Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

43: Test ci status badge #45

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 26, 2024
Merged

43: Test ci status badge #45

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 26, 2024

Conversation

jac18281828
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@jac18281828 jac18281828 requested a review from insipx January 25, 2024 23:20
@jac18281828 jac18281828 self-assigned this Jan 25, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 25, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (2b2bf95) 78.94% compared to head (95c0d65) 78.94%.

❗ Current head 95c0d65 differs from pull request most recent head ce75da2. Consider uploading reports for the commit ce75da2 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #45   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   78.94%   78.94%           
=======================================
  Files           9        9           
  Lines         114      114           
=======================================
  Hits           90       90           
  Misses         24       24           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@jac18281828 jac18281828 force-pushed the jac/codecov branch 2 times, most recently from 7da8f17 to 0cd0aaa Compare January 26, 2024 02:35
@jac18281828 jac18281828 merged commit ce75da2 into main Jan 26, 2024
3 checks passed
@jac18281828 jac18281828 deleted the jac/codecov branch January 26, 2024 02:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants