Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: Avoid creating
MoveTables
in case of non-empty target tables #16826fix: Avoid creating
MoveTables
in case of non-empty target tables #16826Changes from 1 commit
a9ea332
10ee600
8393dea
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why do this for every shard? Can't we build the query once and then use it on each shard?
Keep in mind that the size of this query is unbounded, so we could hit
max_allowed_packet
. I want to say that there's also a limit on the number of UNIONs you can do in a single statement but I didn't find any docs on that in a quick search. For JOINs e.g.:So that may be what we bump up against here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks Matt for finding this. Fixed that. But even I couldn't find out the limit of
UNION
s on any docs or web search. What do you think should be the limit? Should we break the query down into multiple queries?