Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: disallow extending from multiple delegate models #1117

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 13, 2024

Conversation

ymc9
Copy link
Member

@ymc9 ymc9 commented Mar 10, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced data model validation to prevent extending from multiple delegate models, ensuring more robust and error-free data structures.
  • Tests
    • Added test cases to verify the new validation rule against multiple delegate model extensions.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 10, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The recent update introduces a validation mechanism within the DataModelValidator to prevent models from extending multiple delegate models. This enhancement ensures that each model adheres to a single inheritance principle concerning delegate base types. Additionally, the validation process is rigorously tested through a new test case designed to verify the correct identification and handling of errors when a model attempts to extend more than one delegate model.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.../language-server/validator/datamodel-validator.ts Added validateBaseDelegateModel method to check for multiple delegate model extensions in superTypes.
.../tests/schema/validation/datamodel-validation.test.ts New test case added to validate error handling for multiple delegate model extensions.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

Note: Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository by the repository owner. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c0a9a02 and e381e5c.
Files selected for processing (2)
  • packages/schema/src/language-server/validator/datamodel-validator.ts (2 hunks)
  • packages/schema/tests/schema/validation/datamodel-validation.test.ts (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 3
packages/schema/src/language-server/validator/datamodel-validator.ts (2)
  • 401-408: The implementation of validateBaseDelegateModel correctly enforces the new rule against extending multiple delegate models. The method is well-integrated within the validate method, ensuring that this validation check is part of the overall model validation process.
  • 25-25: The integration of validateBaseDelegateModel within the validate method is correctly positioned, ensuring that the new validation rule is applied as part of the overall model validation sequence.
packages/schema/tests/schema/validation/datamodel-validation.test.ts (1)
  • 718-740: The new test case delegate base type correctly verifies the behavior of extending from multiple delegate models. It effectively tests the new validation rule, ensuring that the expected error is triggered and reported.

@ymc9 ymc9 merged commit a662107 into v2 Mar 13, 2024
13 checks passed
@ymc9 ymc9 deleted the fix/multi-delegate-inheritance branch March 13, 2024 16:08
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Mar 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant