fix: additional fixes and tests related to cross-model field comparison #1496
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe recent updates enhance the logic for determining the source model of a field access in a TypeScript plugin and expand test coverage for authentication scenarios. Specifically, the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant TestSuite
participant SchemaPlugin
User ->> TestSuite: Run tests
TestSuite ->> SchemaPlugin: Test 'with auth case 1'
SchemaPlugin ->> TestSuite: Return results for case 1
TestSuite ->> SchemaPlugin: Test 'with auth case 2'
SchemaPlugin ->> TestSuite: Return results for case 2
TestSuite ->> SchemaPlugin: Test 'with auth case 3'
SchemaPlugin ->> TestSuite: Return results for case 3
TestSuite ->> User: Display test results
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
packages/schema/src/plugins/enhancer/policy/utils.ts (2)
Line range hint
107-111: Consider simplifying the control flow by removing unnecessary else clauses.- else { - return hasFutureRef ? [] : expressions; - } + return hasFutureRef ? [] : expressions;This change is based on the static analysis hint and will make the code cleaner and more straightforward.
Line range hint
119-119: Avoid usinganytype for better type safety.Consider specifying a more explicit type than
anyfor better type safety and to leverage TypeScript's type checking capabilities.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- packages/schema/src/plugins/enhancer/policy/utils.ts (2 hunks)
- tests/integration/tests/enhancements/with-policy/cross-model-field-comparison.test.ts (3 hunks)
Additional context used
Biome
packages/schema/src/plugins/enhancer/policy/utils.ts
[error] 107-111: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 119-119: Unexpected any. Specify a different type. (lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
[error] 194-196: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 197-199: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 200-221: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 207-211: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 212-221: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
[error] 215-221: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
[error] 281-283: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
Additional comments not posted (3)
packages/schema/src/plugins/enhancer/policy/utils.ts (2)
Line range hint
486-502: Refined logic for determining the source model of a field access.The addition of
isMemberAccessExpr(expr.$container)alongsideisDataModel(expr.$resolvedType?.decl)enhances the accuracy of model determination. Good job on clarifying the comments as well, which improves maintainability.
Line range hint
194-221: Multiple unnecessary else clauses detected.
[REFACTOR_Suggestion]
Consider simplifying the control flow by removing these clauses, as they are redundant after return statements in previous blocks.tests/integration/tests/enhancements/with-policy/cross-model-field-comparison.test.ts (1)
Line range hint
772-806: Renamed test case and added new test cases for enhanced coverage.The renaming of the test case to 'with auth case 1' and the addition of new test cases 'with auth case 2' and 'with auth case 3' are well-implemented. These changes improve the organization and clarity of the test scenarios.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- tests/integration/tests/enhancements/with-policy/cross-model-field-comparison.test.ts (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- tests/integration/tests/enhancements/with-policy/cross-model-field-comparison.test.ts
No description provided.