chore: merge from dev

[ymc9]

No description provided.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The recent code updates enhance policy management and expression handling in a software system. Modifications include adding new parameters to improve post-update checks, refining expression context settings, and adjusting conditional logic for better authorization context handling. These changes aim to bolster schema loading and policy enforcement, particularly in scenarios involving updates.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
.../runtime/src/enhancements/policy/handler.ts	Updated _registerPostUpdateCheck function to include new parameters for better post-update checks.
.../schema/src/plugins/enhancer/policy/expression-writer.ts	Added a condition to set thisExprContext based on isPostGuard.
.../schema/src/plugins/enhancer/policy/policy-guard-generator.ts	Refined conditional checks in visit method and adjusted logic for isMemberAccessExpr.
.../sdk/src/typescript-expression-transformer.ts	Modified handling of MemberAccessExpr and adjusted isFutureExpr check.
tests/integration/tests/regression/issue-1235.test.ts	Introduced tests related to schema loading and policy enforcement for post updates.

---

Recent Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 482912b and 12b8ced.

Files selected for processing (5)

• packages/runtime/src/enhancements/policy/handler.ts (4 hunks)
• packages/schema/src/plugins/enhancer/policy/expression-writer.ts (1 hunks)
• packages/schema/src/plugins/enhancer/policy/policy-guard-generator.ts (2 hunks)
• packages/sdk/src/typescript-expression-transformer.ts (1 hunks)
• tests/integration/tests/regression/issue-1235.test.ts (1 hunks)

Additional comments not posted (8)

tests/integration/tests/regression/issue-1235.test.ts (2)

3-18: The test case regression1 correctly implements the policy check to deny updates where the id does not match, ensuring the integrity of the post updates.

---

20-34: The test case regression2 enhances the policy expression by using this.id, improving clarity and maintainability of the policy checks.

packages/sdk/src/typescript-expression-transformer.ts (1)

115-115: The modification to handle MemberAccessExpr with isFutureExpr under isPostGuard conditions correctly enforces the intended usage of future() in post-update rules, enhancing the robustness of policy checks.

packages/schema/src/plugins/enhancer/policy/expression-writer.ts (1)

78-79: The adjustment to thisExprContext in post-guard scenarios correctly references the pre-update state, ensuring accurate policy enforcement.

packages/schema/src/plugins/enhancer/policy/policy-guard-generator.ts (3)

552-554: Ensure correct handling of isThisExpr in policy rules.

Verification successful

---

The review comment focused on ensuring correct handling of isThisExpr in policy rules, particularly in the visit method of the PolicyGenerator class. The script output confirms that isThisExpr is indeed used in the visit method at line 552, as well as in other parts of the PolicyGenerator class (lines 497, 586, and 653). Each instance is part of a conditional check, which aligns with the intent to handle different scenarios where this expressions might affect the generation of policy guards.

Given this information, the handling of isThisExpr within the visit method and other related parts of the PolicyGenerator class appears to be implemented as described in the review comment. The usage of isThisExpr in conditional checks is consistent across multiple parts of the file, suggesting a deliberate approach to manage this expressions in policy rules.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify that `isThisExpr` is correctly handled in all policy rules.
ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'isThisExpr($_)'

Length of output: 2120

---

562-562: Review the handling of isReferenceExpr for correct policy rule application.

Verification successful

---

Based on the script output, the usage of isReferenceExpr within the policy rules in the policy-guard-generator.ts file and other related files has been confirmed. The function is utilized in various conditional checks and logical expressions, indicating that it is correctly handled for the application of policy rules. Therefore, the handling of isReferenceExpr in the context of policy rule application appears to be appropriate and consistent with the expected behavior.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify that `isReferenceExpr` is correctly handled in all policy rules.
ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'isReferenceExpr($_)'

Length of output: 4084

---

549-567: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [564-580]

Check the separation of conditions for isMemberAccessExpr to ensure they are correctly applied in the context of forAuthContext and isAuthInvocation.

Verification successful

---

The conditions within isMemberAccessExpr are correctly separated and applied in the context of forAuthContext and isAuthInvocation as per the provided code snippet in policy-guard-generator.ts. The script output confirms the presence of these conditions at the specified lines, and they align with the intended logic described in the review comment.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify that `isMemberAccessExpr` conditions are correctly separated and applied.
ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'isMemberAccessExpr($_)'

Length of output: 2576

packages/runtime/src/enhancements/policy/handler.ts (1)

644-662: The update to _registerPostUpdateCheck method correctly integrates the new parameters for enhanced post-update checks. Ensure that all calls to this method across the codebase are updated to pass the new parameters.

Verification successful

---

The calls to _registerPostUpdateCheck in various parts of the codebase appear to correctly use the new parameters preUpdateLookupFilter and postUpdateLookupFilter. Each instance adapts the arguments based on the specific needs of the operation, such as using the same filter before and after the update or differentiating them. This suggests that the method's integration is handled appropriately according to the changes described in the PR.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for all occurrences of `_registerPostUpdateCheck` to ensure they pass the new parameters.
rg --type ts '_registerPostUpdateCheck' -C 3

Length of output: 2570

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

Note: Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository by the repository owner. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.