Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

vtorc: fetch all tablets from cells once + filter during refresh #17388

Open
wants to merge 11 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

timvaillancourt
Copy link
Contributor

@timvaillancourt timvaillancourt commented Dec 12, 2024

Description

This PR changes VTOrc tablet discovery to fetch all tablets once and filter them client side

Today, when --clusters_to_watch is set, VTOrc will call refreshTabletsInKeyspaceShard(...) in a goroutine for every shard when refreshing tablets at the interval --topo-information-refresh-duration

Unfortunately calling refreshTabletsInKeyspaceShard(...) is very inefficient because behind the scenes it is just loading all tablets from all cells because fetching just 1-shard or keyspace from the topo store isn't possible without fetching "all" 😱

This means that today a single refresh of all tablets causes shards x # tablets to be read instead of just # tablets, and much of the data read is just duplicated. Instead this PR causes only # of tablets to be fetched each tick

Related Issue(s)

Tracking issue: #17330

Checklist

  • "Backport to:" labels have been added if this change should be back-ported to release branches
  • If this change is to be back-ported to previous releases, a justification is included in the PR description
  • Tests were added or are not required
  • Did the new or modified tests pass consistently locally and on CI?
  • Documentation was added or is not required

Deployment Notes

Signed-off-by: Tim Vaillancourt <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tim Vaillancourt <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tim Vaillancourt <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tim Vaillancourt <[email protected]>
@timvaillancourt timvaillancourt added Type: Enhancement Logical improvement (somewhere between a bug and feature) Type: Performance Component: VTorc Vitess Orchestrator integration Component: Performance labels Dec 12, 2024
@timvaillancourt timvaillancourt self-assigned this Dec 12, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

vitess-bot bot commented Dec 12, 2024

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • Ensure there is a link to an issue (except for internal cleanup and flaky test fixes), new features should have an RFC that documents use cases and test cases.

Tests

  • Bug fixes should have at least one unit or end-to-end test, enhancement and new features should have a sufficient number of tests.

Documentation

  • Apply the release notes (needs details) label if users need to know about this change.
  • New features should be documented.
  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.
  • There should be a comment at the top of each new or modified test to explain what the test does.

New flags

  • Is this flag really necessary?
  • Flag names must be clear and intuitive, use dashes (-), and have a clear help text.

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow needs to be marked as required, the maintainer team must be notified.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from vitess-operator and arewefastyet, if used there.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.

@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot added NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says labels Dec 12, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v22.0.0 milestone Dec 12, 2024
@timvaillancourt timvaillancourt removed NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required labels Dec 12, 2024
@timvaillancourt timvaillancourt changed the title vtorc: fetch all tablets from cells once and filter vtorc: fetch all tablets from cells once + filter during refresh Dec 12, 2024
Signed-off-by: Tim Vaillancourt <[email protected]>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 12, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 86 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 67.51%. Comparing base (44aa9d7) to head (189b445).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
go/vt/vtorc/logic/tablet_discovery.go 0.00% 82 Missing ⚠️
go/vt/vtorc/logic/vtorc.go 0.00% 4 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #17388      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   67.47%   67.51%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files        1581     1581              
  Lines      253944   253972      +28     
==========================================
+ Hits       171353   171465     +112     
+ Misses      82591    82507      -84     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Signed-off-by: Tim Vaillancourt <[email protected]>
@timvaillancourt timvaillancourt marked this pull request as ready for review December 12, 2024 23:57
@timvaillancourt timvaillancourt marked this pull request as draft December 13, 2024 00:19
@timvaillancourt
Copy link
Contributor Author

This introduces a problem if shards are added/removed. Moving back to draft

Signed-off-by: Tim Vaillancourt <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tim Vaillancourt <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Component: Performance Component: VTorc Vitess Orchestrator integration Type: Enhancement Logical improvement (somewhere between a bug and feature) Type: Performance
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant