Add page for Zarr implementations

[MSanKeys963]

Linking this from #80.

Added a new page for the Zarr implementations. After merging this PR, it can be accessed at https://zarr.dev/implementations.

Thanks, @joshmoore, for helping me with this.

Let me know what you all think; suggestions are welcome. Thanks!

[joshmoore]

Built locally. (Sidenote: I recently migrated https://ngff.openmicroscopy.org/ away from GH Pages and to RTD in order to be able to review PRs)

One additional observation: the side TOC is getting hard to visually parse:

Specification
Description
Applications
Adopters
Office Hours
Features
Implementations
Sponsorship
Slides
Videos
ZEPs
Community
Blog

Time to go alphabetical? Perhaps bring back the split but call it "Subpages" rather than "other sites".

[MSanKeys963]

Thanks for the feedback, @joshmoore.

Sidenote: I recently migrated https://ngff.openmicroscopy.org/ away from GH Pages and to RTD in order to be able to review PRs

Interesting. Does that mean RTD would be able to render the minimal-mistakes theme or it would build the page in RTD default theme only?

This is what the implementations page and sidebar currently look like:

Let me know if there are any more suggestions.

[joshmoore]

Interesting. Does that mean RTD would be able to render the minimal-mistakes theme or it would build the page in RTD default theme only?

I imagine so, but I did not try that.

sidebar currently look like:

Looks more usable to me. What do you think?

implementations page

Interesting. I was thinking a table like this:

| Name     | Language | Something else (stars? link?) |
|----------|----------|-------------------------------|
| NetCDF-C | C        | establied 1999                |
| GDAL     | C++      |                               |
| JZarr    | Java     |                               |
| etc      |          |                               |

but this would work, too. Readability should probably be the top prio.

[MSanKeys963]

I imagine so, but I did not try that.

I lightly doubt it. Maybe RTD can render sphinx-themes only?

Looks more usable to me. What do you think?

Yes, looks good.

I was thinking a table like this:

I tried doing something like this, but the minimal-mistakes theme has limited horizontal space, and it gets crumbled when you try to fit in too much.
I suggest going ahead with this for now, and then we can add more stuff later by switching themes.

[joshmoore]

Maybe RTD can render sphinx-themes only?

Definitely not. You do have to install the package though.

I suggest going ahead with this for now, and then we can add more stuff later by switching themes.

👍

[MSanKeys963]

Definitely not. You do have to install the package though.

I see. I'll look into this further.

Merging this for now. 🚀