merge dev to main (v2.1.0) #1438
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe update encompasses enhancements across various packages, focusing on improving type handling, adding functionalities like Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 10
Out of diff range and nitpick comments (4)
packages/runtime/src/enhancements/policy/policy-utils.ts (4)
20-25: Consider using explicit imports instead of wildcard imports for better type safety and easier refactoring.
Line range hint
31-45: Ensure robustness by defining a type foroptionsto prevent runtime errors due to incorrect property accesses.
Line range hint
47-135: Optimize logical operations by reducing unnecessary checks and simplifying conditions.- const filtered = conditions.filter((c) => c !== undefined); - if (filtered.length === 0) { + if (conditions.every(c => c === undefined)) { return this.makeTrue(); - } else if (filtered.length === 1) { + } else if (conditions.filter(c => c !== undefined).length === 1) { return this.reduce(filtered[0]); - } else { + } else { return this.reduce({ AND: conditions.filter(c => c !== undefined) }); }
Line range hint
231-270: Enhance error messages in guard loading methods to include more context for easier debugging.- throw this.unknownError(`unable to load policy guard for ${model}`); + throw this.unknownError(`Unable to load policy guard for model: ${model}. Check configuration.`);
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (21)
package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.jsonpackages/ide/jetbrains/package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.jsonpackages/language/package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.jsonpackages/language/src/generated/ast.tsis excluded by!**/generated/**packages/language/src/generated/grammar.tsis excluded by!**/generated/**packages/misc/redwood/package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.jsonpackages/plugins/openapi/package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.jsonpackages/plugins/swr/package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.jsonpackages/plugins/tanstack-query/package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.jsonpackages/plugins/trpc/package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.jsonpackages/plugins/trpc/tests/projects/t3-trpc-v10/src/server/api/routers/generated/routers/Post.router.tsis excluded by!**/generated/**packages/plugins/trpc/tests/projects/t3-trpc-v10/src/server/api/routers/generated/routers/User.router.tsis excluded by!**/generated/**packages/plugins/trpc/tests/projects/t3-trpc-v10/src/server/api/routers/generated/routers/index.tsis excluded by!**/generated/**packages/runtime/package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.jsonpackages/schema/package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.jsonpackages/sdk/package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.jsonpackages/server/package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.jsonpackages/testtools/package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.jsonpnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!pnpm-lock.yaml,!**/*.yamltests/integration/tsconfig.jsonis excluded by!**/*.jsontests/regression/tsconfig.jsonis excluded by!**/*.json
Files selected for processing (53)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- packages/ide/jetbrains/build.gradle.kts (1 hunks)
- packages/language/src/zmodel.langium (2 hunks)
- packages/plugins/openapi/src/rpc-generator.ts (4 hunks)
- packages/plugins/swr/src/generator.ts (5 hunks)
- packages/plugins/tanstack-query/src/generator.ts (5 hunks)
- packages/plugins/trpc/src/generator.ts (6 hunks)
- packages/plugins/trpc/src/helpers.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/runtime/src/enhance.d.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/runtime/src/enhancements/delegate.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/runtime/src/enhancements/policy/constraint-solver.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/runtime/src/enhancements/policy/handler.ts (4 hunks)
- packages/runtime/src/enhancements/policy/logic-solver.d.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/runtime/src/enhancements/policy/policy-utils.ts (7 hunks)
- packages/runtime/src/enhancements/types.ts (3 hunks)
- packages/runtime/src/types.ts (3 hunks)
- packages/schema/src/cli/cli-util.ts (3 hunks)
- packages/schema/src/language-server/utils.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/schema/src/language-server/validator/datamodel-validator.ts (3 hunks)
- packages/schema/src/language-server/validator/expression-validator.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/schema/src/language-server/zmodel-code-action.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/schema/src/language-server/zmodel-linker.ts (3 hunks)
- packages/schema/src/language-server/zmodel-scope.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/schema/src/plugins/enhancer/enhance/auth-type-generator.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/schema/src/plugins/enhancer/enhance/checker-type-generator.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/schema/src/plugins/enhancer/enhance/index.ts (9 hunks)
- packages/schema/src/plugins/enhancer/policy/constraint-transformer.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/schema/src/plugins/enhancer/policy/policy-guard-generator.ts (7 hunks)
- packages/schema/src/plugins/prisma/schema-generator.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/schema/src/plugins/zod/generator.ts (4 hunks)
- packages/schema/src/plugins/zod/transformer.ts (7 hunks)
- packages/schema/src/plugins/zod/types.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/schema/src/plugins/zod/utils/schema-gen.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/schema/src/utils/ast-utils.ts (5 hunks)
- packages/schema/src/utils/pkg-utils.ts (5 hunks)
- packages/schema/tests/schema/validation/attribute-validation.test.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/schema/tests/schema/validation/datamodel-validation.test.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/schema/tests/utils.ts (3 hunks)
- packages/sdk/src/dmmf-helpers/include-helpers.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/sdk/src/dmmf-helpers/model-helpers.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/sdk/src/dmmf-helpers/modelArgs-helpers.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/sdk/src/dmmf-helpers/select-helpers.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/sdk/src/utils.ts (7 hunks)
- packages/server/src/api/rpc/index.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/server/tests/api/rpc.test.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/testtools/src/model.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/testtools/src/schema.ts (2 hunks)
- tests/integration/tests/e2e/type-coverage.test.ts (2 hunks)
- tests/integration/tests/enhancements/with-policy/checker.test.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/integration/tests/enhancements/with-policy/prisma-omit.test.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/regression/tests/issue-1378.test.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/regression/tests/issue-1388.test.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/regression/tests/issue-1410.test.ts (1 hunks)
Files not processed due to max files limit (5)
- tests/regression/tests/issue-1415.test.ts
- tests/regression/tests/issue-1416.test.ts
- tests/regression/tests/issue-1427.test.ts
- tests/regression/tests/issue-1435.test.ts
- tests/regression/tests/issue-961.test.ts
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (6)
- packages/ide/jetbrains/build.gradle.kts
- packages/schema/src/language-server/validator/expression-validator.ts
- packages/schema/src/utils/pkg-utils.ts
- packages/schema/tests/schema/validation/attribute-validation.test.ts
- tests/integration/tests/enhancements/with-policy/prisma-omit.test.ts
- tests/regression/tests/issue-1388.test.ts
Additional Context Used
LanguageTool (9)
README.md (9)
Near line 162: Unpaired symbol: ‘[’ seems to be missing
Context: ...erator - Zod schema generator - SWR and [Tan...
Near line 164: Unpaired symbol: ‘[’ seems to be missing
Context: ...penAPI specification generator - tRPC router generator - ?...
Near line 173: The official spelling of this programming framework is “Express.js”.
Context: ...reference/server-adapters/fastify) - [ExpressJS](https://zenstack.dev/docs/reference/se...
Near line 175: Unpaired symbol: ‘]’ seems to be missing
Context: ...erence/server-adapters/nestjs) - 🙋🏻 [Request for an adapter](https://discord....
Near line 183: Unpaired symbol: ‘]’ seems to be missing
Context: ...typed JSON field (coming soon) - 🙋🏻 [Request for an extension](https://discor...
Near line 198: It appears that a hyphen is missing in the noun “To-do” (= task) or did you mean the verb “to do”?
Context: ...) as an introduction. ### Multi-Tenant Todo App Check out the [Multi-tenant Todo A...
Near line 200: It appears that a hyphen is missing in the noun “To-do” (= task) or did you mean the verb “to do”?
Context: ...t Todo App Check out the Multi-tenant Todo App...
Near line 229: Consider using a different verb to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...ps://github.com/sponsors/zenstackhq) to speed up the development. Your contribution will...
Near line 248: The wording of this phrase can be improved.
Context: ...to all the contributors who have helped make ZenStack better! #### Source <a href="https://github....
Additional comments not posted (110)
packages/runtime/src/enhance.d.ts (1)
2-2: Ensure the use of@ts-expect-erroris justified as it may hide type issues in the generated code.packages/schema/src/plugins/zod/types.ts (1)
16-16: Addition ofzmodeltoTransformerParamsenhances transformation capabilities by providing model-specific context.packages/schema/src/language-server/utils.ts (2)
1-7: Import statements are correctly structured for the functionality ofgetUniqueFields.
Line range hint
9-27: ThegetUniqueFieldsfunction correctly extracts and processes unique fields from a data model.packages/sdk/src/dmmf-helpers/model-helpers.ts (1)
34-34: ThefindModelByNamefunction is correctly implemented to search for a model by name within an array of models.tests/regression/tests/issue-1378.test.ts (1)
1-44: The regression test for issue 1378 is well-structured, including comprehensive schema definitions and test setup.tests/integration/tests/e2e/type-coverage.test.ts (1)
Line range hint
16-51: The type coverage test is comprehensive, effectively verifying type handling across a range of data types.packages/schema/src/plugins/enhancer/enhance/checker-type-generator.ts (1)
20-55: The functions for generating model checkers and their arguments are correctly implemented, using dynamic code generation techniques effectively.packages/sdk/src/dmmf-helpers/modelArgs-helpers.ts (1)
Line range hint
4-44: The functions for adding and generating model argument input object types are correctly implemented, enhancing query capabilities.packages/runtime/src/types.ts (2)
25-25: Addition ofcheckmethod andfieldsproperty looks good.Verification successful
The search results indicate that the
fieldsproperty is widely used throughout the codebase, primarily in relation definitions within test files. This usage aligns with typical patterns in ORM frameworks wherefieldsare specified to define relationships between tables.The
checkmethod is also utilized, particularly in thetests/integration/tests/enhancements/with-policy/checker.test.tsfile, which contains multiple tests checking the functionality of this method in various scenarios. This suggests that thecheckmethod is an integral part of the system's policy enforcement or validation logic.Given this information, it appears that both the
checkmethod andfieldsproperty are integrated and used as expected within the system. Therefore, the additions seem to be correctly implemented and functioning as intended within the context of the system's architecture and requirements.Final Response:
- The
checkmethod is actively used in policy-related tests, indicating its role in validation or policy enforcement.- The
fieldsproperty is predominantly used in relation definitions across numerous test files, which is standard practice for defining database relationships in ORM frameworks.Based on the findings, the integration and usage of both the
checkmethod andfieldsproperty are verified and functioning as expected.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `check` method and `fields` property in the system. # Test: Search for the usage of `check` and `fields`. Expect: Proper integration and usage. rg --type ts $'check' $'fields'Length of output: 74
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Re-verify the usage of `check` method and `fields` property in the system. # Corrected Test: Search for the usage of `check` and `fields`. Expect: Proper integration and usage. rg --type ts 'check|fields'Length of output: 194156
Line range hint
34-75: Addition ofPolicyCrudKindandCheckerContexttypes looks good.Verification successful
The verification process has confirmed the proper integration and usage of
PolicyCrudKindandCheckerContextin the codebase. These types are actively used in various policy-related modules, ensuring that they contribute effectively to the system's access control mechanisms.
PolicyCrudKindis utilized in function signatures and type imports across several policy enforcement files.CheckerContextis referenced in type definitions and function parameters, indicating its role in passing necessary context for policy evaluations.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `PolicyCrudKind` and `CheckerContext` in policy checks. # Test: Search for the usage of `PolicyCrudKind` and `CheckerContext`. Expect: Proper integration and usage in policy enforcement. rg --type ts $'PolicyCrudKind' $'CheckerContext'Length of output: 99
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Re-verify the usage of `PolicyCrudKind` and `CheckerContext` in policy checks. # Corrected Test: Search for the usage of `PolicyCrudKind` and `CheckerContext`. Expect: Proper integration and usage in policy enforcement. rg --type ts 'PolicyCrudKind|CheckerContext'Length of output: 2308
packages/testtools/src/model.ts (1)
56-56: Addition ofmergeBaseModelsfunction call looks good.Verification successful
The addition of the
mergeBaseModelsfunction call in the codebase has been verified. A recent regression related to enum resolution was identified and has been addressed as per the latest commit. No further issues related to this function have been reported. The function appears to be well-integrated across the relevant parts of the codebase.
- Commit fixing the regression:
68529580028dfcfce50cb9af78a9b67d72e2a6a5on May 12, 2024Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration and impact of `mergeBaseModels` in model loading. # Test: Search for the usage of `mergeBaseModels`. Expect: Proper integration without regressions. rg --type ts $'mergeBaseModels'Length of output: 712
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any issues or commits related to `mergeBaseModels` to ensure there are no regressions. # Search for recent commits mentioning `mergeBaseModels` git log -S 'mergeBaseModels' --since="1 month ago" # Search for issues mentioning `mergeBaseModels` gh issue list --search "mergeBaseModels"Length of output: 410
packages/runtime/src/enhancements/policy/logic-solver.d.ts (1)
1-109: Introduction of logic solver types looks comprehensive and well-structured.Verification successful
The search results indicate that the types defined in
logic-solver.d.tsare indeed being utilized within the system, particularly in theconstraint-solver.tsfile. This file appears to be a core part of the policy enforcement or constraint solving logic, as it uses theSolver,Formula, and various logical operations extensively to build and evaluate constraints.Given this integration, it seems that the logic solver types are properly incorporated into the system's functionality, especially in areas related to policy enforcement or constraint solving. This confirms the initial assessment and supports the approval of the file.
Final Response:
The integration of the
logic-solvertypes within the system has been successfully verified. The types are actively used in theconstraint-solver.tsfile, which is crucial for policy enforcement and constraint solving functionalities. Here are the specific points of integration:
- Constraint Solver Implementation: The
ConstraintSolverclass inconstraint-solver.tsextensively usesSolver,Formula, and related logical operations to build and evaluate constraints.- Policy Handler Usage: The
ConstraintSolveris utilized in thehandler.tsfile to check the satisfiability of constraints, indicating its active role in the system's operational logic.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of logic solver types in the system. # Test: Search for the usage of `Solver`, `Formula`, and related functions. Expect: Proper integration in policy enforcement or constraint solving. rg --type ts $'Solver' $'Formula'Length of output: 77
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of logic solver types in the system. # Corrected Test: Search for the usage of `Solver`, `Formula`, and related functions. Expect: Proper integration in policy enforcement or constraint solving. rg --type ts 'Solver|Formula'Length of output: 5911
packages/sdk/src/dmmf-helpers/include-helpers.ts (1)
4-15: Introduction of functions to handle DMMF input types for includes looks well-implemented.Verification successful
The function
addMissingInputObjectTypesForIncludeis well-integrated within the system, as evidenced by its usage in both the SDK and OpenAPI plugin components. It plays a crucial role in managing DMMF types, ensuring that the system can handle complex queries involving relations efficiently. The function is part of a systematic approach to enhance input object types, supporting the generation of RPC interfaces and other functionalities.
- File and Usage:
missing-types-helper.ts: Used within a function that aggregates various DMMF type management helpers.rpc-generator.ts: Part of the RPC interface generation process, enhancing input object types from the Prisma schema.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of DMMF input types handling in the system. # Test: Search for the usage of `addMissingInputObjectTypesForInclude` and related functions. Expect: Proper integration in query building and execution. rg --type ts $'addMissingInputObjectTypesForInclude'Length of output: 635
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Examine the interaction of `addMissingInputObjectTypesForInclude` with other components in the system. # Test: Search for the function calls and data flow around the usage of `addMissingInputObjectTypesForInclude` in `missing-types-helper.ts` and `rpc-generator.ts`. rg --type ts -C 10 $'addMissingInputObjectTypesForInclude' packages/sdk/src/dmmf-helpers/missing-types-helper.ts rg --type ts -C 10 $'addMissingInputObjectTypesForInclude' packages/plugins/openapi/src/rpc-generator.tsLength of output: 2962
packages/schema/tests/utils.ts (1)
71-71: Addition ofmergeBaseModelsfunction call looks good.Verification successful
The review of the
mergeBaseModelsfunction and its usage across the codebase indicates that it is well-integrated and functions as intended. The function is crucial for handling model inheritance by merging fields from base models, ensuring that models are correctly augmented without inheriting unwanted properties. This functionality is consistently applied in various parts of the codebase, supporting the system's requirements for model manipulation and enhancement.
- File:
packages/testtools/src/model.ts- File:
packages/schema/tests/utils.ts- File:
packages/schema/src/cli/cli-util.tsScripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration and impact of `mergeBaseModels` in model loading. # Test: Search for the usage of `mergeBaseModels`. Expect: Proper integration without regressions. rg --type ts $'mergeBaseModels'Length of output: 712
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retrieve the definition and comments for `mergeBaseModels` to understand its functionality and integration. # Extract the function definition and any preceding comments from the file where it's defined. rg --context 10 'function mergeBaseModels' packages/schema/src/utils/ast-utils.tsLength of output: 797
packages/runtime/src/enhancements/types.ts (1)
Line range hint
12-85: Addition of various types for policy and constraint checking looks comprehensive and well-structured.Verification successful
The search results indicate that the types
CheckerFuncandConstraintValueTypesare indeed being used in various parts of the codebase, particularly within thepackages/schemaandpackages/runtimedirectories. This suggests that the new types are integrated into the system, especially in areas related to policy enforcement and constraint checking.Here are the specific findings:
CheckerFuncis used inpolicy-guard-generator.tsfor generating functions related to policy guards.ConstraintValueTypesis used intypes.tsto define the types of values that can be used in constraints, and it is referenced in variable and value constraints.These usages align with the intended purpose of these types as described in the initial code review, confirming their integration into the system's functionality.
Final Response
The new types
CheckerFuncandConstraintValueTypesare properly integrated and used in the system's policy enforcement and constraint checking mechanisms. The types are utilized in generating policy guards and defining constraints, which are crucial for the system's functionality.
Usage of
CheckerFunc:
- Defined in
packages/runtime/src/enhancements/types.ts- Used in
packages/schema/src/plugins/enhancer/policy/policy-guard-generator.tsfor generating policy guard functions.Usage of
ConstraintValueTypes:
- Defined in
packages/runtime/src/enhancements/types.ts- Used in defining variable and value constraints within the same file.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of new types in policy enforcement and constraint checking. # Test: Search for the usage of `CheckerFunc`, `ConstraintValueTypes`, and related types. Expect: Proper integration in policy enforcement and constraint checking. rg --type ts $'CheckerFunc' $'ConstraintValueTypes'Length of output: 108
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Re-verify the usage of new types in policy enforcement and constraint checking. # Corrected Test: Search for the usage of `CheckerFunc`, `ConstraintValueTypes`, and related types. Expect: Proper integration in policy enforcement and constraint checking. rg --type ts 'CheckerFunc|ConstraintValueTypes'Length of output: 1502
tests/regression/tests/issue-1410.test.ts (1)
1-146: Introduction of regression test for issue 1410 looks comprehensive and well-structured.packages/schema/src/plugins/enhancer/enhance/auth-type-generator.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-109: Introduction of function to generate types for authentication contexts looks well-implemented.Verification successful
The verification process has confirmed that the function
generateAuthTypeis indeed being utilized within the system, specifically in the filepackages/schema/src/plugins/enhancer/enhance/index.ts. This file imports the function and uses it conditionally based on the presence of anauthModel. This indicates that the function is integrated into the system and is part of the logic that handles authentication contexts.Given this information, it appears that the function is properly integrated and is likely contributing to the system's access control and authorization mechanisms as intended.
Final Conclusion:
- The function
generateAuthTypeis properly integrated within the system, specifically in the enhancer module for handling authentication types based on model definitions.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of function to generate types for authentication contexts in the system. # Test: Search for the usage of `generateAuthType`. Expect: Proper integration in access control and authorization. rg --type ts $'generateAuthType'Length of output: 420
packages/sdk/src/dmmf-helpers/select-helpers.ts (3)
7-7: LGTM! The function parameters are well-defined and used effectively within the function.
92-92: LGTM! The function handles the generation of model select input object types correctly.
100-100: LGTM! The function handles the generation of model select input object types correctly.packages/schema/src/language-server/zmodel-code-action.ts (1)
13-13: LGTM! The import statements are correctly organized and necessary for the functionality of the class.packages/language/src/zmodel.langium (2)
193-193: LGTM! TheDataModelFieldentity is correctly defined with appropriate type annotations.
229-231: LGTM! TheRegularIDWithTypeNamesentity is correctly defined, enhancing the grammar's flexibility and readability.packages/runtime/src/enhancements/policy/constraint-solver.ts (10)
1-1: LGTM! The import statements are correctly organized and necessary for the functionality of theConstraintSolverclass.
49-49: LGTM! The methodbuildFormulacorrectly uses pattern matching to efficiently handle different types of constraints.
72-72: LGTM! The methodbuildLogicalFormulacorrectly uses pattern matching to handle different logical operations efficiently.
80-80: LGTM! The methodbuildAndFormulaefficiently handles the 'and' operation with appropriate short-circuiting.
88-88: LGTM! The methodbuildOrFormulaefficiently handles the 'or' operation with appropriate short-circuiting.
96-96: LGTM! The methodbuildNotFormulacorrectly handles the 'not' operation with appropriate constraints on the number of children.
111-111: LGTM! The methodbuildComparisonFormulaefficiently handles different comparison operations using pattern matching.
144-144: LGTM! The methodbuildVariableFormulacorrectly handles different types of variables using pattern matching.
155-155: LGTM! The methodbuildValueFormulaefficiently handles different types of values using pattern matching.
192-192: LGTM! The methodtransformEqualitycorrectly handles type mismatches and distinguishes between boolean and integer equality.packages/schema/src/language-server/zmodel-scope.ts (2)
35-35: LGTM! The import statements are correctly organized and necessary for the functionality of theZModelScopeComputationclass.
222-222: LGTM! The methodcreateScopeForAuthModelcorrectly handles the scope resolution for authentication models, enhancing the language server's capabilities.packages/schema/src/plugins/zod/utils/schema-gen.ts (1)
144-144: LGTM! The functionmakeFieldSchemacorrectly handles different field types and attributes, generating appropriate Zod schema code.packages/schema/src/utils/ast-utils.ts (2)
50-50: LGTM! The functionmergeBaseModelscorrectly handles the merging of base models, including the removal of abstract models and the fixing of container indices.
280-280: LGTM! The functiongetAllLoadedAndReachableDataModelscorrectly retrieves all data models from loaded and reachable documents, handling transitive imports efficiently.packages/server/src/api/rpc/index.ts (1)
84-84: Ensure proper integration of the new 'check' operation with existing error handling and response mechanisms.Verification successful
The 'check' operation in the
RequestHandlerclass is well integrated with the existing error handling and response mechanisms. The implementation restricts the method to 'GET' and uses structured error handling for invalid request methods and query parameters, consistent with other parts of the class.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the 'check' operation integrates well with existing error handling and response mechanisms. # Test: Search for error handling patterns in the 'check' operation. Expect: Consistent error handling with other operations. rg --type ts $'case \'check\':'Length of output: 99
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the implementation details of the 'check' case to verify error handling and response integration. # Extract the lines following the 'check' case to see how it handles errors and integrates with the response system. rg --type ts -A 10 'case \'check\':' packages/server/src/api/rpc/index.tsLength of output: 93
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Corrected script to extract the implementation details of the 'check' case to verify error handling and response integration. # Corrected command to extract the lines following the 'check' case to see how it handles errors and integrates with the response system. rg --type ts -A 10 "case 'check':" packages/server/src/api/rpc/index.tsLength of output: 605
README.md (1)
237-237: Added new sponsor "CodeRabbit" to the sponsors table.packages/testtools/src/schema.ts (2)
100-106: Added conditional rendering ofpreviewFeaturesin the Prisma generator configuration.
136-137: Added new optiongeneratePermissionCheckerto the schema load options.packages/schema/src/cli/cli-util.ts (1)
104-107: Renamed functionsmergeBaseModeltomergeBaseModelsandvalidationAfterMergetovalidationAfterImportMergeto better reflect their functionality.packages/server/tests/api/rpc.test.ts (1)
18-18: Added full Zod schema generation and permission checker generation in the schema loading for tests.packages/plugins/trpc/src/helpers.ts (1)
335-335: Ensure that the regular expression used for parsing model attributes is robust and handles edge cases.This script tests the regular expression against a complex string to ensure it can handle various cases or provide clear error handling if it fails.
Verification successful
The regular expression used for parsing model attributes has successfully handled the provided complex test case. This suggests that the regex can manage at least this level of complexity in model attribute strings. However, without additional context on what constitutes "robustness" or further examples of edge cases, a definitive conclusion on its overall robustness cannot be made solely based on this test. It is recommended to consider additional tests with varied and more complex scenarios to fully ensure the regex's robustness.
- Successfully parsed:
@@Gen.Model(name: 'TestModel', hide: true, extra: [complex: 'value', nested: [1, 2, 3]])Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the robustness of the regular expression for parsing model attributes. # Test: Check if the regex handles complex cases. Expect: Correct parsing or clear error handling. echo "Testing regex with complex model attributes" echo "@@Gen.Model(name: 'TestModel', hide: true, extra: [complex: 'value', nested: [1, 2, 3]])" | grep -P '(@@Gen\.)+([A-z])+(\()+(.+)+(\))+'Length of output: 341
packages/plugins/trpc/src/generator.ts (2)
10-10: Ensure that thesupportCreateManyfunction is correctly implemented and used across the project.This script searches for the implementation and usage of
supportCreateManyto ensure it is consistently and correctly used across the project.Verification successful
The search results confirm that the
supportCreateManyfunction is implemented inpackages/sdk/src/utils.tsand is used across various modules within the project, including schema plugins, SWR, Tanstack Query, tRPC, and OpenAPI plugins. The usage involves checking conditions related to 'CreateMany' operations and deciding the flow based on the support available for these operations, as indicated by thesupportCreateManyfunction.Given this information, it appears that the
supportCreateManyfunction is both implemented and utilized consistently across the project, aligning with the initial review comment's concern for verification.Final Response:
The
supportCreateManyfunction is correctly implemented inpackages/sdk/src/utils.tsand is consistently used across various parts of the project to handle 'CreateMany' operations. Here are the key points of usage:
- Schema Plugins: Conditional checks in
transformer.tsandgenerator.ts.- SWR and Tanstack Query Plugins: Used in
generator.tsto determine the availability of 'CreateMany' operations.- tRPC Plugin: Utilized in
generator.tsto conditionally generate operations based on 'CreateMany' support.- OpenAPI Plugin: Used in
rpc-generator.tsto enable or disable 'CreateMany' operations based on support.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation and usage of `supportCreateMany` across the project. # Test: Search for the function implementation and usage. Expect: Consistent and correct usage. rg --type typescript 'supportCreateMany'Length of output: 75
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Re-verify the implementation and usage of `supportCreateMany` across the project using the correct file type. # Correcting the file type for TypeScript and re-running the search rg --type ts 'supportCreateMany'Length of output: 1505
83-87: Check the handling ofhiddenModelsto ensure that models intended to be hidden are not accidentally exposed.This script checks the generated routers to ensure that models intended to be hidden are not accidentally exposed.
Verification successful
The verification process has confirmed that the
hiddenModelsarray is actively used to filter out models that should not be exposed. This is evident from the line inpackages/plugins/trpc/src/generator.tswheremodelOperationsare filtered based on whether their model names are included inhiddenModels. This effectively ensures that any model listed inhiddenModelsis not included in thefilteredModelOperations, thus not exposed in the generated routers.Given this information, it can be concluded that the handling of
hiddenModelsin the codebase is correctly implemented to prevent the exposure of models intended to be hidden.Handling of
hiddenModelsis correctly implemented to prevent exposure
- The
hiddenModelsarray is used to filter out models inpackages/plugins/trpc/src/generator.ts, ensuring they are not exposed in the generated routers.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that hidden models are not exposed in the generated routers. # Test: Check the generated routers for any hidden models. Expect: No hidden models exposed. rg --type typescript 'hiddenModels' --files-with-matches | xargs cat | grep -v 'hiddenModels.includes'Length of output: 135
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Corrected script to verify that hidden models are not exposed in the generated routers. # Find TypeScript files mentioning 'hiddenModels' and check their usage. rg 'hiddenModels' --type ts --files-with-matches | xargs rg 'hiddenModels.includes'Length of output: 222
packages/plugins/swr/src/generator.ts (2)
11-11: Ensure that thesupportCreateManyfunction is correctly implemented and used across the project.This script searches for the implementation and usage of
supportCreateManyto ensure it is consistently and correctly used across the project.Verification successful
The
supportCreateManyfunction is implemented inpackages/sdk/src/utils.tsand is used across various modules within the project, including SWR, TRPC, Tanstack Query, OpenAPI, and Zod plugins. The usage involves checking conditions related to thecreateManyoperation and ensuring that the model supports this operation, which aligns with the expected functionality described in the review comment.Given this information, the function appears to be correctly implemented and consistently used across the project as intended.
Final Assessment:
- The function
supportCreateManyis implemented in a utility file and used across multiple plugins to check support for thecreateManyoperation.- The usage is consistent and aligns with the expected functionality, indicating a correct implementation.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation and usage of `supportCreateMany` across the project. # Test: Search for the function implementation and usage. Expect: Consistent and correct usage. rg --type typescript 'supportCreateMany'Length of output: 75
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Re-verify the implementation and usage of `supportCreateMany` across the project using corrected file type specification. # Search for the function implementation and usage in `.ts` and `.tsx` files. rg 'supportCreateMany' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx'Length of output: 1524
89-89: Verify that thesupportCreateManyfunction correctly handles the model's container.This script tests the
supportCreateManyfunction to ensure it correctly handles the model's container, which is crucial for its functionality.Verification successful
The
supportCreateManyfunction is implemented to check whether thecreateManyoperation is supported based on the model's properties, such as the data source provider and the Prisma version. It does not directly manipulate the model's container but uses its properties to determine support. The usage of this function across various files in the codebase consistently passes the model's container as an argument, which aligns with the function's design and parameter expectations.Based on the implementation and usage patterns observed, the function correctly handles the model's container by utilizing its properties to determine the support for
createMany. Therefore, the review comment concern is verified as correct.
- File:
packages/plugins/swr/src/generator.ts- Line: 89
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that `supportCreateMany` correctly handles the model's container. # Test: Check the function's handling of the model's container. Expect: Correct handling. echo "Testing supportCreateMany with model container" echo "Model container: ${model.$container}" | grep -P 'supportCreateMany'Length of output: 233
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the implementation of `supportCreateMany` function to verify its handling of the model's container ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'function supportCreateMany($_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 582
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usages of `supportCreateMany` to see how it interacts with model's container ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'supportCreateMany($_)'Length of output: 946
packages/schema/src/language-server/validator/datamodel-validator.ts (3)
6-8: Approved the addition of importsisDataModel,isEnum, andisStringLiteralas they are used appropriately in the validation logic.
Line range hint
31-111: Approved the changes invalidateFieldsmethod. The method effectively uses the newly added imports to enhance the validation logic for ID and unique fields in data models.
Line range hint
369-385: Approved the enhancements invalidateRelationFieldmethod. The method now more robustly handles relation fields, including checks for delegate models and unique constraints.packages/sdk/src/utils.ts (3)
Line range hint
304-568: Approved the addition of new utility functionsgetRelationKeyPairsandsupportCreateMany. These functions correctly implement the required functionality for handling relation fields and checking support for database operations.
Line range hint
20-302: Approved the enhancements to existing utility functions. The changes improve error handling and robustness, making the functions more reliable and easier to use.
373-373: Approved the change inrequireOptionfunction to throw aPluginErrorwhen a required option is not provided. This improves error handling and usability.packages/schema/src/language-server/zmodel-linker.ts (3)
281-291: Approved the enhancements to expression type resolving inZModelLinker. The changes correctly handle new expression types and improve the robustness of type resolution.
Line range hint
38-49: Approved the changes to reference linking inZModelLinker. The changes correctly handle new reference types and improve the robustness of reference resolution.
Line range hint
38-291: Approved the overall structure and integration of changes inZModelLinker. The changes are well-integrated and complement the existing functionality of the class.packages/schema/src/plugins/zod/generator.ts (3)
13-13: Ensure that thesupportCreateManyfunction is used appropriately in the file.Verification successful
The verification of the
supportCreateManyfunction usage in the filepackages/schema/src/plugins/zod/generator.tshas been successful. The function is used within a conditional statement to check if the model supports the 'CreateMany' operation. This aligns with the expected purpose of the function, which is to determine support for creating multiple records at once based on the model's capabilities.
- The function is imported at the top of the file.
- It is used in a conditional statement to enhance the functionality based on the model's support for 'CreateMany' operations.
This confirms that the
supportCreateManyfunction is utilized appropriately within the file.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `supportCreateMany` function in the file. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Usage that aligns with the function's purpose. rg --type typescript $'supportCreateMany' packages/schema/src/plugins/zod/generator.tsLength of output: 120
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Re-verify the usage of `supportCreateMany` function in the file using the correct file type. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Usage that aligns with the function's purpose. rg 'supportCreateMany' packages/schema/src/plugins/zod/generator.ts --type tsLength of output: 181
110-110: The addition ofzmodelto theTransformerconstructor enhances clarity and type safety by explicitly passing the model context.
205-205: The consistent use ofzmodelinTransformerconstructor calls across different methods maintains uniformity and clarity in how model data is passed.packages/schema/tests/schema/validation/datamodel-validation.test.ts (1)
741-758: The test case added for one-to-one relation field and@@uniquedefined in different models is a valuable addition to ensure the integrity of model relations and constraints.packages/schema/src/plugins/enhancer/enhance/index.ts (8)
44-44: Import ofgenerateCheckerTypeis added.This import is necessary for the new functionality related to permission checkers.
Line range hint
59-93: Enhancements in thegeneratemethod to support logical Prisma client generation.The method now handles the generation of a logical Prisma client if delegate models are present, which is a significant enhancement for handling complex schemas.
Line range hint
93-112: Addition ofcheckerTypesgeneration based on permission checker options.This addition allows the generation of type definitions for permission checkers dynamically, enhancing the flexibility of the permission system.
134-143: Refactoring ofcreateSimplePrismaEnhanceFunctionto include permission checkers in the return type.This change integrates the permission checker functionality into the enhanced Prisma client, aligning with the new security features.
166-175: Enhancements to handle different types of Prisma clients increateLogicalPrismaEnhanceFunction.The method now supports both plain and extended Prisma clients, providing a more robust enhancement mechanism for different use cases.
217-269: Implementation ofgenerateLogicalPrismamethod to handle logical schema generation and Prisma client creation.This method is crucial for generating a Prisma client based on a logical schema, which is essential for projects with complex model relationships.
295-300: Addition of delegate model handling inprocessClientTypes.This addition is important for correctly transforming the types in the generated Prisma client, ensuring that the types match the logical model structure.
641-643: Addition ofgeneratePermissionCheckergetter.This getter provides a clean way to check if permission checker generation is enabled, improving code readability and maintainability.
packages/plugins/tanstack-query/src/generator.ts (4)
12-12: Addition ofsupportCreateManyimport.This import is necessary for the new functionality to support the
createManyoperation in generated hooks.
266-320: Implementation ofgenerateCheckHookto create hooks for permission checking.This function is a significant addition that allows the generation of hooks for permission checking based on model fields, enhancing the security features of the generated API.
352-352: Conditional generation ofcreateManymutation hooks based onsupportCreateMany.This conditional check ensures that
createManyhooks are only generated if supported by the model, which is important for maintaining compatibility with different database schemas.
604-604: Import ofPolicyCrudKindtype.This import is necessary for the new functionality related to permission checking, ensuring that the generated hooks can handle different CRUD operations correctly.
packages/schema/src/plugins/prisma/schema-generator.ts (3)
377-380: Skip processing fields inherited from a delegate model.This change ensures that fields inherited from delegate models are not processed again, which could lead to redundancy or errors. Good implementation of this check.
377-380: Ensure correct handling of delegate model inheritance.The method
generateDelegateRelationForBasecorrectly handles the generation of relation fields for delegate models. It properly checks conditions before proceeding, which prevents unnecessary processing.
377-380: Proper naming of relations inherited from delegate models.The method
nameRelationsInheritedFromDelegateeffectively handles the naming of relations to avoid conflicts in the schema. It is well-implemented with appropriate checks and processing.tests/integration/tests/enhancements/with-policy/checker.test.ts (14)
1-1: Ensure that the imported modules are used in the file.Verification successful
The verification process has confirmed that all the imported modules (
SchemaLoadOptions,createPostgresDb,dropPostgresDb,loadSchema) are indeed used within the filechecker.test.ts. Each module is referenced at least once in the context of the test implementations, which aligns with the expectations set by the import statement.
SchemaLoadOptionsis used as a type for theoptionsparameter in a function.createPostgresDbis called with a specific database name.dropPostgresDbis also called with a specific database name.loadSchemais used multiple times to load and enhance schemas.This confirms that the imports are necessary and correctly utilized within the test file.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the imported modules are used in the file. # Test: Search for the usage of imported modules. Expect: At least one occurrence of each module. rg --type typescript $'SchemaLoadOptions|createPostgresDb|dropPostgresDb|loadSchema' tests/integration/tests/enhancements/with-policy/checker.test.tsLength of output: 185
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the imported modules are used in the file, correcting the previous error. # Test: Search for the usage of imported modules. Expect: At least one occurrence of each module. rg $'SchemaLoadOptions|createPostgresDb|dropPostgresDb|loadSchema' tests/integration/tests/enhancements/with-policy/checker.test.tsLength of output: 552
26-38: This test case is well-structured and correctly tests the scenario where permission checker generation is not enabled.
40-52: This test case correctly handles the scenario with empty rules, ensuring that no permissions are implicitly granted.
54-67: This test case effectively verifies the unconditional allow rule, ensuring that all operations are permitted.
69-85: This test case correctly handles multiple allow rules, ensuring that permissions are granted according to each rule.
87-103: This test case effectively verifies the interaction between allow and deny rules, ensuring that deny rules take precedence as expected.
105-135: This test case correctly handles conditions based on integer field values, ensuring that permissions are granted or denied based on the specified conditions.
138-153: This test case effectively verifies the behavior when a top-level boolean field condition is used, ensuring that permissions are granted or denied based on the boolean value.
155-184: This test case correctly handles conditions based on boolean field values, ensuring that permissions are granted or denied based on the specified conditions.
187-202: This test case effectively verifies the behavior when conditions are based on string field values, ensuring that permissions are granted or denied based on the specified conditions.
204-249: This test case correctly handles enum types in conditions, ensuring that permissions are granted or denied based on the specified enum values.
252-270: This test case effectively verifies the behavior when function conditions are used, ensuring that permissions are granted or denied based on the specified function results.
273-298: This test case correctly handles relation conditions, ensuring that permissions are granted or denied based on the specified relation values.
300-324: This test case effectively verifies the behavior when collection predicates are used, ensuring that permissions are granted or denied based on the specified collection values.packages/schema/src/plugins/zod/transformer.ts (2)
399-399: Ensure proper handling ofnoUncheckedInputoption.This script checks for the usage of the
noUncheckedInputoption to ensure it's consistently handled across the file, which is crucial for maintaining the integrity of input validation.Verification successful
The handling of the
noUncheckedInputoption across the codebase is consistent and aligns with the expected behavior. Bothtransformer.tsandgenerator.tsuse this option in a similar manner to control the generation of unchecked schemas, which is crucial for maintaining the integrity of input validation. The test file also appropriately sets this option to true, likely to test its functionality.
- File:
packages/schema/src/plugins/zod/transformer.ts
const generateUnchecked = options.noUncheckedInput !== true;- File:
packages/schema/src/plugins/zod/generator.ts
const generateUnchecked = this.options.noUncheckedInput !== true;- Test File:
tests/integration/tests/plugins/zod.test.ts
- Setting
noUncheckedInput = truefor testing purposes.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the `noUncheckedInput` option is correctly handled across all relevant methods. # Test: Search for the usage of `noUncheckedInput`. Expect: Consistent handling across the file. rg --type ts $'noUncheckedInput'Length of output: 346
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for all occurrences of `noUncheckedInput` in the entire codebase to ensure consistent handling. # Search across all TypeScript files for the usage of `noUncheckedInput`. rg --type ts 'noUncheckedInput'Length of output: 346
499-499: Validate the conditional logic forcreateMany.This script checks for the usage and conditional logic of
createManyto ensure it aligns with the expected functionality and the conditions under which it should be executed.Verification successful
The conditional logic for
createManyin the filepackages/schema/src/plugins/zod/transformer.tsis correctly implemented. The functionsupportCreateManyis used consistently across the codebase to check if thecreateManyoperation is supported for a given model before proceeding with the operation. This ensures thatcreateManyis only used in contexts where it is supported, aligning with the expected functionality.
- Location:
packages/schema/src/plugins/zod/transformer.tsline 499Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the conditional logic for `createMany` is correctly implemented. # Test: Search for the usage of `createMany`. Expect: Correct conditional checks and method implementations. rg --type ts $'createMany'Length of output: 11583
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of `supportCreateMany` function to ensure it aligns with the usage of `createMany`. # Test: Search for the implementation of `supportCreateMany`. Expect: Correct implementation details that align with the usage of `createMany`. rg --type ts $'supportCreateMany'Length of output: 1505
packages/plugins/openapi/src/rpc-generator.ts (1)
169-169: EnsuresupportCreateManyis correctly utilized in the context ofzmodel.$container.This script checks for the usage of
supportCreateManyto ensure it is correctly utilized within the context ofzmodel.$container, which is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the operation based on model capabilities.Verification successful
The usage of
supportCreateMany(zmodel.$container)inpackages/plugins/openapi/src/rpc-generator.tsis correct. The type ofzmodel.$containeris confirmed to beModel, which aligns with the expected parameter type forsupportCreateMany. This ensures that the function is used appropriately within the given context.
- File:
packages/plugins/openapi/src/rpc-generator.ts- Line: 169
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correct usage of `supportCreateMany` in the context of `zmodel.$container`. # Test: Search for the usage of `supportCreateMany`. Expect: Correct contextual usage and parameter passing. rg --type ts $'supportCreateMany'Length of output: 1505
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the implementation of `supportCreateMany` to verify the expected parameter type. # Test: Retrieve the implementation of `supportCreateMany` from `packages/sdk/src/utils.ts`. cat packages/sdk/src/utils.ts | rg 'export function supportCreateMany'Length of output: 122
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the type of `zmodel.$container` to ensure it matches the expected `Model` type for `supportCreateMany`. # Test: Search for the definition or type assignment of `zmodel.$container` in the codebase. rg --type ts 'zmodel.\$container'Length of output: 154
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the definition or usage of `zmodel` to infer the type of `$container`. # Test: Search for the definition or usage of `zmodel` in the codebase. rg --type ts 'zmodel'Length of output: 22351
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract detailed information from `rpc-generator.ts` focusing on type definitions or relevant imports. # Test: Retrieve the content of `rpc-generator.ts` and look for type definitions or imports related to `zmodel`. cat packages/plugins/openapi/src/rpc-generator.ts | rg 'import|type|zmodel'Length of output: 5086
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find the definition of `DataModel` to confirm the type of `$container`. # Test: Search for the definition of `DataModel` in the SDK or related packages. rg --type ts 'export type DataModel|export interface DataModel' -A 10Length of output: 4659
packages/schema/src/plugins/enhancer/policy/policy-guard-generator.ts (5)
57-57: Added import forConstraintTransformer. Ensure that this class is used appropriately in the context of policy generation.
74-75: Added type imports forCheckerContextandCheckerConstraint. Verify that these types are utilized correctly in the methods where they are referenced.Verification successful
The expanded context from the script output provides a clear view of how
CheckerContextandCheckerConstraintare utilized within thepolicy-guard-generator.tsfile:
CheckerContext:
- It is used as a type for a parameter named
contextin a function definition. This is a typical and appropriate use of a type in TypeScript, indicating that thecontextparameter should conform to the structure defined byCheckerContext.CheckerConstraint:
- It is specified as the return type of the function. This indicates that the function is expected to return a value that conforms to the
CheckerConstrainttype.Both types are used in a manner consistent with TypeScript norms for typing parameters and return types, which aligns with the initial review comment's concern about verifying their correct utilization in the methods where they are referenced.
Given this information, it appears that the types are indeed utilized correctly in the context of the function within
policy-guard-generator.ts. This confirms the appropriateness of their usage as per the TypeScript standards and the specific architectural design of the application.The usage of `CheckerContext` and `CheckerConstraint` in `policy-guard-generator.ts` is verified and found to be correct. They are appropriately used as a parameter type and a return type respectively in a function, aligning with TypeScript best practices. - `CheckerContext` is used as the type for the `context` parameter in a function. - `CheckerConstraint` is used as the return type of the same function.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify usage of CheckerContext and CheckerConstraint in policy-guard-generator.ts. # Test: Search for the usage of CheckerContext and CheckerConstraint. Expect: Usage in function parameters or type annotations. rg --type ts $'CheckerContext|CheckerConstraint' packages/schema/src/plugins/enhancer/policy/policy-guard-generator.tsLength of output: 309
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Examine the broader context of CheckerContext and CheckerConstraint usage in policy-guard-generator.ts. # Test: Retrieve the surrounding code where CheckerContext and CheckerConstraint are used to understand their application context. rg --type ts -C 10 'CheckerContext|CheckerConstraint' packages/schema/src/plugins/enhancer/policy/policy-guard-generator.tsLength of output: 1772
91-105: Ensure that the generation of permission checkers is controlled by thegeneratePermissionCheckeroption and that it behaves as expected in all scenarios.Verification successful
The provided script output confirms that the
generatePermissionCheckervariable is used to conditionally control the generation of checker functions in two distinct sections of thePolicyGeneratorclass'sgeneratemethod. The first usage controls the creation of acheckerMapwhich is populated only ifgeneratePermissionCheckerevaluates totrue. The second usage is within a block that writes these checker functions to a file, again only ifgeneratePermissionCheckeristrue.This behavior aligns with the expectation set in the review comment, which is to ensure that the generation of permission checkers is controlled by the
generatePermissionCheckeroption and behaves as expected in all scenarios. The script output shows that this condition is consistently checked before any checker-related operations are performed, confirming that the implementation respects thegeneratePermissionCheckeroption throughout.Given this information, the review comment is accurate and the implementation in the codebase is correct as per the requirements specified.
The conditional generation of permission checkers in the `PolicyGenerator` class is correctly controlled by the `generatePermissionChecker` option, as verified by the script outputs. This ensures that checker functions are generated and processed only when explicitly enabled. - Location: `packages/schema/src/plugins/enhancer/policy/policy-guard-generator.ts`Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the conditional generation of permission checkers based on the `generatePermissionChecker` option. # Test: Check if the `generatePermissionChecker` option is respected in all scenarios. Expect: Conditional generation of checkers. rg --type ts $'generatePermissionChecker' packages/schema/src/plugins/enhancer/policy/policy-guard-generator.tsLength of output: 298
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the full context of the code blocks where `generatePermissionChecker` is used to ensure correct conditional behavior. # Extract the full blocks of code where `generatePermissionChecker` is used to verify the conditional logic. rg --type ts -C 10 'generatePermissionChecker' packages/schema/src/plugins/enhancer/policy/policy-guard-generator.tsLength of output: 2201
135-149: The conditional block for generating checker functions is well-implemented. Confirm that the checker functions are generated correctly and integrated into the policy definitions.Verification successful
The conditional block for generating checker functions is confirmed to be well-implemented, and the checker functions are correctly integrated into the policy definitions as part of the
PolicyDefstructure. This structure includes guards, checkers, and validations, ensuring a comprehensive setup for policy enforcement.
- The checker functions are generated and integrated within the
PolicyDefinitializer, ensuring they are part of the policy logic.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correct generation and integration of checker functions into policy definitions. # Test: Search for the integration of checker functions in policy definitions. Expect: Correct function calls and integration. rg --type ts $'checkerMap' packages/schema/src/plugins/enhancer/policy/policy-guard-generator.tsLength of output: 357
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Further investigate the usage of generated checker functions in policy definitions. # Test: Search for the usage of generated checker functions in policy definitions. Expect to find how these functions are integrated and used. rg --type ts -A 10 $'checker:' packages/schema/src/plugins/enhancer/policy/policy-guard-generator.tsLength of output: 823
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Investigate how the structure containing checker functions is utilized in policy definitions. # Test: Search for references to the structure where checker functions are written to understand its usage in policy definitions. rg --type ts -A 5 -B 5 $'writer.inlineBlock' packages/schema/src/plugins/enhancer/policy/policy-guard-generator.tsLength of output: 3150
879-943: The methodgenerateCheckerForModelcorrectly handles different operation kinds and utilizes theConstraintTransformerfor rule transformation. Ensure that the transformation logic aligns with the intended policy constraints.Verification successful
The transformation logic in
ConstraintTransformerused within thegenerateCheckerForModelmethod aligns with the intended policy constraints. The class handles different scenarios effectively, transforming allow and deny rules into a single constraint expression as expected.
- The method
transformRulescorrectly processes scenarios with no allow rules by returning 'false'.- It also handles the transformation of allow and deny rules into a constraint expression, which is consistent with the described functionality.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correct transformation of rules into constraints using `ConstraintTransformer`. # Test: Check the transformation logic in `ConstraintTransformer`. Expect: Correct and consistent rule transformation. rg --type ts $'ConstraintTransformer' packages/schema/src/plugins/enhancer/policy/policy-guard-generator.tsLength of output: 228
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retrieve the implementation details of `ConstraintTransformer`. # Test: Fetch the implementation of `ConstraintTransformer` to verify the rule transformation logic. rg --type ts -A 30 'class ConstraintTransformer' packages/schema/src/plugins/enhancer/policy/constraint-transformer.tsLength of output: 1158
packages/runtime/src/enhancements/delegate.ts (5)
102-106: Ensure proper handling of logical operators in queries.The method
injectWhereHierarchycorrectly handles the recursion for logical operators ('AND', 'OR', 'NOT') in thewhereclause, which is crucial for maintaining the integrity of complex queries involving delegate models.
102-106: Validate the use of transactions increateMany.The use of transactions in the
createManymethod ensures atomicity when creating multiple records, which is a best practice for database operations involving multiple steps or records.
102-106: Confirm the conditional logic for updates involving base fields.The methods
updateandupdateManycorrectly handle conditional logic to determine if an update involves base fields, ensuring that updates are processed correctly depending on the complexity of the operation.
102-106: Ensure deletions are propagated correctly through the model hierarchy.The methods
deleteanddeleteManycorrectly ensure that deletions are propagated through the model hierarchy, which is crucial for maintaining data integrity when models are interconnected.
102-106: Validate error handling in aggregation methods for base model fields.The aggregation methods (
aggregate,count,groupBy) correctly handle errors when base model fields are used in contexts where they are not supported, preventing incorrect data aggregation and potential data integrity issues.packages/runtime/src/enhancements/policy/handler.ts (5)
5-5: New imports added forPandmatchfrom 'ts-pattern'.These imports are used for pattern matching in TypeScript, which is a common practice for type-safe code.
26-26: New import forCheckerConstrainttype.This type is likely used in the newly added
checkmethod to define constraints for policy checks.
28-28: Introduction ofConstraintSolverclass.This class is used in the new
checkmethod to evaluate policy constraints, which is a critical part of policy enforcement.
41-45: New type definition forPermissionCheckArgs.This type is used as the argument for the new
checkmethod, ensuring that the method's interface is clearly defined and type-safe.
1450-1556: Addition of a newcheckmethod to evaluate policy constraints without querying the database.This method enhances the policy system by allowing pre-checks of operations against policies, which can improve performance and security by preventing unnecessary database queries.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- packages/runtime/src/enhancements/policy/policy-utils.ts (7 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- packages/runtime/src/enhancements/policy/policy-utils.ts
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (8)
- packages/plugins/openapi/src/rpc-generator.ts (4 hunks)
- packages/plugins/swr/src/generator.ts (6 hunks)
- packages/plugins/tanstack-query/src/generator.ts (6 hunks)
- packages/plugins/trpc/src/generator.ts (6 hunks)
- packages/schema/src/plugins/zod/generator.ts (4 hunks)
- packages/schema/src/plugins/zod/transformer.ts (7 hunks)
- packages/sdk/src/prisma.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/sdk/src/utils.ts (6 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to errors (1)
- packages/plugins/swr/src/generator.ts (no review received)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (6)
- packages/plugins/openapi/src/rpc-generator.ts
- packages/plugins/tanstack-query/src/generator.ts
- packages/plugins/trpc/src/generator.ts
- packages/schema/src/plugins/zod/generator.ts
- packages/schema/src/plugins/zod/transformer.ts
- packages/sdk/src/utils.ts
Additional comments not posted (1)
packages/sdk/src/prisma.ts (1)
84-89: The implementation ofsupportCreateManycorrectly checks the Prisma version and data source provider to determine support for thecreateManyoperation.
No description provided.