-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 90
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: issues with cross-model comparison identification and injection #1508
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe updates include minor version increment for the JetBrains IDE plugin, refactoring of policy traversal logic in Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/runtime/src/enhancements/policy/policy-utils.ts (1)
Line range hint
523-523
: Consider replacingdelete
withundefined
assignment for performance.- delete entityData[field]; + entityData[field] = undefined;Using
delete
can potentially degrade performance by causing deoptimizations in JavaScript engines like V8. It's generally more performant to set properties toundefined
if they are not required later, as this avoids changing the underlying structure of the object.Also applies to: 1108-1108
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (13)
package.json
is excluded by!**/*.json
packages/ide/jetbrains/package.json
is excluded by!**/*.json
packages/language/package.json
is excluded by!**/*.json
packages/misc/redwood/package.json
is excluded by!**/*.json
packages/plugins/openapi/package.json
is excluded by!**/*.json
packages/plugins/swr/package.json
is excluded by!**/*.json
packages/plugins/tanstack-query/package.json
is excluded by!**/*.json
packages/plugins/trpc/package.json
is excluded by!**/*.json
packages/runtime/package.json
is excluded by!**/*.json
packages/schema/package.json
is excluded by!**/*.json
packages/sdk/package.json
is excluded by!**/*.json
packages/server/package.json
is excluded by!**/*.json
packages/testtools/package.json
is excluded by!**/*.json
Files selected for processing (6)
- packages/ide/jetbrains/build.gradle.kts (1 hunks)
- packages/runtime/src/enhancements/policy/policy-utils.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/schema/src/plugins/enhancer/policy/policy-guard-generator.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/schema/src/plugins/enhancer/policy/utils.ts (2 hunks)
- tests/regression/tests/issue-1506.test.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/regression/tests/issue-1507.test.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- packages/ide/jetbrains/build.gradle.kts
Additional context used
Biome
packages/schema/src/plugins/enhancer/policy/utils.ts
[error] 107-111: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 194-196: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 197-199: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 200-221: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 207-211: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 212-221: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
[error] 215-221: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
[error] 281-283: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
packages/schema/src/plugins/enhancer/policy/policy-guard-generator.ts
[error] 653-655: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
packages/runtime/src/enhancements/policy/policy-utils.ts
[error] 65-69: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 67-69: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
[error] 79-83: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 81-83: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
[error] 92-96: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 94-96: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
[error] 105-110: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 116-118: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 378-380: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 416-426: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 523-523: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance. (lint/performance/noDelete)
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
[error] 867-869: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 1108-1108: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance. (lint/performance/noDelete)
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
[error] 1248-1250: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 1440-1445: This function expression can be turned into an arrow function. (lint/complexity/useArrowFunction)
Function expressions that don't use this can be turned into arrow functions.
Safe fix: Use an arrow function instead.
Additional comments not posted (9)
tests/regression/tests/issue-1507.test.ts (3)
1-1
: Ensure theloadSchema
function is correctly imported and utilized.
6-16
: The model definitions and authorization setup look correct and align with the requirements of issue #1507.
21-25
: The data creation and assertions are appropriate for testing the authorization rules specified in the modelProfile
. However, ensure that the test covers all necessary scenarios.tests/regression/tests/issue-1506.test.ts (3)
1-1
: Ensure theloadSchema
function is correctly imported and utilized.
6-31
: The model definitions and relationships are set up correctly to simulate the conditions described in issue #1506.
36-55
: The data creation and assertions seem to properly test the cross-model field comparisons. However, verify that the test accurately reflects the intended behavior and catches potential issues.Verification successful
The test case in
tests/regression/tests/issue-1506.test.ts
accurately reflects the intended behavior and includes appropriate assertions to catch potential issues. The data creation and subsequent assertions verify that the cross-model field comparisons are functioning correctly.
- The test sets up a schema with models A, B, and C.
- It creates an instance of model A, which is related to model B, and model B is related to model C.
- The test then reads from the database and verifies that the relationships are correctly established.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the test accurately reflects the intended behavior. # Test: Check for additional test cases and assertions in the file. rg --type typescript 'it(' 'tests/regression/tests/issue-1506.test.ts'Length of output: 127
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the test accurately reflects the intended behavior. # Test: Check for additional test cases and assertions in the file. rg --type typescript 'it\(' 'tests/regression/tests/issue-1506.test.ts'Length of output: 106
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the test accurately reflects the intended behavior. # Test: Check for additional test cases and assertions in the file. rg 'it\(' 'tests/regression/tests/issue-1506.test.ts'Length of output: 88
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the content of the regression test case for review. # Extract the content of the test case rg -A 20 'it\(' 'tests/regression/tests/issue-1506.test.ts'Length of output: 693
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the full content of the regression test case for review. # Extract the content of the test case with more lines rg -A 50 'it\(' 'tests/regression/tests/issue-1506.test.ts'Length of output: 1454
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the full content of the regression test case for review. # Extract the content of the test case with even more lines rg -A 100 'it\(' 'tests/regression/tests/issue-1506.test.ts'Length of output: 1545
packages/schema/src/plugins/enhancer/policy/utils.ts (1)
486-490
: The handling ofauth()
invocation ingetSourceModelOfFieldAccess
is essential for correct cross-model comparison. This change appears to address a specific case mentioned in the PR description.packages/runtime/src/enhancements/policy/policy-utils.ts (2)
1077-1087
: Optimized object checking ininjectReadCheckSelect
method.The refactoring in the
injectReadCheckSelect
method, which now iterates over keys ofvisitTarget
and checks if the field is a data model, is a good improvement. It simplifies the logic and makes it more readable by ensuringvisitTarget[key]
is an object before proceeding with recursive injection.
Line range hint
65-69
: Consider removing unnecessary else clauses.
[REFACTOR_SUGGESTion]- else { + {The static analysis tool has flagged several unnecessary
else
clauses followingreturn
statements. Removing these can simplify the code and reduce unnecessary nesting, making the logic clearer and more straightforward.Also applies to: 67-69, 79-83, 81-83, 92-96, 94-96, 105-110, 116-118, 378-380, 416-426, 867-869, 1248-1250
Fixes #1506 #1507