-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 75
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Group-Search function #75
Comments
Is that example supposed to search for values equal to 100 or 200 or 300? It's not currently possible but it would be do-able to add the appropriate comparison functions plus extracting the list of numbers. This is the first time this has been brought up. Currently you can work around this by having multiple search windows and running separate sessions.. I imagine constraints would be:
Not likely to look into this soon. |
If on the other hand, what you actually want is a byte array search (with values 100 followed by 200 followed by 300 in consecutive order) then you can use the byte array search, but you will have to encode it in hexadecimal. |
Ah I see, this is more the latter. Game Guardian allows there being a maximum defined gap between the numbers and possibly doesn't enforce them to be in-order. That is more complicated. Not currently possible. If you know the order and there's no gap you can use byte array search. I would probably just search for a single value and look in the memory viewer, debugger, or do more searches. |
Is there a way to search a group? Like for example the values 100;200;300 (like in GameGuardian).
If not, this would be a nice addition.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: