Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create LIT7081NamesGod #1222

Conversation

CarstenHoffmannMarburg
Copy link
Contributor

According to our discussion in BetaMasaheft/Documentation#2618.

If there is a decision about keywords for Magic (cf. discussions in BetaMasaheft/Documentation#2627 and in BetaMasaheft/Authority-Files#33), I would propose AsmatGod i.e. "Names of God" as keyword for this type of a Magic prayer (or rather a Christian text, that was used for Magic purpose).

@nafisa-valieva
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you! I have no objections!

Strelcyns reports some caracteristics on divine names used in Ethiopian, Old Egyptian and Muslim Arabic magic texts in general. I think, it is appropriate to mention the reference in the bibliography as secondary literature, even though this specific manuscript text is not mentioned.
@CarstenHoffmannMarburg CarstenHoffmannMarburg merged commit 2442ec8 into master Oct 14, 2024
1 check passed
@eu-genia eu-genia deleted the Magic-Prayer-by-the-virtue-of-the-names-of-God-in-BLorient11602_CH_oct24 branch October 16, 2024 07:34
@CarstenHoffmannMarburg
Copy link
Contributor Author

@eu-genia : Two weeks after merging, this file cannot be found in the app. What happened?

@eu-genia
Copy link
Contributor

eu-genia commented Nov 1, 2024

no idea, some bug during the record creation

again, an explanation: records should be visible online NOT from the moment of the merge (merge = synchronizing github and app) BUT from the moment they are created in the app (so BEFORE they are present on any branch or any pull request), so as soon as you create an ID you can access it online (but not on github or locally). so two minutes or two weeks after merging does not play a role.

should be there now

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants