You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, the Reorganize action will only sort objects by their object type. It would be very useful if it was possible to specify the path used for sorting in the same way we can specify the name used for renaming extension objects.
In essence, the default path - assuming it is the same as it is now - would be <ObjectType>/<Filename>, but you could change it to something like <Prefix>/<ObjectTypeShortPascalCase>/<Filename>.
It would be especially useful if it could read metadata such as a comment before the object definition (maybe a doc comment like /// <section>Sales</section>), which would allow for specifying subfolders in the object without affecting the code.
This feature would make reorganizing with custom source structure possible, and automate the management required.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, the Reorganize action will only sort objects by their object type. It would be very useful if it was possible to specify the path used for sorting in the same way we can specify the name used for renaming extension objects.
In essence, the default path - assuming it is the same as it is now - would be
<ObjectType>/<Filename>
, but you could change it to something like<Prefix>/<ObjectTypeShortPascalCase>/<Filename>
.It would be especially useful if it could read metadata such as a comment before the object definition (maybe a doc comment like
/// <section>Sales</section>
), which would allow for specifying subfolders in the object without affecting the code.This feature would make reorganizing with custom source structure possible, and automate the management required.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: