Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: try out release flow #1023

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 21, 2024
Merged

chore: try out release flow #1023

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 21, 2024

Conversation

ymc9
Copy link
Member

@ymc9 ymc9 commented Feb 21, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Refined GitHub workflow triggers and permissions for CodeQL analysis.
    • Updated workflow configuration for changelog management, including branch triggers and permissions.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 21, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The recent updates focus on refining GitHub Actions workflows, specifically targeting the CodeQL analysis and management changelog configurations. These adjustments enhance the efficiency and security of the workflows by tweaking event triggers, permissions, and job structures. Additionally, the updates bring in newer versions of tools and actions, ensuring the workflows are up-to-date and optimized for current project needs.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.github/workflows/codeql.yml Adjusted workflow triggers, permissions, job configurations, and steps for improved CodeQL analysis
.github/workflows/.../management-changelog.yml Updated on section for branch triggers, permissions, and steps in the release job; added v2 branch trigger and updated permissions syntax and actions used

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

@ymc9 ymc9 merged commit 889b7d9 into v2 Feb 21, 2024
7 checks passed
@ymc9 ymc9 deleted the chore/test-ci branch February 21, 2024 03:39
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 1

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 252151c and 253959c.
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package.json is excluded by: !**/*.json
Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/codeql.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/management-changelog.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 12
.github/workflows/management-changelog.yml (7)
  • 2-7: The addition of the v2 branch as a trigger ensures that changes made to this branch will also initiate the changelog management workflow. This is a positive change for integrating temporary or experimental branches into the release process.
  • 10-10: The permissions setting to contents: read at the workflow level is appropriate, ensuring that the workflow has the necessary permissions to read the repository content without granting excessive permissions.
  • 16-18: The job-specific permissions are correctly scoped to contents: write and pull-requests: write, which are necessary for the release job to update the repository and manage pull requests. This fine-grained permission control enhances security by limiting the actions that can be performed by the workflow.
  • 20-20: The use of GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.BOT_TOKEN || github.token }} provides flexibility in authentication by allowing the use of a bot token if available, or defaulting to the GitHub-provided token. This approach supports scenarios where enhanced permissions or a specific identity for automation is required.
  • 23-27: The inclusion of the Harden Runner step with egress-policy: audit is a good security practice, providing runtime security for the workflow environment. This step helps in auditing outbound traffic, which can be crucial for identifying and mitigating potential security risks.
  • 37-44: The configuration for release-please-action includes a dynamic target-branch determination based on the branch name (dev or others). This flexibility ensures that the release process is correctly targeted based on the branch context, which is crucial for maintaining separate release flows for development and stable branches.
  • 45-60: The conditional execution of steps based on release_created output and the use of pnpm for package management are well-structured. However, it's important to ensure that the NODE_AUTH_TOKEN is securely managed and that pnpm publish-test aligns with the project's release strategy, especially in a testing or experimental workflow.
.github/workflows/codeql.yml (5)
  • 4-18: The expanded triggers for push, pull_request, and scheduled runs (cron) ensure comprehensive coverage for CodeQL analysis across different branches (main, dev, release/*, v2) and scheduled intervals. This broadens the security analysis to more development activities and schedules, enhancing the project's security posture.
  • 21-21: Setting contents: read at the workflow level is appropriate for CodeQL analysis, ensuring the workflow has read access to the repository's code without unnecessary permissions.
  • 25-28: The job-specific permissions are well-defined, granting actions: read, contents: read, and security-events: write. This setup allows the workflow to read actions and contents, and write security events, aligning with the requirements for a comprehensive code analysis and reporting process.
  • 32-37: The strategy configuration with fail-fast: false and a matrix for javascript and typescript languages ensures that CodeQL analysis is thorough and continues even if an error occurs in one of the matrix jobs. This approach is beneficial for projects with multiple languages, ensuring all parts are analyzed.
  • 39-43: Including the Harden Runner step with egress-policy: audit in the CodeQL workflow is a proactive security measure, similar to its use in the changelog management workflow. This consistency in applying security measures across workflows is commendable.

Comment on lines +45 to +75
- name: Checkout repository
uses: actions/checkout@f43a0e5ff2bd294095638e18286ca9a3d1956744 # v3.6.0

# Initializes the CodeQL tools for scanning.
- name: Initialize CodeQL
uses: github/codeql-action/[email protected]
with:
languages: ${{ matrix.language }}
# If you wish to specify custom queries, you can do so here or in a config file.
# By default, queries listed here will override any specified in a config file.
# Prefix the list here with "+" to use these queries and those in the config file.
# Initializes the CodeQL tools for scanning.
- name: Initialize CodeQL
uses: github/codeql-action/[email protected]
with:
languages: ${{ matrix.language }}
# If you wish to specify custom queries, you can do so here or in a config file.
# By default, queries listed here will override any specified in a config file.
# Prefix the list here with "+" to use these queries and those in the config file.

# Autobuild attempts to build any compiled languages (C/C++, C#, or Java).
# If this step fails, then you should remove it and run the build manually (see below)
- name: Autobuild
uses: github/codeql-action/autobuild@1500a131381b66de0c52ac28abb13cd79f4b7ecc # v2.22.12
# Autobuild attempts to build any compiled languages (C/C++, C#, or Java).
# If this step fails, then you should remove it and run the build manually (see below)
- name: Autobuild
uses: github/codeql-action/[email protected]

# ℹ️ Command-line programs to run using the OS shell.
# 📚 See https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions#jobsjob_idstepsrun
# ℹ️ Command-line programs to run using the OS shell.
# 📚 See https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions#jobsjob_idstepsrun

# If the Autobuild fails above, remove it and uncomment the following three lines.
# modify them (or add more) to build your code if your project, please refer to the EXAMPLE below for guidance.
# If the Autobuild fails above, remove it and uncomment the following three lines.
# modify them (or add more) to build your code if your project, please refer to the EXAMPLE below for guidance.

# - run: |
# echo "Run, Build Application using script"
# ./location_of_script_within_repo/buildscript.sh
# - run: |
# echo "Run, Build Application using script"
# ./location_of_script_within_repo/buildscript.sh

- name: Perform CodeQL Analysis
uses: github/codeql-action/analyze@1500a131381b66de0c52ac28abb13cd79f4b7ecc # v2.22.12
with:
category: "/language:${{matrix.language}}"
- name: Perform CodeQL Analysis
uses: github/codeql-action/[email protected]
with:
category: '/language:${{matrix.language}}'
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The use of specific versions for actions like checkout, codeql-action/init, codeql-action/autobuild, and codeql-action/analyze ensures stability and predictability in the workflow execution. However, it's important to periodically review and update these versions to incorporate improvements and security patches.

Consider setting up a periodic review process to ensure action versions used in the workflow are up-to-date, balancing stability with the benefits of new features and security enhancements.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant