Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(policy): optimize post-create read to only use id fields to find the created entity #1201

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 31, 2024

Conversation

ymc9
Copy link
Member

@ymc9 ymc9 commented Mar 31, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Updated the logic for post-create checks in policy handling to improve efficiency and accuracy.
  • New Features
    • Enhanced the method for extracting ID fields from entity data, providing a more streamlined approach.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 31, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The update involves refining the process of handling entity identification within the policy framework. Specifically, the addFluentSelect method was removed, and its responsibilities were integrated into the doFind method through the introduction of getIdFieldValues. This new method, added to the PolicyUtil class, focuses on extracting ID fields from entity data, thereby streamlining the post-create check process within the PolicyProxyHandler class.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.../policy/handler.ts Removed addFluentSelect and incorporated its functionality into doFind using getIdFieldValues for post-create checks.
.../policy/policy-utils.ts Added getIdFieldValues method to extract ID fields from entity data.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

Note: Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository by the repository owner. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Status

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ee3c716 and 04708b7.
Files selected for processing (2)
  • packages/runtime/src/enhancements/policy/handler.ts (2 hunks)
  • packages/runtime/src/enhancements/policy/policy-utils.ts (1 hunks)
Additional Context Used
Additional comments not posted (2)
packages/runtime/src/enhancements/policy/policy-utils.ts (1)

1241-1247: The implementation of getIdFieldValues method is concise and aligns with the objective of optimizing entity retrieval by focusing on ID fields. However, consider adding error handling or validation to ensure that the data argument contains the expected structure and fields. This can prevent potential runtime errors if data is missing required ID fields.

packages/runtime/src/enhancements/policy/handler.ts (1)

361-362: The introduction of getIdFieldValues in the doCreate method aligns with the PR's objective to optimize post-creation read processes by focusing on ID fields. This change effectively replaces the broader attribute selection with a more targeted approach, potentially improving performance and efficiency. Ensure that the getIdFieldValues method is thoroughly tested, especially in scenarios involving complex entities with nested ID fields.

@ymc9 ymc9 merged commit ee0166b into v2 Mar 31, 2024
12 checks passed
@ymc9 ymc9 deleted the refactor/post-create-read branch March 31, 2024 20:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant