Upgrade dependencies #722
Upgrade dependencies #722
Conversation
|
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe pull request includes updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Deploying xmtp-js-docs with
|
| Latest commit: |
63e5276
|
| Status: | ⚡️ Build in progress... |
rygine
force-pushed
the
rygine/up-deps
branch
from
8a3ca1a to
a3c3bf0
Compare
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
examples/react-vite-browser-sdk/src/createClient.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-23: Consider enhancing error handling for SDK initializationWhile the code handles encryption key validation, it might benefit from additional error handling around client creation, especially since this is example code that others might reference.
Consider wrapping the client creation in a try-catch block:
export const createClient = async (walletKey: string) => { const encryptionKeyHex = import.meta.env.VITE_ENCRYPTION_KEY; if (!encryptionKeyHex) { throw new Error("VITE_ENCRYPTION_KEY must be set in the environment"); } const encryptionBytes = toBytes(encryptionKeyHex); const wallet = createWallet(walletKey); const signer: Signer = { getAddress: () => wallet.account.address, signMessage: async (message: string) => { const signature = await wallet.signMessage({ message, }); return toBytes(signature); }, }; - const client = await Client.create(signer, encryptionBytes); - return client; + try { + const client = await Client.create(signer, encryptionBytes); + return client; + } catch (error) { + throw new Error(`Failed to initialize XMTP client: ${error.message}`); + } };sdks/browser-sdk/README.md (2)
29-33: Enhance the headers documentation with context and examplesWhile the header configurations are correct, consider adding:
- An explanation of why these headers are required (likely related to WASM and SharedArrayBuffer support)
- More guidance on the Next.js path pattern configuration:
- Examples of common path patterns
- When to use specific patterns (e.g., for specific routes vs. all routes)
Also applies to: 43-63
69-85: Expand bundler configuration documentationThe WASM bundling section could be improved by adding:
- Configuration examples for other popular bundlers (webpack, Rollup)
- Common troubleshooting steps or issues
- A brief explanation of why
@xmtp/wasm-bindingsneeds to be excluded from optimization
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (16)
content-types/content-type-group-updated/package.json(1 hunks)content-types/content-type-primitives/package.json(1 hunks)content-types/content-type-remote-attachment/package.json(1 hunks)content-types/content-type-reply/package.json(1 hunks)examples/react-vite-browser-sdk/package.json(1 hunks)examples/react-vite-browser-sdk/src/App.tsx(1 hunks)examples/react-vite-browser-sdk/src/createClient.ts(1 hunks)packages/consent-proof-signature/package.json(1 hunks)packages/frames-client/package.json(2 hunks)packages/frames-validator/package.json(2 hunks)sdks/browser-sdk/README.md(1 hunks)sdks/browser-sdk/package.json(1 hunks)sdks/js-sdk/package.json(2 hunks)sdks/js-sdk/rollup.config.js(1 hunks)sdks/node-sdk/README.md(1 hunks)sdks/node-sdk/package.json(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- examples/react-vite-browser-sdk/src/App.tsx
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (10)
- content-types/content-type-group-updated/package.json
- content-types/content-type-primitives/package.json
- content-types/content-type-remote-attachment/package.json
- content-types/content-type-reply/package.json
- packages/consent-proof-signature/package.json
- packages/frames-client/package.json
- packages/frames-validator/package.json
- sdks/browser-sdk/package.json
- sdks/js-sdk/package.json
- sdks/node-sdk/package.json
🔇 Additional comments (9)
examples/react-vite-browser-sdk/src/createClient.ts (1)
21-21: Verify SDK changes and update documentation if needed
The removal of the env parameter from Client.create appears to be related to the @xmtp/browser-sdk upgrade. This change in the API signature could affect other implementations.
Let's verify the changes and documentation:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now provide a conclusive response about the API changes:
Client.create API change is a documented breaking change
The removal of the env parameter from Client.create is a documented breaking change in both browser-sdk and node-sdk. According to the changelogs:
Client.createwas refactored to accept aSignerinstead of account address- Client creation now automatically handles registration and identity
- A new
disableAutoRegisteroption was added toClientOptions
The changes in the example are correct and align with the SDK's latest API design.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for breaking changes in SDK and verify documentation
# Look for other instances of Client.create to ensure consistent updates
# and check for documentation/migration guides
# Search for other Client.create usage patterns
rg -A 2 "Client\.create"
# Look for README or migration guide
fd -g "README*" -g "MIGRATION*" -g "CHANGELOG*"
Length of output: 17516
examples/react-vite-browser-sdk/package.json (4)
25-26: LGTM: Build tool updates
The updates to build tools (@vitejs/plugin-react, autoprefixer, vite) are minor version bumps and should maintain compatibility.
Also applies to: 31-31
27-28: Review breaking changes in postcss-preset-env
The update to postcss-preset-env (9.x -> 10.x) is a major version bump that may include breaking changes.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for breaking changes in postcss-preset-env
# Check release notes for breaking changes
echo "Checking postcss-preset-env changes between 9.x and 10.x"
gh api repos/csstools/postcss-plugins/releases | jq -r '.[] | select(.tag_name | startswith("postcss-preset-env-10")) | .body'23-24: Verify TypeScript version compatibility
The TypeScript ecosystem updates (@types/react, @types/react-dom, typescript) should be verified for compatibility with the React version in use.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check TypeScript and @types compatibility
# Check TypeScript release notes for breaking changes
echo "Checking TypeScript changes between 5.5.3 and 5.6.3"
gh api repos/microsoft/TypeScript/releases | jq -r '.[] | select(.tag_name | startswith("v5.")) | .body'
# Verify @types versions match React version
npm info react@^18.3.1 version
npm info @types/react@^18.3.12 versionAlso applies to: 30-30
13-15: Verify compatibility between Web3 dependencies
The updates to Web3-related packages (@rainbow-me/rainbowkit, @wagmi/core, wagmi) are interconnected. While these are minor version bumps, it's important to verify compatibility.
Also applies to: 20-20
✅ Verification successful
Based on the execution results, I can now provide a final response:
Web3 dependencies are compatible and safe to update
The version updates for @rainbow-me/rainbowkit (2.1.3 → 2.2.0), @wagmi/core (2.11.7 → 2.14.6), and @tanstack/react-query (5.51.1 → 5.60.5) are all compatible:
- @rainbow-me/rainbowkit 2.2.0 requires wagmi ^2.9.0 and @tanstack/react-query >=5.0.0, which are satisfied by the updated versions
- The @tanstack/react-query updates (5.51.1 → 5.60.5) contain only bug fixes and improvements with no breaking changes
- All version bumps are within the same major version, following semver
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for breaking changes and compatibility issues in the updated packages
# Check release notes for breaking changes
echo "Checking @rainbow-me/rainbowkit changes between 2.1.3 and 2.2.0"
gh api repos/rainbow-me/rainbowkit/releases | jq -r '.[] | select(.tag_name | startswith("v2.")) | .body'
echo "Checking @tanstack/react-query changes between 5.51.1 and 5.60.5"
gh api repos/TanStack/query/releases | jq -r '.[] | select(.tag_name | startswith("v5.")) | .body'
# Verify peer dependency requirements
npm info @rainbow-me/rainbowkit@^2.2.0 peerDependencies
npm info wagmi@^2.12.33 peerDependencies
Length of output: 22425
sdks/node-sdk/README.md (1)
15-15: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Verify the glibc requirement and provide more context
The addition of this system requirement needs verification and more context:
- Ubuntu 24.04 is not yet released as of April 2024
- The requirement for glibc 3.28+ seems unusually high and could significantly limit adoption
Let's verify if this requirement is actually needed:
Consider enhancing the documentation:
- Add an explanation of why this high glibc version is required
- List alternative distributions that meet this requirement
- Document the impact on existing users
- Consider adding a compatibility matrix
- `glibc` 3.28+ (i.e. Ubuntu 24.04 or later)
+- `glibc` 3.28+ (required for [explain feature/dependency])
+ - Compatible with: [list other distributions]
+ - If you can't upgrade, please see [workaround/alternative]sdks/js-sdk/rollup.config.js (2)
Line range hint 1-99: Build configuration structure is well-organized
The Rollup configuration follows best practices with:
- Clear separation of build targets (ES, CJS, d.ts, browser, bundler)
- Proper source map generation
- Environment-specific resolution via the
.browserand.bundlerextensions - Appropriate plugin usage for each build target
11-11: Verify crypto module handling across different build targets
The addition of "node:crypto" alongside the existing "crypto" external dependency requires careful consideration:
- The
node:prefix is Node.js-specific and might not be compatible with browser environments - Having both
"node:crypto"and"crypto"as externals could lead to inconsistent module resolution
Let's verify the crypto module usage across the codebase:
Consider:
- Using conditional exports in package.json to handle different environments
- Implementing environment-specific crypto implementations using the existing
.browserand.bundlerresolution mechanism
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now generate a final response as we have sufficient information about how crypto is used across the codebase.
Both node:crypto and crypto externals are correctly configured
The codebase shows a consistent pattern where:
- Node.js specific imports use
node:cryptoprefix:import { webcrypto } from "node:crypto" - The crypto implementation is properly abstracted in
src/encryption/crypto.tswhich handles the Node.js case - All other files import from this abstraction layer:
import { crypto } from "@/encryption"
Having both externals in the Rollup config is correct because:
"node:crypto"handles the Node.js environment"crypto"handles other environments where the module might be available without the prefix
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check how crypto is imported/used across the codebase
# Check for crypto imports
echo "Checking crypto imports:"
rg -A 2 "import.*crypto" --type ts
# Check for dynamic crypto imports
echo -e "\nChecking dynamic crypto imports:"
rg -A 2 "require.*crypto" --type ts
# Check for Node.js-specific imports
echo -e "\nChecking Node.js-specific imports:"
rg -A 2 "node:crypto" --type ts
Length of output: 20259
sdks/browser-sdk/README.md (1)
Line range hint 1-85: Documentation updates align well with dependency changes
The documentation changes appropriately reflect the dependency upgrades mentioned in the PR objectives, particularly the Vite configuration updates and WASM bundling instructions.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
89-89: null
Emphasis used instead of a heading
(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)
Summary
@xmtp/protoSummary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores