Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Specify "Use another account". #678
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Specify "Use another account". #678
Changes from 6 commits
a191a15
3d56908
cbd0adf
af610e6
cd1c73d
82ea3fa
533de6b
20b53f0
c9b78be
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The parallel steps would be better presented as bullets (which might bullets within a numbered step), rather than as numbered steps. As this stands, I am unsure exactly which steps are
running in parallel
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This would not be correct. Please check the definition of "in parallel": https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/infrastructure.html#in-parallel
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The definition of "in parallel" is not sufficient for me (and I have some familiarity with the subject) to know whether the numbered steps (1)-(20) of which this Assert is (1) are to run in parallel with each other (which appears possible, and indeed, the most likely meaning) or that this sequence of 20 steps is to occur in parallel with other operations (sequences, single steps, etc.) in the spec.
Presuming that one goal of writing this specification is to have it be comprehensible by readers who are new to the subject, I suggest that some rewording would be helpful.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A PR to the HTML spec is welcome, but I think it's pretty clear personally:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"In parallel" does not mean "in sequence", no matter what spec is written as if it does.
Also, I highly doubt that most readers of this spec will go to the HTML spec, so while I may well submit a PR there (if I can find where to do so; it wasn't obvious when I looked for it yesterday), I think it better to provide more clarity in the FedCM spec.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For better or worse, "in parallel" is an existing term in specland. Ted, do you have a specific suggestion for how to improve this?
In general we should assume that readers either know what these terms mean or click through to their definition, IMO.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(https://github.com/whatwg/html/blob/main/source is where you would send PRs for the HTML spec)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unfortunately, GitHub's web interface (my primary tool) can't handle docs the size of that WHATWG source. But, I was able to view it, and noted the "parallel queue".
I think that's a more apt description of this 20-step sequence. Something like
(That does presume that plurals of defined terms are properly handled; the last might need change from
[=parallel queues=]
to[=parallel queue=]
.)I've added a note to whatwg/html#10049, but noting that they have 1923 open issues and 169 pending pull requests, I don't have high hopes of it being addressed in a timely fashion.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@domenic — Your thumb-down emoji doesn't communicate even as well as the "in parallel" that is meant to be understood as some language other than English. If you have an argument against my points, please do me the courtesy of writing it out.