Unskip several tests #4
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
kertal
commented
Dec 29, 2023
Comment on lines
+95
to
+98
| ], | ||
| [ | ||
| "order_id", | ||
| "desc" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@wayneseymour with this change the sort order is now stable, however, it's different than before, so snapshots had to be re-generated
wayneseymour
approved these changes
Dec 29, 2023
|
/ci |
wayneseymour
merged commit 88ee17d
into
wayneseymour:esarch-fixed-higher-watermark-impl-minimal-code-chages-without-benchmark-tool
1 of 2 checks passed
wayneseymour
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 16, 2025
…re replacements (elastic#206660) ## Summary Today, when a developer deprecates a feature and replaces its privileges with those of another feature, we reasonably assume that the new feature fully replaces the old one in all possible contexts - whether in role management UIs or in the Spaces feature toggles visibility UI. However, when deprecated privileges are replaced by the privileges of multiple features, such as in [this case](elastic#202863 (comment)) where the Discover/Dashboard/Maps feature privileges are replaced by the privileges of Discover_v2/Dashboard_v2/Maps_v2, respectively, **and** the privileges of the Saved Query Management feature, the choice is ambiguous. Which of these features should be treated as the replacement for the deprecated feature in contexts that deal with entire features (like the Spaces feature toggles visibility UI) rather than individual privileges (like in role management UIs)? Should all referenced features be considered replacements? Or just a subset - or even a single feature? If so, which one? Currently, we treat all referenced features as replacements for the deprecated feature, which creates problems, as described in detail in [this discussion](elastic#202863 (comment)). This PR allows developers to customize this behavior by specifying which features Kibana should treat as direct successors to deprecated features in contexts that deal with whole features rather than individual privileges: ```ts deps.features.registerKibanaFeature({ deprecated: { notice: 'The feature is deprecated because … well, there’s a reason.', --> replacedBy: ['feature_id_v2'], <-- }, id: 'feature_id' name: `Case #4 feature ${suffix} (DEPRECATED)`, … }); ``` ## How to test 1. Run test server ```bash node scripts/functional_tests_server.js --config x-pack/test/security_api_integration/features.config.ts ``` 2. Execute the following request from the Dev Tools (`case_4_feature_a` is a deprecated feature that is replaced by multiple features and **doesn't use** `deprecated.replacedBy`) ```http PUT kbn:/api/spaces/space/default?overwrite=true { "id":"default", "name":"Default", "description":"This is your default space!", "color":"#00bfb3", "disabledFeatures":["case_4_feature_a"], "_reserved":true, "imageUrl":"", "initials":"D" } ``` 3. Observe that in response deprecated `case_4_feature_a` is replaced by two features (you can also check http://localhost:5620/app/management/kibana/spaces/edit/default to see how it's reflected in UI) ```http { "id": "default", "name": "Default", "description": "This is your default space!", "color": "#00bfb3", "initials": "D", "imageUrl": "", "disabledFeatures": [ "case_4_feature_a_v2", "case_4_feature_c" ], "_reserved": true } ``` 4. Execute the following request from the Dev Tools (`case_4_feature_b` is a deprecated feature that is replaced by multiple features, but **uses** `deprecated.replacedBy` to set the conceptual feature-successor) ```http PUT kbn:/api/spaces/space/default?overwrite=true { "id":"default", "name":"Default", "description":"This is your default space!", "color":"#00bfb3", "disabledFeatures":["case_4_feature_b"], "_reserved":true, "imageUrl":"", "initials":"D" } ``` 5. Observe that in response deprecated `case_4_feature_b` is replaced by a single feature (you can also check http://localhost:5620/app/management/kibana/spaces/edit/default to see how it's reflected in UI) ```http { "id": "default", "name": "Default", "description": "This is your default space!", "color": "#00bfb3", "initials": "D", "imageUrl": "", "disabledFeatures": [ "case_4_feature_b_v2" ], "_reserved": true } ``` __Required by:__ elastic#202863 (comment) //cc @davismcphee
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This PR unskips several tests broken due to concurrent ingestion, causing problems with sorting when timestamps were the same. I've added another field to sort by (order_id) to fix this, and the snapshot tests then had to be fixed.
Checklist