Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release-20.0] Migrate Workflow: Scope vindex names correctly when target and source keyspace have different names (#16769) #16815

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 23, 2024

Conversation

vitess-bot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot commented Sep 21, 2024

Description

This is a backport of #16769

… keyspace have different names (#16769)

Signed-off-by: Rohit Nayak <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor Author

vitess-bot bot commented Sep 21, 2024

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • Ensure there is a link to an issue (except for internal cleanup and flaky test fixes), new features should have an RFC that documents use cases and test cases.

Tests

  • Bug fixes should have at least one unit or end-to-end test, enhancement and new features should have a sufficient number of tests.

Documentation

  • Apply the release notes (needs details) label if users need to know about this change.
  • New features should be documented.
  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.
  • There should be a comment at the top of each new or modified test to explain what the test does.

New flags

  • Is this flag really necessary?
  • Flag names must be clear and intuitive, use dashes (-), and have a clear help text.

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow needs to be marked as required, the maintainer team must be notified.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from vitess-operator and arewefastyet, if used there.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.

@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v20.0.3 milestone Sep 21, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 21, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 50.00000% with 9 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 68.66%. Comparing base (b058ba2) to head (333888d).
Report is 17 commits behind head on release-20.0.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
go/vt/vtctl/workflow/materializer.go 50.00% 4 Missing ⚠️
go/vt/wrangler/materializer.go 50.00% 4 Missing ⚠️
go/vt/vtctl/workflow/server.go 50.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##           release-20.0   #16815      +/-   ##
================================================
- Coverage         68.66%   68.66%   -0.01%     
================================================
  Files              1541     1541              
  Lines            197937   197953      +16     
================================================
  Hits             135922   135922              
- Misses            62015    62031      +16     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

This PR is being marked as stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity. To rectify, you may do any of the following:

  • Push additional commits to the associated branch.
  • Remove the stale label.
  • Add a comment indicating why it is not stale.

If no action is taken within 7 days, this PR will be closed.

@github-actions github-actions bot added Stale Marks PRs as stale after a period of inactivity, which are then closed after a grace period. and removed Stale Marks PRs as stale after a period of inactivity, which are then closed after a grace period. labels Oct 22, 2024
@frouioui frouioui merged commit 6d2ef17 into release-20.0 Oct 23, 2024
190 checks passed
@frouioui frouioui deleted the backport-16769-to-release-20.0 branch October 23, 2024 19:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants