Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Build and push Docker vitess/lite to DockerHub from GitHub Actions #14243

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Oct 13, 2023

Conversation

frouioui
Copy link
Member

@frouioui frouioui commented Oct 11, 2023

Description

This PR adds automatic builds for the vitess/lite Docker Image on GitHub Actions instead of building them on DockerHub. An example of how the build works can be found below:

Note to self: remove DockerHub auto build once this is merged.

Note to reviewers: the new secrets have already been added to the repository.

Related Issue(s)

Checklist

  • "Backport to:" labels have been added if this change should be back-ported
  • Tests were added or are not required
  • Did the new or modified tests pass consistently locally and on the CI
  • Documentation was added or is not required

@vitess-bot
Copy link
Contributor

vitess-bot bot commented Oct 11, 2023

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • Ensure there is a link to an issue (except for internal cleanup and flaky test fixes), new features should have an RFC that documents use cases and test cases.

Tests

  • Bug fixes should have at least one unit or end-to-end test, enhancement and new features should have a sufficient number of tests.

Documentation

  • Apply the release notes (needs details) label if users need to know about this change.
  • New features should be documented.
  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.
  • There should be a comment at the top of each new or modified test to explain what the test does.

New flags

  • Is this flag really necessary?
  • Flag names must be clear and intuitive, use dashes (-), and have a clear help text.

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow needs to be marked as required, the maintainer team must be notified.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from vitess-operator and arewefastyet, if used there.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.

@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot added NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says labels Oct 11, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v19.0.0 milestone Oct 11, 2023
@frouioui frouioui added Type: Enhancement Logical improvement (somewhere between a bug and feature) Component: Docker and removed NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request labels Oct 12, 2023
@frouioui frouioui changed the title Build and push Docker Images to DockerHub from GitHub Actions Build and push Docker vitess/lite to DockerHub from GitHub Actions Oct 12, 2023
Signed-off-by: Florent Poinsard <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

@mattlord mattlord left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thank you for working on this! ❤️ Nice work 🙂

@frouioui frouioui merged commit 1f1d731 into vitessio:main Oct 13, 2023
115 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Component: Docker Type: Enhancement Logical improvement (somewhere between a bug and feature)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants