Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify what a status is #1159

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 1, 2021
Merged

Clarify what a status is #1159

merged 3 commits into from
Feb 1, 2021

Conversation

annevk
Copy link
Member

@annevk annevk commented Feb 1, 2021

Tests: web-platform-tests/wpt#27421.

Follow-up: #1156.

Closes #1142.

cc @tabatkins @MattMenke2

(See WHATWG Working Mode: Changes for more details.)


💥 Error: 500 Internal Server Error 💥

PR Preview failed to build. (Last tried on Feb 1, 2021, 5:20 PM UTC).

More

PR Preview relies on a number of web services to run. There seems to be an issue with the following one:

🚨 CSS Spec Preprocessor - CSS Spec Preprocessor is the web service used to build Bikeshed specs.

🔗 Related URL

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN">
<html><head>
<title>500 Internal Server Error</title>
</head><body>
<h1>Internal Server Error</h1>
<p>The server encountered an internal error or
misconfiguration and was unable to complete
your request.</p>
<p>Please contact the server administrator at 
 [no address given] to inform them of the time this error occurred,
 and the actions you performed just before this error.</p>
<p>More information about this error may be available
in the server error log.</p>
<hr>
<address>Apache/2.4.10 (Debian) Server at api.csswg.org Port 443</address>
</body></html>

If you don't have enough information above to solve the error by yourself (or to understand to which web service the error is related to, if any), please file an issue.

fetch.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
fetch.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@tabatkins
Copy link
Contributor

r+ from my perspective

@MattMenke2
Copy link
Contributor

Looks good to me as well.

annevk added a commit to web-platform-tests/wpt that referenced this pull request Feb 1, 2021
@annevk annevk merged commit cb8995b into main Feb 1, 2021
@annevk annevk deleted the annevk/status branch February 1, 2021 17:23
moz-v2v-gh pushed a commit to mozilla/gecko-dev that referenced this pull request Feb 2, 2021
Automatic update from web-platform-tests
HTTP/1 status code tests

For whatwg/fetch#1142 and whatwg/fetch#1159.
--

wpt-commits: a0ff0251fc21d0acd2e2443a033b390f44399b43
wpt-pr: 27421
gecko-dev-updater pushed a commit to marco-c/gecko-dev-wordified-and-comments-removed that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2021
Automatic update from web-platform-tests
HTTP/1 status code tests

For whatwg/fetch#1142 and whatwg/fetch#1159.
--

wpt-commits: a0ff0251fc21d0acd2e2443a033b390f44399b43
wpt-pr: 27421

UltraBlame original commit: 5eee1e3543982e0b2782b3fe9dda6cd64f59e0c5
gecko-dev-updater pushed a commit to marco-c/gecko-dev-comments-removed that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2021
Automatic update from web-platform-tests
HTTP/1 status code tests

For whatwg/fetch#1142 and whatwg/fetch#1159.
--

wpt-commits: a0ff0251fc21d0acd2e2443a033b390f44399b43
wpt-pr: 27421

UltraBlame original commit: 5eee1e3543982e0b2782b3fe9dda6cd64f59e0c5
gecko-dev-updater pushed a commit to marco-c/gecko-dev-wordified that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2021
Automatic update from web-platform-tests
HTTP/1 status code tests

For whatwg/fetch#1142 and whatwg/fetch#1159.
--

wpt-commits: a0ff0251fc21d0acd2e2443a033b390f44399b43
wpt-pr: 27421

UltraBlame original commit: 5eee1e3543982e0b2782b3fe9dda6cd64f59e0c5
jamienicol pushed a commit to jamienicol/gecko that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2021
Automatic update from web-platform-tests
HTTP/1 status code tests

For whatwg/fetch#1142 and whatwg/fetch#1159.
--

wpt-commits: a0ff0251fc21d0acd2e2443a033b390f44399b43
wpt-pr: 27421
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

"A status is a code" doesn't actually mean anything
4 participants