Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix issue #2793 #2806

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Fix issue #2793 #2806

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

olyson
Copy link
Contributor

@olyson olyson commented Oct 2, 2024

Description of changes

Set eflx_building_lun to spval properly

Specific notes

Contributors other than yourself, if any: @cathyxinchangli

CTSM Issues Fixed (include github issue #): #2793

Are answers expected to change (and if so in what way)? No

Any User Interface Changes (namelist or namelist defaults changes)? No

Does this create a need to change or add documentation? Did you do so? No

Testing performed, if any:
Ran aux_clm.
Unexpected failures:

FAIL ERI_D.ne30pg3_t232.I1850Clm60BgcCropG.derecho_intel.clm-clm60cam7LndTuningModeLDust COMPARE_base_hybrid
FAIL ERI_D.ne30pg3_t232.I1850Clm60BgcCropG.derecho_intel.clm-clm60cam7LndTuningModeLDust COMPARE_base_rest

These failed because there was one variable not bfb, DPFCT_ROCK.
Unsure why that would be different.

Copy link
Contributor

@slevis-lmwg slevis-lmwg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@olyson I will approve preemptively, though I know that you're investigating a strange test-failure.

@@ -579,7 +579,7 @@ subroutine InitHistory(this, bounds, is_simple_buildtemp, is_prog_buildtemp)
avgflag='A', long_name='urban heating flux', &
ptr_col=this%eflx_urban_heat_col, set_nourb=0._r8, c2l_scale_type='urbanf')
else
this%eflx_urban_ac_lun(begl:endl) = spval
this%eflx_building_lun(begl:endl) = spval
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@slevis-lmwg slevis-lmwg added the bfb bit-for-bit label Oct 2, 2024
@olyson
Copy link
Contributor Author

olyson commented Oct 3, 2024

I tried that test above with ctsm5.3.002 and it passed as expected. I then ran it 3 times with my branch and all passed. So must have been some kind of glitch.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bfb bit-for-bit
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants