Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

CI workflows: Split long running vreplication workflows #15834

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 3, 2024
Merged

CI workflows: Split long running vreplication workflows #15834

merged 1 commit into from
May 3, 2024

Conversation

rohit-nayak-ps
Copy link
Contributor

Description

A couple of VReplication workflows were taking 20-25 minutes, making them the slowest workflows. Splitting them so that each runs in 10-15 minutes so that we can parallelize better.

Related Issue(s)

Checklist

  • "Backport to:" labels have been added if this change should be back-ported to release branches
  • If this change is to be back-ported to previous releases, a justification is included in the PR description
  • Tests were added or are not required
  • Did the new or modified tests pass consistently locally and on CI?
  • Documentation was added or is not required

Deployment Notes

@vitess-bot vitess-bot
Copy link
Contributor

vitess-bot bot commented May 2, 2024

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • Ensure there is a link to an issue (except for internal cleanup and flaky test fixes), new features should have an RFC that documents use cases and test cases.

Tests

  • Bug fixes should have at least one unit or end-to-end test, enhancement and new features should have a sufficient number of tests.

Documentation

  • Apply the release notes (needs details) label if users need to know about this change.
  • New features should be documented.
  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.
  • There should be a comment at the top of each new or modified test to explain what the test does.

New flags

  • Is this flag really necessary?
  • Flag names must be clear and intuitive, use dashes (-), and have a clear help text.

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow needs to be marked as required, the maintainer team must be notified.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from vitess-operator and arewefastyet, if used there.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.

@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot added NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says labels May 2, 2024
@rohit-nayak-ps rohit-nayak-ps added Type: Feature Component: Build/CI and removed NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required labels May 2, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v20.0.0 milestone May 2, 2024
@rohit-nayak-ps rohit-nayak-ps marked this pull request as ready for review May 2, 2024 16:05
mattlord
mattlord approved these changes May 3, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@mattlord mattlord left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❤️

frouioui
frouioui approved these changes May 3, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@frouioui frouioui left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should mark these new workflows as required once the PR is merged. Otherwise looks good to me.

@rohit-nayak-ps rohit-nayak-ps merged commit f27d287 into vitessio:main May 3, 2024
103 checks passed
@rohit-nayak-ps rohit-nayak-ps deleted the rohit/vr-e2e-reorg branch May 3, 2024 10:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@frouioui frouioui frouioui approved these changes

@mattlord mattlord mattlord approved these changes

@deepthi deepthi deepthi approved these changes

@GuptaManan100 GuptaManan100 Awaiting requested review from GuptaManan100 GuptaManan100 is a code owner

@harshit-gangal harshit-gangal Awaiting requested review from harshit-gangal harshit-gangal is a code owner

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Component: Build/CI Type: Feature
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v20.0.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@rohit-nayak-ps @deepthi @mattlord @frouioui