Fix the evaluation paragraph in the cs101F2019_lab08.

lab08/cs101F2019_lab08.tex

@@ -457,22 +457,24 @@ \section*{Evaluation of Your Laboratory Assignment}
 the whether or not it was submitted in a timely fashion and if your program
 received a green \checkmark{} indicating that it met all of the requirements.
 Other factors will also influence your final grade on the assignment. In
-addition to studying the efficiency and effectiveness of your Java source code,
-the instructor will also evaluate the accuracy of both your technical writing
-and the comments in your source code. If your submission receives a red
-\naughtmark{}, the instructor will reduce your grade for the assignment while
-still considering the regularity with which you committed to your GitHub
-repository and the overall quality of your partially completed work. Please see
-the instructor if you have questions about the evaluation of this laboratory
-assignment.
+addition to studying the efficiency and effectiveness and documentation of your
+Java source code, the instructor will also evaluate the correctness of your
+technical writing. If your submission receives a red \naughtmark{}, the
+instructor will reduce your grade for the assignment. Finally, please remember
+to read your GitHub repository's \program{README.md} file for a description of
+the four grades that you will receive for this laboratory assignment.
 
 % \section*{Adhering to the Honor Code}
 
-% In adherence to the Honor Code, students should complete this assignment on an individual basis. While it is appropriate
-% for students in this class to have high-level conversations about the assignment, it is necessary to distinguish
-% carefully between the student who discusses the principles underlying a problem with others and the student who produces
-% assignments that are identical to, or merely variations on, someone else's work. Deliverables (e.g., Java source code or
-% Markdown-based technical writing) that are nearly identical to the work of others will be taken as evidence of violating
-% the \mbox{Honor Code}. Please see the course instructor if you have questions about this policy.
+% In adherence to the Honor Code, students should complete this assignment on
+% an individual basis. While it is appropriate for students in this class to
+% have high-level conversations about the assignment, it is necessary to
+% distinguish carefully between the student who discusses the principles
+% underlying a problem with others and the student who produces assignments
+% that are identical to, or merely variations on, someone else's work.
+% Deliverables (e.g., Java source code or Markdown-based technical writing)
+% that are nearly identical to the work of others will be taken as evidence of
+% violating the \mbox{Honor Code}. Please see the course instructor if you have
+% questions about this policy.
 
 \end{document}