Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Security and Privacy Considerations #113

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Feb 22, 2021
Merged

Security and Privacy Considerations #113

merged 6 commits into from
Feb 22, 2021

Conversation

mmccool
Copy link
Contributor

@mmccool mmccool commented Feb 3, 2021

Adding additional content to the Security and Privacy Considerations section.
See issue #67 and issue w3c/wot-security#196


Preview | Diff

@mmccool mmccool marked this pull request as ready for review February 16, 2021 00:58
@mmccool mmccool changed the title WIP: Security and Privacy Considerations Security and Privacy Considerations Feb 16, 2021
@mmccool
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmccool commented Feb 16, 2021

Marked as not-WIP however at present I only have two risks: DDoS and location tracking. Suggestions for other risks welcome. Certain issues mentioned in the above-linked issues should be dealt with elsewhere in the document. For example, JSON path injection attacks should be designed out by limiting the features that can be used in JS embedded in JSON path queries.

@mmccool
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmccool commented Feb 22, 2021

  • Access controls for explicit location data should me mentioned
  • Negative location inferencing can be mitigated by having long time to live (e.g. one month in the home use case)
  • We should consider things/ask PING what they would likely be concerned about

@mmccool
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmccool commented Feb 22, 2021

Comment:

  • Peer-to-Peer; change to Interpersonal and Interinstitutional?
  • Not normative; there are some comments above and in the issues that should be dealt with separately with normative changes, though.
  • I did capture the entire discussion from the issues above and embedded it in a comment for easy reference; this should be stripped in the final version

@mmccool
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmccool commented Feb 22, 2021

  • add references from S&P section (which is informative) to normative items addressing particular concerns. This will make it easier for Security/Privacy reviews to find risks and mitigations.
  • We might even mention a risk but just point to a normative mitigation that addresses it (e.g. query injection -> limited expressive power of queries)

For example, for DDoS, we should reference specific mechanisms specified to prevent query injections, use of arbitrary JS in JSON Path, etc. (last point might be dealt with in IETF JSON path spec though, need to check).

@mmccool mmccool merged commit 75bf2a6 into w3c:master Feb 22, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant