Add the correct evaluation content in the cs101F2019_lab09.

lab09/cs101F2019_lab09.tex

@@ -259,6 +259,15 @@ \section*{Understanding, Implementing, and Testing an \tt{ArrayList}}
 methods for equivalence testing (i.e., \program{equals}) and data replacement
 (i.e., \program{set}).
 
+\begin{verbatim}
+  public E set(int index, E element) throws IndexOutOfBoundsException {
+    checkIndex(index, size);
+    E temp = data[index];
+    data[index] = element;
+    return temp;
+  }
+\end{verbatim}
+
   \begin{figure}[t]
     \centering
     \begin{verbatim}
@@ -279,7 +288,6 @@ \section*{Understanding, Implementing, and Testing an \tt{ArrayList}}
   \vspace*{-.25in}
 \end{figure}
 
-
 Remember, if you want to \step{build} your program you can type the command
 \gradlebuild{} in your terminal, thereby causing the Java compiler to check your
 program for errors and get it ready to run. If you notice that some of the test
@@ -379,12 +387,12 @@ \section*{Evaluation of Your Laboratory Assignment}
 the whether or not it was submitted in a timely fashion and if your program
 received a green \checkmark{} indicating that it met all of the requirements.
 Other factors will also influence your final grade on the assignment. In
-addition to studying the efficiency and effectiveness of your Java source code,
-the instructor will also evaluate the accuracy of both your technical writing
-and the comments in your source code. If your submission receives a red
-\naughtmark{}, the instructor will reduce your grade for the assignment while
-still considering the regularity with which you committed to your repository and
-the overall quality of your partially completed work.
+addition to studying the efficiency and effectiveness and documentation of your
+Java source code, the instructor will also evaluate the correctness of your
+technical writing. If your submission receives a red \naughtmark{}, the
+instructor will reduce your grade for the assignment. Finally, please remember
+to read your GitHub repository's \program{README.md} file for a description of
+the four grades that you will receive for this laboratory assignment.
 
 % Had to cut this content due to space constraints
 
@@ -393,11 +401,15 @@ \section*{Evaluation of Your Laboratory Assignment}
 
 % \section*{Adhering to the Honor Code}
 
-% In adherence to the Honor Code, students should complete this assignment on an individual basis. While it is appropriate
-% for students in this class to have high-level conversations about the assignment, it is necessary to distinguish
-% carefully between the student who discusses the principles underlying a problem with others and the student who produces
-% assignments that are identical to, or merely variations on, someone else's work. Deliverables (e.g., Java source code or
-% Markdown-based technical writing) that are nearly identical to the work of others will be taken as evidence of violating
-% the \mbox{Honor Code}. Please see the course instructor if you have questions about this policy.
+% In adherence to the Honor Code, students should complete this assignment on an
+% individual basis. While it is appropriate for students in this class to have
+% high-level conversations about the assignment, it is necessary to distinguish
+% carefully between the student who discusses the principles underlying a
+% problem with others and the student who produces assignments that are
+% identical to, or merely variations on, someone else's work. Deliverables
+% (e.g., Java source code or Markdown-based technical writing) that are nearly
+% identical to the work of others will be taken as evidence of violating the
+% \mbox{Honor Code}. Please see the course instructor if you have questions
+% about this policy.
 
 \end{document}