-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 56
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Proposal: i18n-system-languages #569
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, Carlos!
proposals/i18n-getOSLanguage.md
Outdated
```json | ||
{ | ||
"name": "getOSLanguage", | ||
"type": "function", | ||
"nocompile": true, | ||
"description": "Gets the UI language of the Operating System. This is different from $(ref:i18n.getUILanguage) which returns the UI language of the web browser.", | ||
"parameters": [], | ||
"returns": { | ||
"type": "string", | ||
"description": "An IETF BCP 47 language tag such as en-US or pt-BR." | ||
} | ||
} | ||
``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: I'd lean towards describing these in typescript (for now), since it's a more portable format than Chromium's use of JSON schema. Especially things like "nocompile" are very Chromium-specific.
That said, if other browser vendors are fine with (or prefer) this, I don't feel strongly, since, well, this is obviously good enough for Chromium : )
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agreed, TypeScript would make more sense.
proposals/i18n-getOSLanguage.md
Outdated
"nocompile": true, | ||
"description": "Gets the UI language of the Operating System. This is different from $(ref:i18n.getUILanguage) which returns the UI language of the web browser.", | ||
"parameters": [], | ||
"returns": { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This implies a synchronous return. Is that a requirement?
(I'm not sure if we'd have the OS language available in the renderer today, unlike the UI language)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In Mozilla Firefox, the OS language is available in the renderer synchronously. In general the motivation to return synchronously is to match i18n.getUILanguage
. Having it synchronously is also very welcome to load locale data as quickly as possible for bidi, lang attributes, locale specific files and potentially in the future, passing it to an API like i18n.getLanguageDictionary
proposals/i18n-getOSLanguage.md
Outdated
**Document Metadata** | ||
|
||
**Author:** carlosjeurissen | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This dropped the "sponsoring browser" item here.
That was added to ensure the proposals here don't become a graveyard of aspirational APIs and instead reflect ones that at least one browser is committed to implementing in the immediate future.
I'll need to do some quick investigation into the implementation. If it looks straightforward, I'm comfortable putting Google Chrome as the sponsoring browser.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added back the Sponsoring browser with a TBD.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm supportive of sponsoring for Safari and plan to implement it as soon as we have consensus.
@xeenon Thanks for reviewing and the willingness to implement this. @rdcronin Thanks for reviewing and your comments. Most feedback has been implemented in the proposal. Thanks for offering to sponser the feature as browser. @Rob--W Reading from your comment in the reading notes of Today's (2024-03-28) meeting:
It was under my impression there was general support for this feature across browsers and the next step would be a proposal. However I understand your concerns regarding ending up with many proposals without browsers moving forward to actually implement them. So I went ahead and created a patch for Firefox. |
Part of the proposal template includes an item about the "sponsoring" browser. As Devlin commented elsewhere in the PR, the purpose of that is to encourage proposals that reflect APIs that have a path towards realization rather than just being aspirational.
Thanks for the bug and patch! |
proposals/i18n-getOSLanguage.md
Outdated
|
||
`i18n.getOSLanguage()` would synchronously return a [BCP47 language tag](https://www.w3.org/International/core/langtags/rfc3066bis.html) like `i18n.getUILanguage()` does right now. | ||
|
||
It would follow the following signature for [i18n.json](https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/refs/heads/main/extensions/common/api/i18n.json): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
When referencing source code, try to use a permalink where possible. In this case there has been a request to use IDL instead of JSON, so this line will probably end up being dropped. If not, here is the permalink: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/4299ce68496b32ba309e2f012e0db5b4b8cd478a/extensions/common/api/i18n.json
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good to know! Updated the proposal to reflect this!
proposals/i18n-getOSLanguage.md
Outdated
|
||
**Summary** | ||
|
||
Allow to get the language of your operating system as an [BCP47 language tag](https://www.w3.org/International/core/langtags/rfc3066bis.html). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Given the discussion starting from #252 (comment), should we rename the proposal to i18n.getOSLanguages
and let it return an array?
And also, guarantee the array to be non-empty?
As the discussion deepens (#252), I think there are four concepts here:
So, ideally there should be four functions:
And deprecate the current Or using another design:
|
Updated the proposal which addresses the following:
For |
proposals/i18n-system-languages.md
Outdated
|
||
#### Use Cases | ||
|
||
Having the original system language(s) is useful for language-related extensions and for extensions who want to provide translations more true to the system language. For example, to adapt to a specific sub-language, like Belgium-Dutch (nl-BE). While i18n.getUILanguage would return 'nl'. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The example here is not very clear. There is a tendency to think that the primary language subtag (nl
in the examples here) is "the language", but there are language variations that depend on additional subtags, such as script or region. For example, zh-Hans
(Simplified Chinese) vs. zh-Hant
(Traditional Chinese). Thus, the UI language is not guaranteed to be a single subtag.
It's also more useful/helpful to talk about the locale than it is to talk about the language, even if, for historical reasons, we use the word "Language" in the API names.
Note that locale means more than just language adaptation. Frequently, locale-based variations in number, date, time, measurement, etc. formatting constitute a key part of adaptation.
Note too that the use cases here are incomplete. The PR lists a number of different reasons, but you only have one in the document itself.
Thus:
Having the original system language(s) is useful for language-related extensions and for extensions who want to provide translations more true to the system language. For example, to adapt to a specific sub-language, like Belgium-Dutch (nl-BE). While i18n.getUILanguage would return 'nl'. | |
Extension authors might want to obtain the locale used by the user agent's host environment in order to format values (such as numbers, dates, and so forth) or do other locale-affected operations (such as list sorting) according to expectations of the user. For example, formatting the date `2024-06-15` varies between `en-US` (6/15/2024) and `en-GB` (15/6/2024), whereas `i18n.getUILanguage` might return only `en` (English). | |
Extension authors might want to obtain the locale used by the user agent's host environment to better match the runtime environment's localization. For example, the operating system might be running in `ff-NG` (Fulani as used in Nigeria), but the user agent might not be localized into this language and return `en` (English) for `i18n.getUILanguage`. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@aphillips Thanks so much for the suggestions! Applied the suggested change.
Also added a better example of the purest form use-case which describes i18n.getUILanguage
returning a language tag with additional subtags which might not be sufficient for the user.
Lastly rewritten sentences to use locale instead of language where it makes sense based on your suggestion.
proposals/i18n-system-languages.md
Outdated
|
||
### Schema | ||
|
||
`i18n.getPreferredSystemLanguages()` would asynchronously return a list of [BCP47 language tag](https://www.rfc-editor.org/bcp/bcp47.html) like `i18n.getAcceptLanguages()` does right now. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Probably you want to say that it returns an ordered list (BCP47 calls this a "language priority list").
Note that most operating systems don't provide a feature like this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@aphillips thanks for noting and clarifying! Updated the sentence to reflect these suggestions. It is indeed meant to be an ordered list. As far as I know both mac and windows support this. But I could be wrong?
b4ce1eb
to
84248c4
Compare
@carlosjeurissen There seems to have been a rebase issue, where this PR picked up a bunch of other changes from the repo outside of your proposal. |
Co-authored-by: Pavel Djundik <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Addison Phillips <[email protected]>
84248c4
to
395c02e
Compare
@xeenon Thanks for noting! Has been addressed. |
Based on some of the feedback during TPAC, updated this PR and updated the Firefox patch. |
proposals/i18n-system-languages.md
Outdated
@@ -67,11 +70,14 @@ It would follow the following signature for [i18n.json](https://chromium.googles | |||
"name": "getSystemUILanguage", | |||
"type": "function", | |||
"nocompile": true, | |||
"description": "Gets the current UI language of the Operating System. This is different from $(ref:i18n.getUILanguage) which returns the UI language of the web browser.", | |||
"description": "Gets the current UI locale of the Operating System. This is different from $(ref:i18n.getUILanguage) which returns the UI locale of the web browser. This locale could include additional information like preferred datetime format and number system if supported by the OS.", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is the "additional information" part a standard? I know Apple platforms can include it, but that isn't something we have had in web extensions before.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@xeenon yes, this is specified by unicode. This was discussed during the shared session with the WECG/I18NWG meeting at TPAC. However, giving a further look at this I see how this should not be part of the getSystemUILanguage. Updated the PR to reflect this. Still, providing this information can be useful, but it should be implemented using some other method / proposal.
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=280586 Reviewed by NOBODY (OOPS!). WECG issue: w3c/webextensions#252 WECG proposal: w3c/webextensions#569 Also changed the i18n APIs to return `"und"` instead of `undefined` when there is no language code. * Source/WebKit/Platform/spi/Cocoa/FoundationSPI.h: * Source/WebKit/Shared/Extensions/WebExtensionUtilities.mm: (WebKit::toWebAPI): Return "und" where then is no language code. * Source/WebKit/WebProcess/Extensions/API/Cocoa/WebExtensionAPILocalizationCocoa.mm: (WebKit::WebExtensionAPILocalization::getPreferredSystemLanguages): (WebKit::WebExtensionAPILocalization::getSystemUILanguage): * Source/WebKit/WebProcess/Extensions/API/WebExtensionAPILocalization.h: * Source/WebKit/WebProcess/Extensions/Interfaces/WebExtensionAPILocalization.idl: * Tools/TestWebKitAPI/Tests/WebKitCocoa/WKWebExtensionAPILocalization.mm: (TestWebKitAPI::localeStringInWebExtensionFormat): Return "und". (TestWebKitAPI::TEST(WKWebExtensionAPILocalization, i18n)): (TestWebKitAPI::TEST(WKWebExtensionAPILocalization, i18nWithFallback)): (TestWebKitAPI::TEST(WKWebExtensionAPILocalization, i18nWithoutMessages)): (TestWebKitAPI::TEST(WKWebExtensionAPILocalization, i18nWithoutDefaultLocale)):
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=280586 Reviewed by Brian Weinstein. WECG issue: w3c/webextensions#252 WECG proposal: w3c/webextensions#569 Also changed the i18n APIs to return `"und"` instead of `undefined` when there is no language code. * Source/WebKit/Platform/spi/Cocoa/FoundationSPI.h: * Source/WebKit/Shared/Extensions/WebExtensionUtilities.mm: (WebKit::toWebAPI): Return "und" where then is no language code. * Source/WebKit/WebProcess/Extensions/API/Cocoa/WebExtensionAPILocalizationCocoa.mm: (WebKit::WebExtensionAPILocalization::getPreferredSystemLanguages): (WebKit::WebExtensionAPILocalization::getSystemUILanguage): * Source/WebKit/WebProcess/Extensions/API/WebExtensionAPILocalization.h: * Source/WebKit/WebProcess/Extensions/Interfaces/WebExtensionAPILocalization.idl: * Tools/TestWebKitAPI/Tests/WebKitCocoa/WKWebExtensionAPILocalization.mm: (TestWebKitAPI::localeStringInWebExtensionFormat): Return "und". (TestWebKitAPI::TEST(WKWebExtensionAPILocalization, i18n)): (TestWebKitAPI::TEST(WKWebExtensionAPILocalization, i18nWithFallback)): (TestWebKitAPI::TEST(WKWebExtensionAPILocalization, i18nWithoutMessages)): (TestWebKitAPI::TEST(WKWebExtensionAPILocalization, i18nWithoutDefaultLocale)): Canonical link: https://commits.webkit.org/284637@main
This PR adds the proposal for both
i18n.getPreferredSystemLanguages()
andi18n.getSystemUILanguage()
previously calledi18n.getOSLanguage()
, which all vendors are supportive on as discussed in #252