-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 76
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: code fixing, remove redundant and add missing #880
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #880 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 75.55% 75.21% -0.35%
==========================================
Files 180 190 +10
Lines 26938 28480 +1542
Branches 26938 28480 +1542
==========================================
+ Hits 20353 21420 +1067
- Misses 5366 5761 +395
- Partials 1219 1299 +80 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
@bsbds Please take at a look. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. Please initiate a pr to the xline-proto repo and squash these commits
rebased. and proto has been updated in #903 . |
@lxl66566 Convert your pr to draft since CI failed |
@lxl66566 Convert your pr to draft since CI failed |
15b13bf
to
67ba153
Compare
@lxl66566 Convert your pr to draft since CI failed |
@lxl66566 Your PR is in conflict and cannot be merged. |
This PR is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 14 days |
@lxl66566 Convert your pr to draft since CI failed |
Signed-off-by: lxl66566 <[email protected]> chore(curp): add a missing testcase to lib.rs Signed-off-by: lxl66566 <[email protected]> chore(raw_curp): trivial change to functional expression Signed-off-by: lxl66566 <[email protected]>
Please briefly answer these questions:
what problem are you trying to solve? (or if there's no problem, what's the motivation for this change?)
.field
inKvClient
andLeaseClient
what changes does this pull request make?
.field
inKvClient
andLeaseClient
quorum_should_work()
test, corresponding to the above node(10).raw_curp/log.rs
are there any non-obvious implications of these changes? (does it break compatibility with previous versions, etc)