Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

T6560: added path ignore for workflows #3796

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from
Closed

T6560: added path ignore for workflows #3796

wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

kumvijaya
Copy link
Contributor

Change Summary

T6560: added path ignore for workflows

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Code style update (formatting, renaming)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes)
  • Migration from an old Vyatta component to vyos-1x, please link to related PR inside obsoleted component
  • Other (please describe):

Related Task(s)

https://vyos.dev/T6560

Related PR(s)

Component(s) name

Proposed changes

How to test

Smoketest result

Checklist:

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document
  • I have linked this PR to one or more Phabricator Task(s)
  • I have run the components SMOKETESTS if applicable
  • My commit headlines contain a valid Task id
  • My change requires a change to the documentation
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 5, 2024


Commit title 'Merge branch 'vyos:current' into current' does not match the required format!. Valid title example: T99999: make IPsec secure

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 5, 2024

👍
No issues in unused-imports

@kumvijaya kumvijaya closed this Jul 5, 2024
@kumvijaya kumvijaya reopened this Jul 6, 2024
@kumvijaya kumvijaya closed this Jul 6, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 6, 2024

CI integration ❌ failed!

Details

CI logs

  • CLI Smoketests ❌ failed
  • Config tests 👍 passed
  • RAID1 tests 👍 passed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant