Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

keywords for demons and diseases #33

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

keywords for demons and diseases #33

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

eu-genia
Copy link
Contributor

<profileDesc>
<creation/>
<abstract>
<p>A cause of disease, frequently target of <term key="Magic">magic prayers</term>; see also <persName ref="ETH1219baryas"></persName>.</p>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not

Demonic entities? there is a social group, the 'slaves' and there is a deamon, no? @DenisNosnitsin1970 @karljonaskarlsson

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would suggest changing it to 'A cause of disease or a demon, often ...'. As I understand it, the Bāryā is often personalised in the form of a demon, as can be seen from its attributes such as Bāryā ṣallim, i.e. "black Bāryā". This could be included in the term "cause", but I think it is useful to be more specific and define it as a demon in this case. The problem that the term has a historical development, as is the case with many magic names and terms, can be dealt with later, after consulting the relevant literature.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think Nafisa's observation is correct: ETH1219baryas seems to refer to an ethnic group and not to a type of demons. It is used for a group of military units in Amda Seyon's chronicle, for example

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ETH1219baryas is a social group, the ID is not used for the military unit, see now also BetaMasaheft/Persons#914

Copy link
Contributor

@nafisa-valieva nafisa-valieva left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

May be it can be good to add also Ethiopic terms for all English terms you created?

@eu-genia
Copy link
Contributor Author

May be it can be good to add also Ethiopic terms for all English terms you created?

At the moment what I created are keywords. If we want expanded records with more names, bibliographies etc, it may be then necessary to create Authority files as we do e.g. for Art themes, I am not sure

<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>ʾaqʷǝyāṣāt</title>

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we keep ʾaqʷǝyāṣāt, we should write ʾAqʷǝyāṣāt with a capital first letter as with the other keywords.

<profileDesc>
<creation/>
<abstract>
<p><term key="demon">Demonic entities</term> cause of disease - frequently target of <term key="Magic">magic prayers</term>. </p>

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ʾaqʷǝyāṣāt is Plural from qʷǝyṣ "shinbone". I think the idea is, that persons or mule on risky pathways should not be harmed by getting struck by their shinbones, e.g. shall not have accidents on their ways. I think it is more a metaphor for going safe and sound and not so much a demonic entity, magic agent or something, that justifies the creation of a keyword for it.

<profileDesc>
<creation/>
<abstract>
<p>As a cause of disease - frequently target of <term key="Magic">magic prayers</term>. Similar to <term key="EvilEye"></term>; see also <persName ref="ETH1310Buda"></persName></p>

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I suggest: "As a cause of disease or misfortune - ..."

<profileDesc>
<creation/>
<abstract>
<p>As a disease - frequently target of <term key="Magic">magic prayers</term>. </p>

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think these prayers are all about women's menstruation. So we can say: "Female menstruation and menstrual cramps perceived as a disease - ..."

<profileDesc>
<creation/>
<abstract>
<p>As a disease - frequently target of <term key="Magic">magic prayers</term>. </p>

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have not noticed that it is used that often, but I have no problem with a new keyword.

<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Drowning Demons</title>

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would prefer "masṭǝma gānen"/"Masṭǝma gānen".

<profileDesc>
<creation/>
<abstract>
<p>As a cause of disease - frequently target of <term key="Magic">magic prayers</term>. See also <persName ref="ETH1274Betaes"></persName></p>

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"As a cause of disease or misfortune - ..."

<profileDesc>
<creation/>
<abstract>
<p>Fever of undefined origin, frequently target of <term key="Magic">magic prayers</term>.</p>

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think there should be a distinction between ferā (everything that is contagious) and nǝdad (everything that goes with higher temperature). I think in this case we are talking about nǝdad. Ferā might be another keyword, although I think it is less frequent.

<profileDesc>
<creation/>
<abstract>
<p>A <term key="demon">demon</term> cause of disease - frequently target of <term key="Magic">magic prayers</term>. </p>

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A second form is gʷǝdāle. It may be related to gadala 'to kill', but it is probably better to refrain from a literal explanation for now.

<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Malaria</title>

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we accept that ferā is always or often malaria, we can use this term. I wonder if it is possible to identify diseases accurately in ancient texts.

@CarstenHoffmannMarburg
Copy link

I am wondering, why I see the message 'All checks have failed' shortly after I have given my review?

Screenshot 2024_All checks have failed

@eu-genia
Copy link
Contributor Author

no need to wonder, it is because the files do not validate as long as the schema has not been updated to include the new keywords already used in the records
if you click on the error report behind the link (the one preceded by the red cross) you can always see what does not validate

<profileDesc>
<creation/>
<abstract>
<p>A cause of disease, frequently target of <term key="Magic">magic prayers</term>; see also <persName ref="ETH1219baryas"></persName>.</p>

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think Nafisa's observation is correct: ETH1219baryas seems to refer to an ethnic group and not to a type of demons. It is used for a group of military units in Amda Seyon's chronicle, for example

<profileDesc>
<creation/>
<abstract>
<p>As a cause of disease - frequently target of <term key="Magic">magic prayers</term>. Similar to <term key="EvilEye"></term>; see also <persName ref="ETH1310Buda"></persName></p>

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it a principle to encode types of demons as ethnic groups?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ETH1310Buda is not a demon, it is a term used traditionly for the social group, just like Barya

@CarstenHoffmannMarburg
Copy link

At the moment what I created are keywords. If we want expanded records with more names, bibliographies etc, it may be then necessary to create Authority files as we do e.g. for Art themes, I am not sure

In my opinion, more information could be added now or later. This would be very useful as many names or terms are ambiguous and need explanation. This can be done in the summary of the files you have created for the keywords. But it might be more visible and practical if each of them, or at least some of them, also got authority files. I think this is more practical because demons, diseases, etc. can also appear in other texts (e.g. chronologies). It could be easily marked up with ref type="authFile", but also with PRS IDs for demons or wizards.

@eu-genia
Copy link
Contributor Author

On looking at the list of suggestions BetaMasaheft/Documentation#2627 I think we must for now try to keep the list of keywords to a sensible and manageable minimum, or noone will be able to find anything.

I will give it some more thoughts

@eu-genia
Copy link
Contributor Author

(we cannot create PRS IDs for anything other than persons or groups of persons; demons are not persons)

@CarstenHoffmannMarburg
Copy link

(we cannot create PRS IDs for anything other than persons or groups of persons; demons are not persons)

Except for the Devil himself (PRS11330Devil) and Angels (like PRS13936Kirubel).

@eu-genia
Copy link
Contributor Author

(we cannot create PRS IDs for anything other than persons or groups of persons; demons are not persons)

Except for the Devil himself (PRS11330Devil) and Angels (like PRS13936Kirubel).

Devil=Lucifer=Satan as THE personification is OK, but PRS13936Kirubel is not a person but an angel category and should be removed from persons, it was created by @GueshSol who probably was not aware of the rule.

@CarstenHoffmannMarburg
Copy link

Devil=Lucifer=Satan as THE personification is OK, but PRS13936Kirubel is not a person but an angel category and should be removed from persons, it was created by @GueshSol who probably was not aware of the rule.

We also have Raphael/Rufaʾel in PRS8083Raphael.

@CarstenHoffmannMarburg
Copy link

Devil=Lucifer=Satan as THE personification is OK, but PRS13936Kirubel is not a person but an angel category and should be removed from persons, it was created by @GueshSol who probably was not aware of the rule.

We also have Raphael/Rufaʾel in PRS8083Raphael.

PRS7840Phanuel
PRS7049Michael
PRS9684Uriel
PRS4377Gabriel

@CarstenHoffmannMarburg
Copy link

Devil=Lucifer=Satan as THE personification is OK, but PRS13936Kirubel is not a person but an angel category and should be removed from persons, it was created by @GueshSol who probably was not aware of the rule.

We also have Raphael/Rufaʾel in PRS8083Raphael.

PRS7840Phanuel PRS7049Michael PRS9684Uriel PRS4377Gabriel

PRS9036Suriel
PRS8065Raguel

@eu-genia
Copy link
Contributor Author

Raphael, Suriel, Michael, Gabriel are personified.
Cherubs and seraphs are just angel ranks.

@GueshSol
Copy link
Contributor

@eu-genia What I created is the name of a person who owns a certain manuscript I am not referring an angel in my context (see the snapshot image from MS Art institute of Chicago for you reference attached here). If the name of the person is Kirubel though the name originally related to an angel, what is wrong if we create an ID for a person named Kirubel as we have additional person names of Surafel, Mikael, and the like? I don't see any lack of awareness in this regard.
Kirubel

@eu-genia
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you! Then all is good, I did not check attestations, only reacted to what was written in the issue! Owners are of course persons!
(for the future - having a PRS cherub is just like having a PRS angel or a PRS spirit - these are not persons but types of entities, should not have PRS records. Archangels with proper names are of course OK).

@eu-genia
Copy link
Contributor Author

It is important to remember that the whole taxonomy (ALL keywords, whether those in the record or not, the whole file) is inserted into each XML record when it is expanded to be displayed, so we should try to keep the taxonomy compact (or find another solution for the future). Every added line increases the size of each and every XML record in the system. While each line is not a lot, when you reproduce it 100 000 times it does take storage space.

I think it is OK to create separate PRS records for "personified" demons (such as Werzelya) etc.

We already have demon among the keywords, that can always be used together with the generic Magic / MagicText / MagicFormula keywords, and we also have Asmat (we can specify there that it also covers qālāt).

I think we could add the following to the taxonomy

Magic and spells

  • Subtypes (on top of existing MagicText MagicFormula Asmat)

    • --MagicDrawing (for all sorts not covered yet)
    • --MagicSymbols (for magical letters and such)
  • Targets of spells 1: Diseases

    • --Disease (any disease)
    • --DiseaseFever (any disease with fever, incl malaria)
    • --DiseasePain (any disease with pain, colic, headache, heartache)
    • --DiseaseMental (any neurological or mental disease, epilepsy/fits, madness)
    • --DiseaseWomen (infertility, menstruation, etc)
  • Targets of spells 2: Evil influence, in addition to demon (keyword) Satan (PRS11330Devil) and other personifiable demons

    • --EvilEye
    • --EvilSpirit (generic for all others, if needed, one can create sub-IDs, as we do for text chapters, under EvilSpirit.xml and then one could, if necessary, point to EvilSpirit#Barya, EvilSpirit#Buda etc.

Originally posted by @eu-genia in BetaMasaheft/Documentation#2627 (comment)

One could also imagine creating Narrative units for some frequent topoi

Copy link
Contributor

@nafisa-valieva nafisa-valieva left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you! Looks good for me!

<desc>Demonic entities</desc>
<category xml:id="EvilEye"
corresp="https://betamasaheft.eu/authority-files/EvilEye/main">
<catDesc>Evil Eye</catDesc>

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here it is probably useful to add some explanations, especially whether ʾaynat and budā shall be represented by EvilEye or not. To my understanding, both terms may fit to this category, but are quiet ambivalent in their meaning (Cf. BetaMasaheft/Documentation#2592).

</category>
<category xml:id="MagicSymbols"
corresp="https://betamasaheft.eu/authority-files/MagicSymbols/main">
<catDesc>Magic symbols or letters (see also Asmat for ʾAsmāt or Secret

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Probably it is useful to add also Qālāt as a term, that was used by Strelcyn.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@eu-genia eu-genia Dec 2, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Probably it is useful to add also Qālāt as a term, that was used by Strelcyn.

see above

We already have demon among the keywords, that can always be used together with the generic Magic / MagicText / MagicFormula keywords, and we also have Asmat (we can specify there that it also covers qālāt).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants