Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

examples: rm heartbeat flags #14980

Merged

Conversation

maxenglander
Copy link
Collaborator

@maxenglander maxenglander commented Jan 18, 2024

Description

I chatted w/ @mattlord about #14978, he said:

We should just remove that flag in the examples.

I initially added those flags here as I was using the local examples to test it: #12737

They shouldn’t be necessary anymore — you can enable the throttler at the keyspace level in the topo using vtctldclient and use defaults for the other things.

We should backport all the way to release-17.0 as well. That’s the oldest version that has those flags in the script.

I tested this by running all the way through the local example, verifying that no lag was reported on @replica or @rdonly, and did not see any other issues.

Related Issue(s)

Fixes #14978.

Checklist

  • "Backport to:" labels have been added if this change should be back-ported to release branches
  • If this change is to be back-ported to previous releases, a justification is included in the PR description
  • Tests were added or are not required
  • Did the new or modified tests pass consistently locally and on CI?
  • Documentation was added or is not required

Signed-off-by: Max Englander <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

vitess-bot bot commented Jan 18, 2024

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • Ensure there is a link to an issue (except for internal cleanup and flaky test fixes), new features should have an RFC that documents use cases and test cases.

Tests

  • Bug fixes should have at least one unit or end-to-end test, enhancement and new features should have a sufficient number of tests.

Documentation

  • Apply the release notes (needs details) label if users need to know about this change.
  • New features should be documented.
  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.
  • There should be a comment at the top of each new or modified test to explain what the test does.

New flags

  • Is this flag really necessary?
  • Flag names must be clear and intuitive, use dashes (-), and have a clear help text.

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow needs to be marked as required, the maintainer team must be notified.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from vitess-operator and arewefastyet, if used there.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.

@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot added NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says labels Jan 18, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v19.0.0 milestone Jan 18, 2024
@maxenglander maxenglander marked this pull request as ready for review January 18, 2024 04:31
@maxenglander maxenglander requested a review from deepthi as a code owner January 18, 2024 04:31
@mattlord mattlord added Type: Documentation and removed NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required labels Jan 18, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@mattlord mattlord left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, @maxenglander ! ❤️

@shlomi-noach can you also please take a quick look at this when you have time? Thanks!

@frouioui frouioui merged commit 22809e4 into vitessio:main Jan 19, 2024
104 of 107 checks passed
@frouioui frouioui deleted the maxeng-localexample-rm-heartbeat branch January 19, 2024 20:17
vitess-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 19, 2024
@frouioui
Copy link
Member

Ah, sorry, I merged this after reading @shlomi-noach can you also please take a quick look at this when you have time? Thanks!.

@shlomi-noach, feel free to revert this PR if it does not look good.

mattlord added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 19, 2024
Signed-off-by: Matt Lord <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: vitess-bot[bot] <108069721+vitess-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Matt Lord <[email protected]>
mattlord pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 19, 2024
Signed-off-by: Max Englander <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: vitess-bot[bot] <108069721+vitess-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@shlomi-noach
Copy link
Contributor

It's fine to remove these flags in examples as well as backporting to 17 👍

@shlomi-noach
Copy link
Contributor

Followup in #15099

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug Report: Vitess local examples high replica heartbeat lag
4 participants