Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

merge dev to main (v2.7.1) #1789

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 19, 2024
Merged

merge dev to main (v2.7.1) #1789

merged 4 commits into from
Oct 19, 2024

Conversation

ymc9
Copy link
Member

@ymc9 ymc9 commented Oct 19, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 19, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the changelog and the version number for the JetBrains plugin project. The changelog now includes a new entry for fixed issues related to ZModel validation when importing zmodel files from npm packages, along with a summary of previous updates addressing similar validation issues. Additionally, the version number in the build.gradle.kts file is incremented from 2.7.0 to 2.7.1, with no other changes made to the build configuration.

Changes

File Change Summary
packages/ide/jetbrains/CHANGELOG.md Updated to include new entry for ZModel validation fixes and previous updates related to ZModel.
packages/ide/jetbrains/build.gradle.kts Version number updated from 2.7.0 to 2.7.1. No other changes made to the build configuration.

Possibly related PRs


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

‼️ IMPORTANT
Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository in the CodeRabbit settings. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
packages/ide/jetbrains/CHANGELOG.md (2)

Line range hint 1-8: Update changelog structure and version number

The changelog currently lists the new fix under the "Unreleased" section. However, the PR title suggests this is for version 2.7.1. Consider the following changes:

  1. Replace "Unreleased" with the correct version number (2.7.1).
  2. Add a release date for version 2.7.1.
  3. Move the previous versions (2.6.0 and earlier) under a "Previous Releases" section for better organization.

Here's a suggested structure:

# Changelog

## 2.7.1 - [Release Date]

### Fixed

- ZModel validation issues importing zmodel files from npm packages.

## Previous Releases

### 2.6.0

...

This structure will better reflect the version mentioned in the PR title and improve the overall organization of the changelog.


7-7: Consider adding more details about the fix

The current description of the fix is concise, which is good. However, given that this is similar to a fix in version 2.6.0, it might be beneficial to provide more context or details. This could help users understand the specific nature of the fix and how it differs from or builds upon the previous fix.

Consider expanding the description to include:

  1. The specific symptoms or errors users might have encountered.
  2. Any particular npm packages or scenarios where this issue was most prevalent.
  3. How this fix relates to or differs from the similar fix in version 2.6.0.

For example:

- Fixed ZModel validation issues when importing zmodel files from npm packages. This addresses [specific error or symptom], particularly when [specific scenario]. This builds upon the fix in 2.6.0 by extending validation support to [specific aspect].
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between cef0e8f and c39f596.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (13)
  • package.json is excluded by !**/*.json
  • packages/ide/jetbrains/package.json is excluded by !**/*.json
  • packages/language/package.json is excluded by !**/*.json
  • packages/misc/redwood/package.json is excluded by !**/*.json
  • packages/plugins/openapi/package.json is excluded by !**/*.json
  • packages/plugins/swr/package.json is excluded by !**/*.json
  • packages/plugins/tanstack-query/package.json is excluded by !**/*.json
  • packages/plugins/trpc/package.json is excluded by !**/*.json
  • packages/runtime/package.json is excluded by !**/*.json
  • packages/schema/package.json is excluded by !**/*.json
  • packages/sdk/package.json is excluded by !**/*.json
  • packages/server/package.json is excluded by !**/*.json
  • packages/testtools/package.json is excluded by !**/*.json
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • packages/ide/jetbrains/CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • packages/ide/jetbrains/build.gradle.kts (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • packages/ide/jetbrains/build.gradle.kts
🧰 Additional context used

@ymc9 ymc9 merged commit 5db1a2c into main Oct 19, 2024
16 checks passed
This was referenced Oct 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant