-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 769
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update TS #2339
Update TS #2339
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request involves an update to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessWe have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team. Testing Your CodePlease make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if these conditions occur:
The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
package.json (1)
Line range hint
1-185
: Consider a broader dependency review and potential updates.While updating TypeScript is a good step, it might be beneficial to review and potentially update other dependencies as well. This could help prevent future conflicts and ensure you're using the latest features and security patches.
Here are some suggestions:
Review and potentially update React-related dependencies, especially if they have TypeScript typings that might benefit from the latest TypeScript version.
Check for any outdated or vulnerable dependencies using
npm audit
andnpm outdated
.Consider standardizing version constraints across dependencies for consistency and easier maintenance.
Review the resolutions section to see if the manual resolutions are still necessary with the updated TypeScript version.
You can use the following commands to assist with this review:
#!/bin/bash # Check for outdated packages npm outdated # Run security audit npm audit # List installed package versions npm lsAfter running these commands, assess if any other dependencies need updating alongside TypeScript.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.json
is excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- package.json (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
package.json (1)
61-61
: LGTM! TypeScript version updated as intended.The TypeScript version has been successfully updated from 5.6.2 to 5.6.3 as per the PR objectives. This minor version update is unlikely to introduce breaking changes.
To ensure this update resolves the previously failed tests and doesn't require any additional changes, please:
- Run the test suite to verify that the previously failing tests now pass.
- Check if any TypeScript configuration files (e.g.,
tsconfig.json
) need updates to align with the new version.You can use the following commands to verify:
If all tests pass and there are no TypeScript errors, this update should be good to go.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #2339 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 97.62% 97.62%
========================================
Files 250 250
Lines 7188 7188
Branches 2069 2069
========================================
Hits 7017 7017
Misses 159 159
Partials 12 12 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
7496bb3
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Upgrade version
Issue Number:
Fixes #2334
Did you add tests for your changes?
No
Snapshots/Videos:
None
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Summary
Upgraded typscript version from 5.6.2 to 5.6.3 in package.json file
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
None
Other information
Have you read the contributing guide?
Summary by CodeRabbit