Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(hooks): include delegate base models when calculating models affected by a mutation #1121

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 11, 2024

Conversation

ymc9
Copy link
Member

@ymc9 ymc9 commented Mar 11, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Clarified comments on base types in model metadata to exclude abstract base models.
    • Enhanced query analysis to recursively include delegate base models.
  • Chores
    • Removed unused logging functionality from the enhancement creation process.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 11, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The recent updates focus on refining the handling and inheritance of model information and enhancing query analysis in a runtime environment. Specifically, the updates clarify the handling of base types in model metadata, improve the process of identifying mutated models by incorporating delegate base models through recursive retrieval, and streamline the codebase by removing unnecessary logging functionality. These changes aim to improve the efficiency and clarity of the system's runtime behavior and data management.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.../src/cross/model-meta.ts Updated comment to clarify handling of abstract base models in ModelInfo type.
.../src/cross/query-analyzer.ts Enhanced getMutatedModels to include delegate base models recursively via getBaseRecursively. Added getBaseRecursively function for recursive base model retrieval.
.../src/enhancements/create-enhancement.ts Removed Logger import and usage, along with related logging statements.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

Note: Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository by the repository owner. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c0a9a02 and eee1d0e.
Files selected for processing (3)
  • packages/runtime/src/cross/model-meta.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/runtime/src/cross/query-analyzer.ts (3 hunks)
  • packages/runtime/src/enhancements/create-enhancement.ts (2 hunks)
Additional comments: 4
packages/runtime/src/cross/query-analyzer.ts (2)
  • 75-78: The addition of code to include delegate base models recursively in the getMutatedModels function is a significant improvement. Ensure that the getBaseRecursively function is thoroughly tested to prevent infinite loops and ensure all relevant base models are included.
  • 102-109: The implementation of getBaseRecursively to recursively include delegate base models is well-done. It's crucial to verify this function with various model configurations, including models without base types and models with multiple levels of inheritance, to ensure it behaves as expected.
packages/runtime/src/cross/model-meta.ts (1)
  • 121-121: The clarification in the comment regarding base types not including abstract base models is helpful for understanding the model metadata. Ensure that the system's behavior aligns with this clarification and that the exclusion of abstract base models is intentional and correctly implemented.
packages/runtime/src/enhancements/create-enhancement.ts (1)
  • 5-10: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1-1]

The removal of Logger usage and related logging statements aligns with the PR's objective to streamline the codebase. Ensure that critical information, especially for debugging, is still accessible through alternative means, such as console.warn for essential warnings.

@ymc9 ymc9 merged commit e34c530 into v2 Mar 11, 2024
13 checks passed
@ymc9 ymc9 deleted the fix/hooks-invalidation branch March 11, 2024 21:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant