-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 88
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implemented WOLFSSH_FTP_FSETSTAT #551
Merged
ejohnstown
merged 4 commits into
wolfSSL:master
from
falemagn:pull-reqs/cca01a4_WOLFSSH_FTP_FSETSTAT
Sep 15, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
3d6dfb3
WOLFSSH_FTP_FSETSTAT
falemagn cc5a037
make new internal function use WOLFSSL_LOCAL
JacobBarthelmeh d84e3b3
Merge branch 'master' into pull-reqs/cca01a4_WOLFSSH_FTP_FSETSTAT
JacobBarthelmeh ef39490
additional sanity check on input buffer size
JacobBarthelmeh File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can maxSz be less than 4?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I assume you're referring to the line below the one you've commented on.
maxSz
is a parameter of the function, and it's basically the size of the buffer, as far as I can tell. It's the same kind of code that is used throughout thewolfsftp.c
file and, indeed, the code I suppose you're referring to has been copied and pasted from other functions that need to get the file handle, which predate this PR, likewolfSSH_SFTP_RecvClose
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The line I commented is pulling 4 bytes of data from the buffer.
If the maxSz is guaranteed to be more than 4 bytes, then you don't need a check to whether the buffer is big enough. Otherwise a check is needed to ensure there are 4 bytes to read.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I understand now. If that were an issue, then it would be an issue also in wolfSSH_SFTP_RecvClose and all other functions that do the same thing. I didn't delve into the code that deep, I just assumed that if it's correct elsewhere, then it's correct there, given that the way it gets there is the same as for all the other functions.