Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: added eslint checks for ui #244

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Feb 19, 2024
Merged

ci: added eslint checks for ui #244

merged 7 commits into from
Feb 19, 2024

Conversation

raaymax
Copy link
Collaborator

@raaymax raaymax commented Feb 15, 2024

On previous PR we lost some time fixing issues that should be handled by linter.
I checked and noticed that eslint was not working in the project so i fixed it.
Additionally added GH actions workflow for lint checking

@ramedina86
Copy link
Collaborator

Sounds great, @FabienArcellier thoughts?

@raaymax What were the issues from the previous PR that the linter would have caught? (just curious)

@raaymax
Copy link
Collaborator Author

raaymax commented Feb 15, 2024

Now as I review this PR, there isn't really much there. Actually, just console.log. Anyway, in the meantime, I fixed more things on my own, which is why it seemed like there was more.

@raaymax
Copy link
Collaborator Author

raaymax commented Feb 15, 2024

From all this changes I only added missing :key bindings in v-for directives and some ignore comments. The rest was made by eslint . --fix

@ramedina86
Copy link
Collaborator

Hey @raaymax are we good to merge this?

@raaymax
Copy link
Collaborator Author

raaymax commented Feb 19, 2024

If @FabienArcellier doesn't have any more comments, then yes.

@ramedina86 ramedina86 merged commit 7f6815e into writer:dev Feb 19, 2024
12 checks passed
@raaymax raaymax deleted the eslint-fix branch February 20, 2024 08:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants