Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(delegate): concrete model fields are not properly included if queried from a nested context from a parent concrete model #1700

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 15, 2024

Conversation

ymc9
Copy link
Member

@ymc9 ymc9 commented Sep 15, 2024

Fixes #1698

…ried from a nested context from a parent concrete model

Fixes #1968
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 15, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request focus on enhancing the DelegateProxyHandler class, specifically improving how field values are handled during the injection process. Key modifications include the refactoring of method names and the introduction of new test cases to validate the functionality of hierarchical merging in polymorphic relationships. Additionally, a regression test has been added to ensure that delegation functionality works correctly for a schema involving houses and doors.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
packages/runtime/src/enhancements/node/delegate.ts Enhanced DelegateProxyHandler to refetch field values from args, updated comments, and renamed methods for clarity.
tests/integration/tests/enhancements/with-delegate/enhanced-client.test.ts Added a test case for merging hierarchies in a polymorphic schema with delegation.
tests/regression/tests/issue-1698.test.ts Introduced a regression test for a schema involving houses and doors to verify delegation functionality.

Possibly related PRs


Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 61b32cb and ab261ae.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • packages/runtime/src/enhancements/node/delegate.ts (3 hunks)
  • tests/integration/tests/enhancements/with-delegate/enhanced-client.test.ts (1 hunks)
  • tests/regression/tests/issue-1698.test.ts (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (6)
tests/regression/tests/issue-1698.test.ts (1)

3-73: LGTM!

The regression test case is well-structured and provides good coverage for the reported issue. It sets up the necessary schema, creates relevant instances, and verifies the delegation functionality through appropriate assertions.

The test case follows a logical flow and covers the essential aspects of the problem. The assertions ensure that the door properties are correctly linked to the respective house types, confirming that the delegation functionality is working as intended.

Great job on adding this regression test!

packages/runtime/src/enhancements/node/delegate.ts (4)

171-173: LGTM!

Refetching the field select/include value from the args object ensures that it reflects any updates made during injection. This change improves the accuracy of the injectWhereHierarchy and injectBaseFieldSelect methods.


178-178: LGTM!

Injecting the orderBy property into the fieldValue object ensures that it is correctly processed by the injectWhereHierarchy method. This change improves the accuracy of the method when handling fields from base types.


181-184: LGTM!

Replacing true with an empty object ensures that the injectSelectIncludeHierarchy method can correctly process the payload. This change improves the robustness of the method when handling different types of payloads.


1165-1169: LGTM!

The updated comments and method names improve the clarity and readability of the codebase:

  • The term "fully merge" clarifies the intent behind merging base fields and sub-model fields, indicating a more comprehensive integration.
  • The method name assembleHierarchy suggests a more structured approach to handling hierarchical data relationships.

These changes enhance the maintainability of the codebase by making the code more self-explanatory.

Also applies to: 1216-1223

tests/integration/tests/enhancements/with-delegate/enhanced-client.test.ts (1)

1365-1409: LGTM!

The test case is well-structured and effectively validates the merging of hierarchies in a schema that utilizes delegation. It covers the following key aspects:

  • Defining a schema with polymorphic relationships using delegation.
  • Creating test data by instantiating related entities.
  • Executing queries to retrieve entities along with their delegated relationships.
  • Verifying the correctness of the query results.

The test case enhances the robustness of the codebase by ensuring that the delegation mechanism functions as expected when dealing with polymorphic relationships.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

‼️ IMPORTANT
Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository in the CodeRabbit settings. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant