Dumping JaCoCo Coverage into the JSON file #118
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
In the previous commits only target class are considered to fetch coverage. In this commit I introduced the collection of the coverage for all classes
Change Java 16+ toList() to Collectors.toList() from Java 11
khbminus
force-pushed
the
khbminus/json-coverage
branch
from
364e248
to
293b36f
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changes
Added a
@Serializableannotation to the CoverageInfo classes as well as the Serializers for them. Additionally, I've changed the signature of thecollectCoveragefor collecting more coverageI added two new flags:
coverageJsonLocation— a path for a result JSON file that contains a set of all covered objectscollectWholeCoverage— a boolean flag to collect the coverage of all classes (except the kotlin/kex/Java stdlib)Threats
The
collectWholeCoveragefor now only works for classes, the filters for stdlib are written very sketchily and, I suppose, require a full refactor