg "@dicebear"

# Search for avatar-related code patterns
echo "Searching for avatar creation patterns..."
ast-grep --pattern 'createAvatar($$$)'

# Search for any other potential avatar implementations
echo "Searching for potential avatar implementations..."
rg "toDataUri|createAvatar"

Length of output: 10464

package.json (1)

11-12: LGTM! Verify the major version upgrade impact.

The upgrade from v8 to v9 looks good, but since this is a major version upgrade, please ensure:

  1. All breaking changes from the dicebear changelog are addressed
  2. Peer dependencies are compatible
  3. All usages of synchronous methods (like toDataUriSync) are converted to their async counterparts

Let's verify the usage of dicebear methods in the codebase:

✅ Verification successful

Let me search for any remaining usages of dicebear methods to ensure all breaking changes are addressed.


Breaking changes have been properly addressed

The code review shows that:

  1. The Avatar component is already using the async toDataUri() method instead of toDataUriSync()
  2. No other usages of dicebear methods were found in the codebase
  3. The upgrade from v8 to v9 has been properly implemented with the necessary API changes
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining synchronous method calls that need to be updated
rg "toDataUriSync" 

# Search for other potential dicebear method usage patterns
rg "@dicebear" -A 5

Length of output: 23135


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any dicebear method usage in the codebase
ast-grep --pattern 'createAvatar($$$).toDataUriSync($$$)'

# Get the content of the Avatar component to analyze the implementation
cat src/components/Avatar/Avatar.tsx

Length of output: 1761

src/components/Avatar/Avatar.tsx Show resolved Hide resolved
@varshith257
Copy link
Member

@adithyanotfound Once checkout have the avatars been correctly visualising in the admin/user portal after this upgrade? Post an image/video for the same

@adithyanotfound
Copy link
Contributor Author

Screenshot 2024-11-06 at 9 02 42 PM

@varshith257

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 6, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.28%. Comparing base (c858121) to head (3b3d694).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #2411   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    98.28%   98.28%           
========================================
  Files          283      283           
  Lines         8229     8229           
  Branches      2379     2377    -2     
========================================
  Hits          8088     8088           
  Misses         132      132           
  Partials         9        9           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@varshith257 varshith257 merged commit 3f6b41a into PalisadoesFoundation:develop Nov 6, 2024
11 of 12 checks passed
adithyanotfound added a commit to adithyanotfound/talawa-admin that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2024
palisadoes added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2024
* Added scripts for talawa websocket url

* Fixed naming inconsistency

Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Fixed naming inconsistencies

* Added error handling

Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Improved test coverage

* Fixed scripts for websocketurl

* updated INSTALLATION.md

* Updated logic to handle duplicate entries

* Fixed errors

* Added tests

* Undo changes to .env.example

* Chore/organization people UI changes (#2358)

* changed color scheme for the organization people screen

* fix precommit

* merge

* Update pre-commit

* fix conflicts

* fix type checks

* fix type checks

* fix type checks

* fix ts eslint errors

* fix ts eslint errors

* fix ts eslint errors

* fix ts eslint errors

* testing

* testing

* testing

* reverted changes in yaml file

* cr comments

* Update pull-request.yml

* cr comments

* cr comments and single css file

* CR comments

* delete button margin from top

* prettier for commit and pull request

* remove hard coded colors

* fix failing test cases

* Upgraded dicebear (#2411)

---------

Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Peter Harrison <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: ANKIT VARSHNEY <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ignore-sensitive-files-pr The contributor has a legitimate reason for editiing protected files
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants