feat: Add people to tag functaionality (GSoC) #2355
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several enhancements across multiple translation files and components related to tag management in the application. New translation keys for user feedback on tag assignments have been added in English, French, Hindi, Spanish, and Chinese locales. Additionally, a new React component, Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessWe have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team. Testing Your CodePlease make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if these conditions occur:
The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 13
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (13)
src/GraphQl/Mutations/TagMutations.ts (1)
76-81: Consider enhancing the JSDoc documentation.While the documentation is good, it could be more specific about the return value and provide an example usage.
/** * GraphQL mutation to add people to tag. * * @param tagId - Id of the tag to be assigned. * @param userIds - Ids of the users to assign to. + * @returns The _id of the updated tag. + * @example + * ```typescript + * const response = await client.mutate({ + * mutation: ADD_PEOPLE_TO_TAG, + * variables: { + * tagId: "tag123", + * userIds: ["user1", "user2"] + * } + * }); + * ``` */src/components/AddPeopleToTag/AddPeopleToTagsMocks.ts (1)
4-156: Consider adding more test scenarios for edge cases.While the current mocks cover the basic flow, consider adding test scenarios for:
- Empty result sets
- Maximum page size limits
- Special characters in user names
- Duplicate user selections
Example addition:
// Add to MOCKS array { request: { query: USER_TAGS_MEMBERS_TO_ASSIGN_TO, variables: { id: '2', first: 7, }, }, result: { data: { getUserTag: { name: 'empty_tag', usersToAssignTo: { edges: [], pageInfo: { hasNextPage: false, hasPreviousPage: false, startCursor: null, endCursor: null, }, totalCount: 0, }, }, }, }, }src/components/AddPeopleToTag/AddPeopleToTag.test.tsx (3)
60-80: Add JSDoc documentation for the render utility.The renderAddPeopleToTagModal utility function would benefit from JSDoc documentation explaining its purpose and parameters.
+/** + * Renders the AddPeopleToTag component with necessary providers for testing + * @param props - The props to pass to the AddPeopleToTag component + * @param link - The Apollo link to use for mocking GraphQL operations + * @returns The rendered component with testing utilities + */ const renderAddPeopleToTagModal = ( props: InterfaceAddPeopleToTagProps, link: ApolloLink, ): RenderResult => {
82-89: Remove commented code and improve test setup.The commented
cache.reset()line should be either removed or implemented if needed.beforeEach(() => { jest.mock('react-router-dom', () => ({ ...jest.requireActual('react-router-dom'), useParams: () => ({ orgId: 'orgId' }), })); - // cache.reset(); });
106-114: Improve error test description and assertions.The error test description could be more specific, and the assertions could be more comprehensive.
-test('Renders error component when when query is unsuccessful', async () => { +test('Displays error state when members query fails', async () => { const { queryByText } = renderAddPeopleToTagModal(props, link2); await wait(); await waitFor(() => { expect(queryByText(translations.addPeople)).not.toBeInTheDocument(); + expect(queryByText(translations.errorOccurred)).toBeInTheDocument(); + expect(screen.queryByTestId('selectMemberBtn')).not.toBeInTheDocument(); }); });src/utils/interfaces.ts (1)
235-250: Add JSDoc documentation for better maintainability.Consider adding JSDoc documentation to describe the purpose and usage of this interface, especially since it's used in multiple places.
+/** + * Interface representing paginated tag member data. + * Used for both assigned members and members available for assignment. + * @property edges - Array of nodes containing user data + * @property pageInfo - Cursor-based pagination information + * @property totalCount - Total number of members + */ interface InterfaceTagMembersData { edges: { node: {src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTag.tsx (3)
Line range hint
124-146: Consider enhancing error handling and user feedbackWhile the basic error handling is in place, consider these improvements:
- Add specific error messages for different error types (network, validation, etc.)
- Implement retry logic for failed queries
- Add error boundaries to contain GraphQL errors
Example implementation:
if (userTagAssignedMembersError || orgUserTagsAncestorsError) { + const getErrorMessage = (error: ApolloError) => { + if (error.networkError) { + return 'Network error occurred. Please check your connection.'; + } + if (error.graphQLErrors.length > 0) { + return `Server error: ${error.graphQLErrors[0].message}`; + } + return error.message; + }; + return ( <div className={`${styles.errorContainer} bg-white rounded-4 my-3`}> <div className={styles.errorMessage}> <WarningAmberRounded className={styles.errorIcon} fontSize="large" /> <h6 className="fw-bold text-danger text-center"> Error occured while loading{' '} {userTagAssignedMembersError ? 'assigned users' : 'tag ancestors'} <br /> - {userTagAssignedMembersError - ? userTagAssignedMembersError.message - : orgUserTagsAncestorsError?.message} + {userTagAssignedMembersError + ? getErrorMessage(userTagAssignedMembersError) + : getErrorMessage(orgUserTagsAncestorsError!)} </h6> + <Button + variant="primary" + onClick={() => { + userTagAssignedMembersError && userTagAssignedMembersRefetch(); + }} + > + Retry + </Button> </div> </div> ); }
436-442: Document prop types for AddPeopleToTag componentWhile the integration is clean, consider adding JSDoc documentation for the props to improve maintainability.
Example:
interface AddPeopleToTagProps { /** Controls the visibility of the modal */ addPeopleToTagModalIsOpen: boolean; /** Callback to hide the modal */ hideAddPeopleToTagModal: () => void; /** Callback to refresh the assigned members data */ refetchAssignedMembersData: () => void; /** Translation function for the component */ t: TFunction; /** Translation function for common strings */ tCommon: TFunction; }
Based on the evidence gathered from the shell scripts, I can now provide the final response:
Search functionality is missing and needs accessibility improvements
The search functionality in ManageTag.tsx is incomplete:
- No search handler is implemented despite having a search input and button
- Missing aria-label for screen reader accessibility
- No state management for search functionality
- Search button click handler is not implemented
Similar components in the codebase (Users, Requests, Organizations) implement proper search handling with
handleSearch,handleSearchByEnter, andhandleSearchByBtnClickfunctions, suggesting this component should follow the same pattern.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
284-299: Implement search functionality and improve accessibilityThe search input appears to be non-functional and lacks proper accessibility attributes:
- No search handler is implemented
- Missing aria-label for screen readers
<Form.Control type="text" id="userName" className="bg-white" placeholder={tCommon('search')} data-testid="searchByName" autoComplete="off" + aria-label={tCommon('search')} + onChange={(e) => handleSearch(e.target.value)} required />Let's verify if the search functionality is implemented elsewhere:
Let me check the specific file and its implementation to verify the search functionality.
Let me check if there's any search-related state or handlers in the ManageTag component.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for handleSearch function implementation rg -g '*.{ts,tsx}' 'handleSearch.*=' src/Length of output: 2375
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the ManageTag component implementation rg -g '*.{ts,tsx}' -A 10 'function ManageTag' src/Length of output: 841
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for search-related code in ManageTag.tsx rg -g 'ManageTag.tsx' -C 10 'search|filter|handleSearch' src/Length of output: 1598
public/locales/en/translation.json (1)
337-337: Consider enhancing the success message for better user feedback.The success message could be more informative by including the number of people the tag was assigned to.
- "successfullyAssignedToPeople": "Tag assigned successfully", + "successfullyAssignedToPeople": "Tag assigned successfully to {count} {count, plural, one {person} other {people}}",This change would provide users with more detailed feedback about their action's impact. The plural form handling ensures grammatically correct messages for both single and multiple assignments.
public/locales/sp/translation.json (1)
335-338: LGTM! The translations are accurate and consistent.The Spanish translations are grammatically correct and maintain consistency with the existing translations in the file. The terms used are appropriate for a Spanish-speaking audience and properly convey the meaning of the English source text.
Consider making "Asignar" more specific by adding "personas" as the direct object:
- "assignPeople": "Asignar" + "assignPeople": "Asignar personas"This would make the action more explicit to Spanish-speaking users.
src/components/AddPeopleToTag/AddPeopleToTag.tsx (2)
211-211: Use template literals for string concatenationFor better readability and consistency, consider using template literals instead of string concatenation when displaying the user's full name.
Apply this diff:
- {params.row.firstName + ' ' + params.row.lastName} + {`${params.row.firstName} ${params.row.lastName}`}
262-262: UseonSubmitinstead ofonSubmitCaptureunless intentionalThe
onSubmitCaptureevent handler captures the event before it bubbles up. If there's no specific need for this behavior, it's recommended to useonSubmitfor form submissions.Apply this diff:
- <Form onSubmitCapture={addPeopleToCurrentTag}> + <Form onSubmit={addPeopleToCurrentTag}>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (15)
- public/locales/en/translation.json (1 hunks)
- public/locales/fr/translation.json (1 hunks)
- public/locales/hi/translation.json (1 hunks)
- public/locales/sp/translation.json (1 hunks)
- public/locales/zh/translation.json (1 hunks)
- src/GraphQl/Mutations/TagMutations.ts (1 hunks)
- src/GraphQl/Queries/userTagQueries.ts (1 hunks)
- src/components/AddPeopleToTag/AddPeopleToTag.module.css (1 hunks)
- src/components/AddPeopleToTag/AddPeopleToTag.test.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/AddPeopleToTag/AddPeopleToTag.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/AddPeopleToTag/AddPeopleToTagsMocks.ts (1 hunks)
- src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTag.test.tsx (3 hunks)
- src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTag.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTagMocks.ts (2 hunks)
- src/utils/interfaces.ts (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/components/AddPeopleToTag/AddPeopleToTag.module.css
🔇 Additional comments (21)
src/GraphQl/Mutations/TagMutations.ts (1)
83-89: LGTM! Well-structured mutation implementation.The new
ADD_PEOPLE_TO_TAGmutation is well-implemented with proper typing and follows the established patterns in the codebase. The use of non-nullable types (ID!and[ID!]!) ensures type safety.src/GraphQl/Queries/userTagQueries.ts (1)
87-127: LGTM for the overall query structure!The query is well-structured with:
- Clear documentation
- Consistent pagination parameters
- Essential fields for pagination info
- Proper error handling through non-null types
src/components/AddPeopleToTag/AddPeopleToTagsMocks.ts (3)
1-3: LGTM! Clean imports using absolute paths.
4-156: Well-structured mock data with proper pagination implementation!The mock data correctly implements cursor-based pagination with consistent totalCount and proper page info flags.
1-169: Verify API contract with talawa-api#2552.Since this PR is linked to API changes (talawa-api#2552), let's verify that the mock data structure matches the API contract.
✅ Verification successful
Mock data structure aligns with GraphQL schema and interfaces
The mock data structure in
AddPeopleToTagsMocks.tscorrectly implements:
- The
AddPeopleToUserTagmutation with requiredtagIdanduserIdsparameters- The
UserTagDetailsquery with proper pagination parameters and response structure- The
InterfaceQueryUserTagsMembersToAssignTointerface with all required fields🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the mock data structure matches the API schema # Test: Check if the API schema matches our assumptions gh api repos/PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api/pulls/2552 --jq '.files[].filename' | while read -r file; do if [[ $file == *"schema"* || $file == *"type"* ]]; then echo "Analyzing schema file: $file" gh api repos/PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api/pulls/2552/files | \ jq -r ".[] | select(.filename == \"$file\") | .patch" fi doneLength of output: 122
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's verify the GraphQL schema and mutations in the current codebase # Check the GraphQL mutation definition echo "Checking ADD_PEOPLE_TO_TAG mutation:" rg -A 5 "ADD_PEOPLE_TO_TAG" --type ts echo -e "\nChecking USER_TAGS_MEMBERS_TO_ASSIGN_TO query:" rg -A 5 "USER_TAGS_MEMBERS_TO_ASSIGN_TO" --type ts # Look for related test files echo -e "\nChecking related test files:" fd -e test.ts -e spec.ts "AddPeopleToTag"Length of output: 6698
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the actual GraphQL query/mutation definitions and interfaces echo "Checking GraphQL mutation definition:" rg -p "mutation AddPeopleToUserTag" --type ts -A 5 echo -e "\nChecking GraphQL query definition:" rg -p "query UserTagDetails" --type ts -A 10 echo -e "\nChecking related interfaces:" rg "InterfaceQueryUserTagsMembersToAssignTo" --type ts -A 10Length of output: 6238
src/components/AddPeopleToTag/AddPeopleToTag.test.tsx (2)
1-25: LGTM! Well-structured imports and setup.The import statements are comprehensive and well-organized, including all necessary testing utilities and dependencies.
1-194: Overall implementation is robust and well-tested!The test suite provides comprehensive coverage of the AddPeopleToTag component's functionality, including happy paths and error scenarios. The suggested improvements above would enhance the maintainability and reliability of the tests, but the current implementation is already solid.
src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTag.test.tsx (2)
103-103: LGTM! Improved test suite description.The updated description "Manage Tag Page" better reflects the component being tested.
294-296: LGTM! Improved assertion syntax.The change to use
toHaveBeenCalledWithfollows Jest best practices for verifying mock function calls.src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTagMocks.ts (2)
5-5: LGTM! Import follows existing patterns.The new query import is properly grouped with related queries and follows the established naming convention.
189-193: Verify query implementation matches API contract.Let's verify that the query structure aligns with the API implementation referenced in PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#2552.
✅ Verification successful
Query implementation matches API contract
The query implementation in
src/GraphQl/Queries/userTagQueries.tsshows that the query accepts all necessary pagination parameters (after,before,first,last), and the mock usage inManageTagMocks.tscorrectly uses theidandfirstparameters, which are valid according to the query definition.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the query definition to verify the contract ast-grep --pattern 'const USER_TAGS_MEMBERS_TO_ASSIGN_TO = gql` query $_($id: ID!, $first: Int) { $$$ } `'Length of output: 116
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a broader search for the query definition rg "USER_TAGS_MEMBERS_TO_ASSIGN_TO" -A 10Length of output: 6660
src/utils/interfaces.ts (2)
266-269: LGTM! Well-structured interface following established patterns.The new interface is well-designed, reusing the
InterfaceTagMembersDatatype and following the naming conventions consistently.
258-258: Verify all consumers of InterfaceQueryUserTagsAssignedMembers.This is a breaking change that modifies the structure of
usersAssignedTo. Let's verify all usage locations to ensure they're updated accordingly.✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the new
InterfaceTagMembersDatatype and its usage to ensure all consumers are properly updated.
Let me check the GraphQL schema to understand the structure of
InterfaceTagMembersDataand verify if it matches the usage patterns.
Based on the findings, I can now generate the final response:
The interface change is correctly implemented across all consumers
The
InterfaceTagMembersDatainterface follows the same structure as used in the consuming components:
- It provides
edges.nodewith_id,firstName, andlastNamefields- All usage locations (
SubTags.tsx,OrganizationTags.tsx, andManageTag.tsx) accessusersAssignedTo.totalCount,usersAssignedTo.edges, andusersAssignedTo.pageInfowhich align with the interface definition🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for all usages of InterfaceQueryUserTagsAssignedMembers echo "Searching for interface usage..." rg "InterfaceQueryUserTagsAssignedMembers" -l # Search for direct access to usersAssignedTo property echo -e "\nSearching for usersAssignedTo access patterns..." rg "usersAssignedTo\." -A 2Length of output: 1379
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the definition of InterfaceTagMembersData echo "Searching for InterfaceTagMembersData definition..." rg "interface InterfaceTagMembersData" -A 5 # Check ManageTag component implementation for usage patterns echo -e "\nChecking ManageTag implementation..." rg "getUserTag.*usersAssignedTo" -A 2 src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTag.tsx # Check if there are any GraphQL queries using this type echo -e "\nChecking GraphQL queries..." fd -e graphql -x cat {}Length of output: 32235
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for InterfaceTagMembersData definition echo "Searching for InterfaceTagMembersData definition..." rg "InterfaceTagMembersData" -A 10 src/utils/interfaces.ts # Check GraphQL query structure for usersAssignedTo echo -e "\nChecking GraphQL query structure..." fd -e graphql -x rg "usersAssignedTo.*edges" {} \;Length of output: 997
src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTag.tsx (2)
26-26: LGTM: Import statement follows project conventionsThe import of the new AddPeopleToTag component follows the established project structure.
Line range hint
43-44: LGTM: Modal state management follows React best practicesThe state management for the AddPeopleToTag modal is well-implemented with clear naming and proper TypeScript typing.
Also applies to: 52-58
public/locales/zh/translation.json (1)
335-338: LGTM! The Chinese translations for tag management look good.The new translations are grammatically correct and consistent with the application's terminology.
Let's verify the consistency of these translations across other locale files:
✅ Verification successful
Translation keys are consistent across all locale files
The verification confirms that all the new Chinese translations have corresponding entries in English (en), French (fr), Hindi (hi), and Spanish (sp) locale files. The translations are properly structured and maintain semantic consistency across languages:
- "subTags" is appropriately translated as "Sub Tags", "Sous-étiquettes", "उप-टैग्स", and "Subetiquetas"
- "assignedToAll" maintains the same meaning across all languages
- "successfullyAssignedToPeople" conveys the success message consistently
- "assignPeople" is translated as a concise action verb in all languages
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if the same keys exist in other locale files # Expected: The keys should exist in all locale files (en, fr, hi, sp) for key in "subTags" "assignedToAll" "successfullyAssignedToPeople" "assignPeople"; do echo "Checking key: $key" for locale in en fr hi sp; do rg -U "\"$key\":" "public/locales/$locale/translation.json" done doneLength of output: 2798
public/locales/en/translation.json (1)
336-338: LGTM! The new translation keys are well-structured.The added translation keys in the
manageTagsection are clear, consistent, and align well with the tag assignment functionality.public/locales/hi/translation.json (2)
335-338: LGTM! Hindi translations for tag management look accurate.The new translations for tag management functionality are properly formatted and convey the correct meaning in Hindi:
- "उप-टैग्स" (sub-tags)
- "सभी को टैग असाइन किया गया" (assigned to all)
- "टैग सफलतापूर्वक असाइन किया गया" (successfully assigned)
- "असाइन करें" (assign)
Line range hint
1-1000: Verify consistency with English translationsThe translations appear accurate, but we should verify that all new tag management related keys exist in the English locale file as well.
✅ Verification successful
Tag management translations are consistent across English and Hindi locales
The verification shows that all tag management related keys are present in both English and Hindi translation files with appropriate translations. The structure and hierarchy of keys match perfectly between both files.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the same keys exist in English translations echo "Checking for tag management keys in English translations..." rg -A 3 '"manageTag":\s*{' public/locales/en/translation.jsonLength of output: 288
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if tag management related keys exist in English translations echo "Checking for tag management related keys in English and Hindi translations..." echo -e "\nChecking English translations:" rg "\"organizationTags\":" public/locales/en/translation.json -A 20 echo -e "\nChecking Hindi translations:" rg "\"organizationTags\":" public/locales/hi/translation.json -A 20Length of output: 1921
public/locales/fr/translation.json (1)
335-335: LGTM: Translation is accurate and clear.The translation for
subTagsas "Sous-étiquettes" is grammatically correct and effectively conveys the hierarchical relationship.src/components/AddPeopleToTag/AddPeopleToTag.tsx (1)
246-369: Ensure consistency in component structure and error handlingOverall, the component is well-structured and follows good practices. The use of state management, GraphQL queries, and mutations is appropriate.
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #2355 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 97.98% 97.99%
========================================
Files 244 246 +2
Lines 6949 7020 +71
Branches 2009 2026 +17
========================================
+ Hits 6809 6879 +70
- Misses 130 131 +1
Partials 10 10 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
@coderabbitai made the necessary changes, all good now? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
src/components/AddPeopleToTag/AddPeopleToTag.tsx (2)
77-83: Consider extracting pagination size to a constant.The hardcoded value
7forfirstparameter could be moved to a named constant for better maintainability.+const ITEMS_PER_PAGE = 7; + const { data: userTagsMembersToAssignToData, loading: userTagsMembersToAssignToLoading, error: userTagsMembersToAssignToError, fetchMore: fetchMoreMembersToAssignTo, } = useQuery(USER_TAGS_MEMBERS_TO_ASSIGN_TO, { variables: { id: currentTagId, - first: 7, + first: ITEMS_PER_PAGE, }, skip: !addPeopleToTagModalIsOpen, });
85-119: Use the same constant for pagination in loadMoreMembersToAssignTo.For consistency, use the same constant for the
firstparameter here as well.const loadMoreMembersToAssignTo = (): void => { fetchMoreMembersToAssignTo({ variables: { - first: 7, // Load 7 more items + first: ITEMS_PER_PAGE, after: userTagsMembersToAssignToData?.getUserTag.usersToAssignTo.pageInfo .endCursor, }, // ... rest of the function }); };public/locales/zh/translation.json (2)
335-342: Fix indentation to match file style.The translations are correct, but the indentation of the new keys doesn't match the file's style. Consider adjusting the indentation to maintain consistency.
- "subTags": "子标签", - "assignedToAll": "标签分配给所有人", - "successfullyAssignedToPeople": "标签分配成功", - "assignPeople": "分配", - "errorOccurredWhileLoadingMembers": "加载成员时出错", - "userName": "用户名", - "actions": "操作", - "noOneSelected": "未选择任何人" + "subTags": "子标签", + "assignedToAll": "标签分配给所有人", + "successfullyAssignedToPeople": "标签分配成功", + "assignPeople": "分配", + "errorOccurredWhileLoadingMembers": "加载成员时出错", + "userName": "用户名", + "actions": "操作", + "noOneSelected": "未选择任何人"
336-337: Consider more idiomatic Chinese translations.While the translations are functionally correct, they could be more natural in Chinese:
"assignedToAll": Consider "标签已分配给所有人" instead of "标签分配给所有人" to better indicate the completed state"successfullyAssignedToPeople": Consider "标签分配已完成" instead of "标签分配成功" for a more natural expressionpublic/locales/hi/translation.json (1)
335-342: Translations are accurate and well-structured!The Hindi translations for the tag management functionality are linguistically accurate and maintain consistency with the application's terminology.
Consider adding section comments for better maintainability.
Add comments to group related keys for better readability:
"manageTag": { + // Tag hierarchy related translations "subTags": "उप-टैग्स", + // Tag assignment related translations "assignedToAll": "सभी को टैग असाइन किया गया", "successfullyAssignedToPeople": "टैग सफलतापूर्वक असाइन किया गया", "assignPeople": "असाइन करें", + // Error and status messages "errorOccurredWhileLoadingMembers": "सदस्यों को लोड करते समय त्रुटि हुई", + // Table column headers and empty states "userName": "उपयोगकर्ता नाम", "actions": "क्रियाएँ", "noOneSelected": "कोई चयनित नहीं"
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
- public/locales/en/translation.json (1 hunks)
- public/locales/fr/translation.json (1 hunks)
- public/locales/hi/translation.json (1 hunks)
- public/locales/sp/translation.json (1 hunks)
- public/locales/zh/translation.json (1 hunks)
- src/components/AddPeopleToTag/AddPeopleToTag.test.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/AddPeopleToTag/AddPeopleToTag.tsx (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- public/locales/en/translation.json
- public/locales/fr/translation.json
- src/components/AddPeopleToTag/AddPeopleToTag.test.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
src/components/AddPeopleToTag/AddPeopleToTag.tsx (1)
Learnt from: meetulr PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2355 File: src/components/AddPeopleToTag/AddPeopleToTag.tsx:50-83 Timestamp: 2024-10-25T19:32:19.917Z Learning: The project currently does not have a GraphQL type generator, so manually typing the result of the `useQuery` hook is acceptable.
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/components/AddPeopleToTag/AddPeopleToTag.tsx (2)
1-36: LGTM! Well-structured imports and interfaces.The imports are properly organized, and the interfaces are well-documented with appropriate TypeScript types.
172-186: LGTM! Well-implemented error handling UI.The error state provides clear visual feedback with proper translations and icon usage.
public/locales/sp/translation.json (1)
335-342: LGTM! Spanish translations are accurate and well-formatted.The new translations for tag management functionality are linguistically correct, maintain consistency with Spanish UI conventions, and effectively convey the intended meaning to Spanish-speaking users.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/components/AddPeopleToTag/AddPeopleToTag.tsx (2)
32-36: Consider enhancing type safety for member data.The
InterfaceMemberDatainterface could be more specific about its field types and include optional fields that might be present in the GraphQL response.interface InterfaceMemberData { _id: string; - firstName: string; - lastName: string; + firstName: string | null; + lastName: string | null; + email?: string; + createdAt?: string; }
251-257: Enhance modal accessibility attributes.While the modal has basic accessibility attributes, it could benefit from additional ARIA attributes for better screen reader support.
<Modal show={addPeopleToTagModalIsOpen} onHide={hideAddPeopleToTagModal} backdrop="static" aria-labelledby="contained-modal-title-vcenter" + aria-describedby="modal-description" centered > + <div id="modal-description" className="sr-only"> + {t('modalDescription')} + </div>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- src/components/AddPeopleToTag/AddPeopleToTag.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
src/components/AddPeopleToTag/AddPeopleToTag.tsx (1)
Learnt from: meetulr PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2355 File: src/components/AddPeopleToTag/AddPeopleToTag.tsx:50-83 Timestamp: 2024-10-25T19:32:19.917Z Learning: The project currently does not have a GraphQL type generator, so manually typing the result of the `useQuery` hook is acceptable.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/utils/organizationTagsUtils.ts (2)
25-25: Add documentation for the query limit constant.Please add JSDoc comments explaining:
- The purpose of this limit
- Why 7 was chosen as the specific value
- Any performance or UX considerations
+/** + * Maximum number of users that can be queried/added to a tag in a single operation. + * This limit helps optimize performance and prevent excessive data loading. + * @todo Consider making this configurable based on system capabilities + */ export const ADD_PEOPLE_TO_TAGS_QUERY_LIMIT = 7;
25-25: Consider making the limit configurable.Since this limit affects the application's behavior and performance, consider:
- Making it an environment variable
- Moving it to a central configuration file
- Making it adjustable based on server capabilities
Example configuration approach:
// config/limits.ts export const QUERY_LIMITS = { ADD_PEOPLE_TO_TAGS: process.env.ADD_PEOPLE_TO_TAGS_LIMIT || 7, // other limits... } as const;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- src/components/AddPeopleToTag/AddPeopleToTag.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/utils/organizationTagsUtils.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/components/AddPeopleToTag/AddPeopleToTag.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/utils/organizationTagsUtils.ts (1)
25-25: Verify if the limit of 7 users is sufficient for typical use cases.The limit of 7 users per query seems relatively low and might require multiple operations for bulk tag assignments. Please verify:
- If this aligns with typical user needs
- Impact on UX when assigning tags to larger groups
- Any performance constraints that necessitate this specific limit
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more context about the usage of this limit by checking the implementation details.
Let me check one more aspect to understand if this limit is related to any backend constraints or pagination implementation.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide a final response:
The limit of 7 users appears to be a reasonable pagination parameter for this use case
The implementation shows this is used as a pagination limit for infinite scrolling in the AddPeopleToTag component, not a hard limit on the total number of users that can be tagged. The system:
- Uses infinite scroll to load more users as needed
- Follows similar pagination patterns seen elsewhere in the codebase
- Allows continuous loading of users in small batches, which is a common optimization pattern
The limit of 7 users per query is not a UX constraint but rather a performance optimization that:
- Ensures quick initial load times
- Reduces server load by fetching data in smaller chunks
- Maintains smooth scrolling experience
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for existing pagination limits in similar features # This will help understand if the limit is consistent with other parts of the application # Look for other pagination limits in the codebase echo "Searching for other pagination constants..." rg -i "limit|per_page|pageSize" --type ts # Look for GraphQL query parameters to understand typical batch sizes echo "Searching for GraphQL query parameters..." ast-grep --pattern 'query $_($limit: Int)'Length of output: 2480
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the implementation of AddPeopleToTag component and related code echo "Checking AddPeopleToTag component implementation..." rg -A 10 "ADD_PEOPLE_TO_TAGS_QUERY_LIMIT" # Check for any GraphQL mutations or queries related to adding people to tags echo "Checking GraphQL operations for adding people to tags..." ast-grep --pattern 'mutation $_($users: [ID!]!, $tagId: ID!) { $$$ }' # Look for any error messages or UI feedback related to this limit echo "Checking for related error messages..." rg -i "too many|limit exceeded|maximum.*users" --type tsLength of output: 3053
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for GraphQL query definitions and related pagination implementations echo "Checking GraphQL query definitions..." rg -A 10 "getUserTag" --type graphql --type ts # Look for any comments or documentation about the pagination implementation echo "Checking for documentation about pagination..." rg -i "pagination|per page|batch" --type ts --type md # Check the test files for any pagination-related test cases echo "Checking test files for pagination scenarios..." rg -A 5 "ADD_PEOPLE_TO_TAGS_QUERY_LIMIT" --type testLength of output: 7249
Thanks so much @beingnoble03🤗 |
|
@palisadoes please merge this so I can raise the next one. |
palisadoes
merged commit d9d7269
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Added functionality to add people to a tag.
Issue Number:
Fixes #2302
Did you add tests for your changes?
Yes
Snapshots/Videos:
add.people.to.tag.mp4
Additional Context:
Api issue: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#2552
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Style
AddPeopleToTagcomponent to improve user interface presentation.Tests
AddPeopleToTagcomponent to ensure functionality under various conditions.